Posted on 05/31/2015 8:31:39 AM PDT by PROCON
With an assist from GZ
The media hates white Hispanics.
How so?
Wasn’t there a mention that the guy had previously used a .357, no less, to shoot at squirrels in his front yard?
1. Compulsive preoccupation with an idea or an unwanted feeling or emotion, often accompanied by symptoms of anxiety.
2. A compulsive, often unreasonable idea or emotion.
No doubt.
“used a .357, no less, to shoot at squirrels in his front yard?”
Hey watch that, I did use a 357 but it was loaded with bird shot and it was my side yard.
Zimmerman should run for public office. He’s Teflon against the media cult.
He will not win that defense, he was seen in broad daylight.
So when he looses the stand your ground defense, what then media?
Hehe
“In the motion asking for the GPS device, prosecutors disclosed that Apperson was released from a mental ward three weeks before the shooting.
He has a history of bipolar disorder and anxiety, according to the state.”
There’s simply too much preclusion for a SYG defense to work.
The history he has with Zimmerman, the fact thar he pursued George despite prior claims he made that George threatened him makes it hard to swallow that its more likely than unlikely he was defending himself.
Preclusion coupled with a lack of a preponderance of evidence means he’s going to jail.
The media is judge and jury. They have convicted Zim and are carrying out the punishment.
So the media tries to spin an attempted assassination into a “Stand Your Ground” defense?
This is simply insane.
George Zimmerman did not do anything but try to flee. And numerous witnesses collaborate his version of events.
http://gunwatch.blogspot.com/2015/05/confirmed-zimmerman-shooting-apparent.html
After Apperson shot at George Zimmerman’s head, he said, recorded by a police officer: “I hope I got him this time.”
“A media vendetta! Sarah Palin suffered a media vendetta too. Does this mean that in reality that we live under a pathetic totalitarian regime?”
It means that we have lived under a mediacracy for at least 50 years, and with the Internet and getting rid of the “fairness doctrine”, we are fighting to get out from under it.
They’re probably getting orders from up high not to let a non-black get away with defending himself from a black man.
Perfect. You’ve got the MSM narrative down cold, cartoonish exaggerations and all.
Explain this one?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.