Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Greenfield: The Democratic Party’s Civil War is Here
Sultan Knish blog ^ | Sunday, November 09, 2014 | Daniel Greenfield

Posted on 11/09/2014 2:53:10 PM PST by Louis Foxwell

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last

Sultan Knish/Daniel Greenfield Ping List notification of new articles.

FReepmail or drop me a comment to get on or off the Sultan Knish ping list. I highly recommend an occasional look at the Sultan Knish blog. It is a rich source of materials, links and more from one of the preeminent writers of our age.

We are uniquely privileged to be able to enjoy DG from our perch at FR.
Lou

1 posted on 11/09/2014 2:53:10 PM PST by Louis Foxwell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: daisy mae for the usa; AdvisorB; wizardoz; free-in-nyc; Vendome; Georgia Girl 2; blaveda; ...

Well bless their hearts. We are just so excited about the pickle the Dems find themselves floundering in. They are up to their ears in sour brine with no where to go. We would help but they need to stew in their juices until they are thoroughly pickled.

2 posted on 11/09/2014 2:56:25 PM PST by Louis Foxwell (This is a wake up call. Join the Sultan Knish ping list.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Louis Foxwell

If there is a civil war in tbe rat party it should be a doozy. The craziest passive aggressive sons of bitches on the planet earth.


3 posted on 11/09/2014 2:56:31 PM PST by ImJustAnotherOkie (zerogottago)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Louis Foxwell

Bttt.


4 posted on 11/09/2014 2:57:44 PM PST by Inyo-Mono (NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Louis Foxwell

Reid, pelosi, jarret, and Obama have said some very mean and vindictive things over the past 7 years.

And we ALL have them at the tips of our fingers with the Internet.

I REALLY hope the winning Republicans don’t let them get away with ANY of it.


5 posted on 11/09/2014 2:59:29 PM PST by left that other site (You shall know the Truth, and The Truth Shall Set You Free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Louis Foxwell

Democratic Civil War?

Maybe... would’nt somebody be running besides Hillary then?


6 posted on 11/09/2014 3:01:01 PM PST by CharleysPride (non chiedere cio che non si puo prendere)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Louis Foxwell

Thanks for posting.


7 posted on 11/09/2014 3:02:04 PM PST by Excellence (Marine mom since April 11, 2014)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Louis Foxwell

I say we arm both sides with live ammo.


8 posted on 11/09/2014 3:02:44 PM PST by Lurker (Violence is rarely the answer. But when it is it is the only answer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Louis Foxwell

We have two years to take the Scott Walker playbook out and defund them.


9 posted on 11/09/2014 3:07:50 PM PST by Vince Ferrer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Louis Foxwell

Not much about the ‘Rats is really civil.


10 posted on 11/09/2014 3:10:06 PM PST by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Louis Foxwell
Bill had wanted Hillary to play Sarah Palin, turning her into a kingmaker and building on a narrative of female empowerment by having her back female senators. Instead Kay Hagan, Michelle Nunn, Alison Lundergan Grimes and Amanda Curtis lost.

And yet many here on FR seem to think her nomination and election are inevitable, despite her 2008 debacle. The hard left considers her too moderate, and she comes off as shrill and unlikable on the campaign trail. And now she's old on top of everything else. I don't think she will even win the nomination.

11 posted on 11/09/2014 3:11:24 PM PST by Hugin ("Do yourself a favor--first thing, get a firearm!",)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Louis Foxwell

I love it when the rats start eating each other...


12 posted on 11/09/2014 3:13:33 PM PST by publius911 (Formerly Publius6961)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Louis Foxwell

I strongly object to allowing the radical Socialist/Fascist/Commies the term “progressive”. They are anything but; they keep going back to the failed policies of the past. There is nothing “progressive” about that!


13 posted on 11/09/2014 3:15:03 PM PST by logic101.net (How many more children must die on the altar of gun free zones?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Louis Foxwell

I’m not falling for any of this! Democrats are out to win in 2016 and nothing will change their tactics of personal destruction of any that oppose them!

Hide and watch, you will see them rise out of the ashes to cause even more destruction in the near future!


14 posted on 11/09/2014 3:17:07 PM PST by Randy Larsen (Aim small, Miss small.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Louis Foxwell

Unusually good column Mr. Greenfield.


15 posted on 11/09/2014 3:22:06 PM PST by Steely Tom (Thank you for self-censoring.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Louis Foxwell

There is NO Civil War.

DemoKKKrat party = Communist Party

Leftism is always rebranding their movements and identities.


16 posted on 11/09/2014 3:24:36 PM PST by newfreep ("Evil succeeds when good men do nothting" - Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: logic101.net
I strongly object to allowing the radical Socialist/Fascist/Commies the term “progressive”

I was hoping Greenfield would describe the socialist /communists in those terms but he cushioned the blow with : The other Democratic Party is progressive.

That dampened the article for me.
Kind of like describing ISIS as a group of jobless disgruntled young men. .-Tom

17 posted on 11/09/2014 3:25:02 PM PST by Capt. Tom (Don't confuse U.S. citizens and Americans. They are not necessarily the same. -tom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ImJustAnotherOkie

“The craziest sons of bitches on the planet earth.”

Fixed that fer’ ya. Aggressive? Most of them. Passive? None of them. Crazy? Genetic prerequisite for them.


18 posted on 11/09/2014 3:26:27 PM PST by Norm Lenhart (Feet to the fire folks. YOU PROMISED!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Louis Foxwell
Obama and his people would rather radicalize the Democratic Party and lose, than moderate their positions and stand a chance of winning.

David Horowitz says this happened in 1968.

19 posted on 11/09/2014 3:26:55 PM PST by Tax-chick (You are never far from a spider.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; ...

> One is the old corrupt party of thieves and crooks...

The other is the new corrupt party of thieves and crooks. They don’t care about getting the most votes, they just want to steal the elections any which way they can, and rule from a single party state framework. They are funded from outside the country, or by naturalized foreigners who have managed to pillage fortunes.


20 posted on 11/09/2014 3:30:34 PM PST by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/_______________________Celebrate the Polls, Ignore the Trolls)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson