Posted on 11/04/2014 2:14:50 PM PST by therightliveswithus
I’ve posted this before, I think it’s a viable strategy: Don’t count on any level of government to investigate this chicanery. SUE the manufacturer of the voting machines for fraud. Sue them for a LOT of bucks. I GUARANTEE the company will find out who’s been messing with its machines RIGHT QUICK.
“According to a local report, voters who noticed that their votes were changed were allowed to vote again. “
Well, wouldn’t that just cancel out their first (incorrect) vote ? What a deal.
“I’ve posted this before, I think it’s a viable strategy: Don’t count on any level of government to investigate this chicanery. SUE the manufacturer of the voting machines for fraud. Sue them for a LOT of bucks. I GUARANTEE the company will find out who’s been messing with its machines RIGHT QUICK.”
I will bet that somewhere in he hundreds of thousands of pages of laws there is one little paragraph tucked away somewhere that makes it impossible to sue them over this issue.
I didn’t have it happen on that contest, but I did have 2 of my judge votes flip the other way. Took about 5 clicks to finally make it correct. Olathe, KS
Minnesota was one state. Premarked ballots in “abandoned” cars “found” during recounts.
I think the fraudsters are somehow using a maintenance or setup menu on the machines to configure it to register votes incorrectly.
I think if they had access to the deep innards of the system, they would configure it to alter the vote “silently” - that is, the screen would show an ‘R’ vote, but would internally change some of those votes to ‘D’.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.