Posted on 04/29/2014 8:03:13 PM PDT by absentee
UCLA (pron. “uk-lah”) turned down a couple million donation from Sterling for research, because he doesn’t fit in with the slick PR version of what UCLA wants everyone to believe about UCLA. Sterling has not had a sterling reputation for years already, but the publicity for this particular thing has been enormous — other than the FACT that Don Sterling is a LIFELONG DEMOCRAT.
One wonders why she “needed” more than one vehicle, and where they are, considering he probably has a car sent over for her.
Sterling was trying to hide assets— hiding these properties away from his wife, who was suing him for divorce over this witch, so that he could reduce his real holdings, and thereby affect a lesser settlement to the wife.
The wife, who is not a dunce, discovered the obvious. :)
Sterling was trying to hide assets— hiding these properties away from his wife, who was suing him for divorce over this witch, so that he could reduce his real holdings, and thereby affect a lesser settlement to the wife.
The wife, who is not a dunce, discovered the obvious. :)
it is Machiavellian.
Thanks RitaOK.
Sports leagues are closed communities in which participants sign on to the rules of operation. Sterling signed on to those rules. He’s got every right to challenge the rules, but if those rules prevail, then we come back to: Sterling signed on to the rules.
I don’t see it as any different than signing on to the rules of any private organization. I don’t see it as a matter of “rights”.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.