Posted on 10/27/2013 1:36:35 PM PDT by DanMiller
Quite right. Thank you.
Thank you for clarifying that for any lurkers who may not have realized why it applies.
And........?
It really doesn't matter, since you posted in in "Bloggers and Personal" the place where this kind of stuff is supposed to be posted. I wouldn't lose a single wink of sleep over it.
I do not see this coming to a civil war because there is no geographic locus to the protest. Even in South Carolina, there is an enormous number of democrat voters and in California an enormous number of republican voters. There are red and blue states, but the reds and blues are so intermixed throughout the nation that nothing comparable to the Civil War could so take the electorate of any state that they would subscribe to some kind of secession and organized combat action.
Something more like a revolution would be a model, perhaps. I understand the US revolution had only about 25% of the population behind it. They fought a foreign power in a time of slow travel, though. We're talking about fighting amongst ourselves with relatively quick access.
I'm thinking more of insurgency. What do you think?
Freud was a crazy fool too
This is an excellent post!
"I can’t believe that you said something so crude."
LOL! I liked it!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.