Posted on 09/19/2013 6:16:17 PM PDT by LD Jackson
A small refinement on your excellent idea - let the dog himself remove the body part.
Now if they beat the heck out of him in the bushes, that’s more understandable.
Kinda like you don’t shoot a robber in the back from 100 yards.
Beating a pervert in the bushes outside of your daughters window is ok, but chasing the pervert down is not?
I'd chase the ( expletive deleted) down as well and put a big hurt on him KNOWING there are people like you who thinks running away means escaping righteous consequence.
I'd go to jail, but that's the last time that (expletive deleted) would ever be able to look in a window again.
I think we have medals for that in Texas
I’m trying to figure out how the father got caught. I would beat the guy unconscious, break his knees, and then get out of there. Anyway, now that the father has been charged, I certainly hope he and the others remember how the pervert yelled, “I’m getting a gun and coming back to kill you all!”, before he took off running.
“Kinda like you don’t shoot a robber in the back from 100 yards.”
Speak for yourself, I sure would kill him!!!
This case was made for jury nullification. Her dad did what? NOT GUILTY!!
Hold on my FRiend, I wouldn’t fault the dad if he chased the prep into his own house and beat the crap out of him there.. If he has his clothes to prove he had the right guy..
I will donate to his defense, and/or the recall if he is charged..
You’re right - that’s why mine’s sighted in for 500 yards. I want the SOB to die tired.
Even in Sweden this would have not been acceptable; there it is only ok to masterbate in public if you keep your eyes moving. If you keep staring at one or two people while stroking yourself you might make someone uncomfortable....
Why would that be? Obviously he did the crime, getting shot from one yard on one hundred yards doesn't sound germane. What is all this fuss about propinquity? Sounds like lawyer talk to me, not common sense.
Isn’t this an Old story? I thought I read a couple weeks ago that they had decided not to charge the guy for beating up the peeping tom.
Ah, he HAD been released, but now has been charged.
Kinda like you don’t shoot a robber in the back from 100 yards.
“Kinda like you don’t shoot a robber in the back from 100 yards”
I would not shoot someone in such a case, but in Washington State it is sometimes okay (okay, it was 100+ feet, not yards).
http://union-bulletin.com/news/2012/aug/13/walla-walla-prosecutor-will-not-file-charges/
Excerpt:
A six-person coroner’s inquest jury ruled Friday that Saul committed a justifiable homicide. The ruling by a majority of jurors came after two days of testimony from law enforcement officers and a forensic pathologist.
According to a Walla Walla County Sheriff’s Office investigation conducted by Detective Sgt. Gary Bolster, Chavira broke into the New York Store at roughly 2:30 a.m. on May 4. According to testimony from Walla Walla police officers, Saul stated Chavira threatened him during the burglary.
Bolster’s investigation showed that Saul fired his 12-gauge shotgun five times at a distance between 120 and 155 feet, striking Chavira in the back with nearly 50 pellets of No. 4 buckshot. Chavira was in the street outside the store when Saul fired the shots.
In a letter stating his decision not to prosecute, Nagle stated the Washington State Legislature and Supreme Court have “made it clear that” a person should not be charged with murder or manslaughter “when they are defending themselves, their property, or against a felony, unless the prosecution has sufficient evidence to prove the absence of any of the defenses to a jury beyond a reasonable doubt.”
Nagle also pointed out the slayer does not have to prove the homicide was justifiable. According to Nagle, the jury must be convinced “beyond any reasonable doubt that a person was not defending themselves, their property or against a felony.”
Another reason to eschew Washington...
You need to read it again. The victim of the burglary was NOT charged with any crime. In Washington it is legal to use deadly force to prevent a felony. Including preventing the person from running away with your stuff.
But can you scuttle them if you don’t like the cut of their jib?
“Well, the truth is he had something in his hand, and I thought it was a weapon”.
If you are beating off outside my kids window, expect a beat down. If I’m on the jury, he walks.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.