Posted on 07/08/2013 5:10:03 PM PDT by IChing
Looks to me like he's only here to promote himself at our expense.
You OK with that?
As I said, it is decent - in fact excellent - original content, and IChing participates in the threads, so yup. 100% OK with it. If he gets some hits, great!
Good conservative writers should be encouraged. We desperately need more of them.
CYA! PUNT!
Ya know though, this isn’t my house. It isn’t yours either. Lets defer to the person who created and owns this house, if he cares to comment: Mr. Robinson, respectfully, what say you?
But you re able to just barely eke out enough time to write your own stuff and post it here.
Curious how that works, isn't it?
Why, if it weren't for your obvious ivory-pure intentions, one might almost think you were only about self promotion.
Thank you.
Seems my first option was true. He wasn’t ‘high’ on pot.
I've read all his articles, on the several threads he started, and not once have I clicked to go to his website. So... I don't see that we are 'expending' anything.
Thank you, piytar! Some day I do hope to make a dime or to at it somehow (not a single penny to me now for this stuff), and the encouragement in forums like here definitely is what keeps me working at developing whatever it is that it takes to do that.
Jeff Head promotes his books on here. What's the difference ?
I told this one crank on the FR Facebook page who was giving me the same grief that ClashDaily.com is seemingly always on the lookout for new writers, and that he might direct his energies to trying his hand at it himself instead of just sniping at others who are doing the work. lol
Actually, methinks it might be the same crank.
no difference..it just allows Humblegunner to don his thong and shoot bottle rockets at himself
America Has Talent type stuff
wet grass!?? Does it make a sound?
lmao BARF
I don’t understand why they haven’t done a demonstration tape recording of Zimmerman screaming “help, help” just like during the event. They could play both and ask Traydmark’s mom which one was her son. The jury could hear that it was the same person. Is there a difficulty in re-creating the kind of screaming he made that night?
The potheads are going balistic with their denials.
..and it’s not MY blog(unless one means I’m associated with it), it’s the premier up-and-coming conservative mosh pit led by Hannah Giles’(of the duo with James O’Keefe who, working with Andrew Breitbart, brought down ACORN posing as prostitute & pimp) pastor dad, Doug. Based on a Facebook comment I made, DG asked me to contribute a column during the Christopher Dorner episode last Feb., then invited me to keep posting. I may be helping DG make money, or even JimRob to draw interest/donations a tiny bit here, but beyond that it’s just my own vanity and my desire to spread the word on topics of mutual interest here that motivates me.
The judge originally barred any mention of the MJ in opening statements as it went to character testimony, which (in my understanding) isn't admissible unless someone says what a great guy he was. Then the opposition can bring in evidence of bad character to refute it.
Also, the ME originally said that the low level of MJ wouldn't have any effect on TM. During testimony last week, the idiot ME (thank you, God) changed his mind and said it might have an effect.
That opened the door for the defense to bring in the MJ use, not as a character defect, but as possible evidence of TM’s behavior that night.
For those who know more about this than I do, would the low level of MJ in Trayvon be significant if it was evidence that he was in withdrawal since his usual suppliers were back in Miami?
I’d consider it worth a go, but then again it might just be a distraction when the prosecution witnesses already have major holes in their story anyway. It might not be needed.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.