Skip to comments.
Chevy Volt Sales Plunge – Obama’s Flagship EV a Failure
NLPC ^
| April 3, 2013
| Mark Modica
Posted on 04/03/2013 10:39:46 AM PDT by jazusamo
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40 next last
1
posted on
04/03/2013 10:39:46 AM PDT
by
jazusamo
To: All
2
posted on
04/03/2013 10:40:37 AM PDT
by
jazusamo
("Mercy to the guilty is cruelty to the innocent." -- Adam Smith)
To: jazusamo
“Chevy Spark”
Thats funny considering all the volts that caught fire in peoples garages. Why dont they just call it the flaming piece of $h!t?
3
posted on
04/03/2013 10:44:34 AM PDT
by
V_TWIN
(obama=where there's smoke, there's mirrors)
To: V_TWIN
It’s amazing to me they’d come up with a name like Spark, maybe it was Obama’s brainstorm:)
4
posted on
04/03/2013 10:48:02 AM PDT
by
jazusamo
("Mercy to the guilty is cruelty to the innocent." -- Adam Smith)
To: jazusamo
The Volt meets the Zot.
5
posted on
04/03/2013 10:48:40 AM PDT
by
JPG
(Stay strong.)
To: V_TWIN
Thats funny considering all the volts that caught fire in peoples garages. They could have named it "the Chevy Fireball."
6
posted on
04/03/2013 10:49:21 AM PDT
by
Steely Tom
(If the Constitution can be a living document, I guess a corporation can be a person.)
To: jazusamo
To: jazusamo
Obamobiles
8
posted on
04/03/2013 10:53:20 AM PDT
by
oldbrowser
(They are marxists, don't call them democrats)
To: jazusamo
9
posted on
04/03/2013 10:55:15 AM PDT
by
Darksheare
(Try my coffee, first one's free.....)
To: Darksheare
What a hoot, haven’t seen that.
10
posted on
04/03/2013 10:57:09 AM PDT
by
jazusamo
("Mercy to the guilty is cruelty to the innocent." -- Adam Smith)
Please bump the Freepathon or click above and donate or become a monthly donor!
11
posted on
04/03/2013 10:57:31 AM PDT
by
jazusamo
("Mercy to the guilty is cruelty to the innocent." -- Adam Smith)
To: jazusamo
They played it as a radio ad here.
Hard to believe, it’s even dumber in video form.
12
posted on
04/03/2013 10:58:17 AM PDT
by
Darksheare
(Try my coffee, first one's free.....)
To: oldbrowser
They all come with front end alignment that constantly pulls to the LEFT even when it knows it’s wrong and will damage our country.
13
posted on
04/03/2013 10:59:13 AM PDT
by
V_TWIN
(obama=where there's smoke, there's mirrors)
To: jazusamo
14
posted on
04/03/2013 11:03:04 AM PDT
by
exit82
("The Taliban is on the inside of the building" E. Nordstrom 10-10-12)
To: jazusamo
My two cents (adjusted for inflation, actual value may be less):
The diesel-electric hybrid propulsion concept has more than 60 years of proven market acceptance in the form of Railroad Locomotives. There are certain economies of scale and size in this arena.
I look at the Volt's technology (not the political baggage) and see some things with promise. The costs are not low enough yet, etc, etc.
So, it sort of reminds me of the first few "Digital Personal Assistants" back in the 90's. Anyone remember the Apple Newton? It was laughable, but it was the kernel that led to the iPhone and all the other marketplace handheld computer-like devices.
My objections to the Volt lie largely with the Government subsidies, followed by the market objection of cost versus benefit.
Electric cars will need a breakthru in battery storage to get them to make the leap to commercial market acceptance. All the other engineering problems have pretty much been taken care of.
15
posted on
04/03/2013 11:06:21 AM PDT
by
Rebel_Ace
(Tags?!? Tags?!? We don' neeeed no stinkin' Tags!)
To: jazusamo
Thanks for providing a reminder to never to buy a Government Motors car.
I hadn’t thought about it in a while....
16
posted on
04/03/2013 11:07:01 AM PDT
by
PGR88
To: Rebel_Ace
Locomotives use diesel electric because they have to drive all the wheels (steel on steel coefficient is quite low, in the range of .1)
A mechanical system to drive that many wheels is not practical/economical.
17
posted on
04/03/2013 11:09:58 AM PDT
by
nascarnation
(Baraq's economic policy: trickle up poverty)
To: jazusamo
I look forward to the MSM telling us all about this.
*crickets*
18
posted on
04/03/2013 11:10:40 AM PDT
by
a real Sheila
(R.I.P AMERICA 1776 - 2012)
To: Rebel_Ace
I agree, you stated it well.
The cost is too high for the average buyer. The subsidies and tax credits are outrageous and a huge breakthrough in battery tech is needed which may not be for a very long time if ever.
19
posted on
04/03/2013 11:15:44 AM PDT
by
jazusamo
("Mercy to the guilty is cruelty to the innocent." -- Adam Smith)
To: nascarnation
Well, yes, and that is why I said,
"...There are certain economies of scale and size in this arena..."
However, regardless of the number of wheels being driven, the CONCEPT of Internal Combustion mechanically driving a generator to send power to an Electric Drive Train is well established as fuel efficient and road worthy. That was my principle point, not to get lost in the many and varied differences between locomotives and personal transportation vehicles.
20
posted on
04/03/2013 11:19:07 AM PDT
by
Rebel_Ace
(Tags?!? Tags?!? We don' neeeed no stinkin' Tags!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson