Skip to comments.
Dianne Feinstein Assault Weapons Ban Could Be the Start Of a Total Gun Ban
PolicyMic ^
| January 26, 2013
| Matt MacBradaigh
Posted on 01/26/2013 12:53:18 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-57 next last
Mr. Obama is on record saying much the same thing, as are many other Democrats.
To: 2ndDivisionVet
A total gun ban would be the start of a war in the courts, politics and possibly civil war.
2
posted on
01/26/2013 12:59:39 PM PST
by
mountainlion
(Live well for those that did not make it back.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
The right of self defense is fundamental. We must do everything we can to drive people out of this country who oppose self defense.
3
posted on
01/26/2013 1:01:02 PM PST
by
muawiyah
To: mountainlion
An attempted, ‘Total Gun Ban’, would be the start of the shooting war.
4
posted on
01/26/2013 1:04:57 PM PST
by
Delta Dawn
(at)
To: Delta Dawn
Unfortunately a lot of people here advocate sending jobs out of the country.
A move which INCREASES the pressure against guns.
We need American jobs. And America freedom.
To: 2ndDivisionVet
It could also be the start of a backlash that increases gun ownership in a major way.
The Dem/libs have been engaging in a steady push to infringe on our right to keep and bear arms for decades. And this is how it has been working out for them in the last two decades...
- The percentage of Americans who own guns has increased.
- The percentage of Americans who believe we have a right to own guns has increased.
- The number of guns owned per gun owner has increased.
- The amount of ammunition possessed per gun owner has increased.
- Concealed carry laws have spread from state to state like wildfire.
- Castle Doctrine laws have been passed in numerous states that didn't have them.
- Stand Your Ground laws have been passed in more states than had them before.
- Gun rights lobbying groups have become a cottage industry unto themselves sprouting up like mushrooms after a rainstorm.
- In the worst economy since the Great Depression the firearms industry can't keep up with orders or expand fast enough.
And in the last two months...
If the lefties keep pushing gun control in another two decades one out of two Americans may be gun owners instead of one out of three.
MOLON LAVE! WE'LL BUY MORE. ;-)
6
posted on
01/26/2013 1:08:16 PM PST
by
TigersEye
(The irresponsible should not be leading the responsible.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
FTA: “Feinstein says this [confiscation] isn’t her intention.”
“Pull the other one, luv.”
7
posted on
01/26/2013 1:09:03 PM PST
by
Peet
(TurboTax: "So simple even a Secretary of the Treasury can run it!")
To: 2ndDivisionVet
When will people realize it is much easier to replace one politician in an election cycle than to control the populous.
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Ooohhhhhhhh Reeeeeeeeeeaaallllyyy?????? /s
To: mountainlion
10
posted on
01/26/2013 1:18:01 PM PST
by
Travis McGee
(www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Dianne Feinstein. Is a lier and its self evident.The words came right out of her mouth when she said thatif she could she would ban all “Assault Rifles”if she got the 51 votes.
With her you can be damn sure she’d be going after all guns after that.
THIS Woman is NOT to be trusted.
11
posted on
01/26/2013 1:19:11 PM PST
by
puppypusher
(The World is going to the dogs.)
To: Delta Dawn
An attempted,Total Gun Ban,would be the start of the shooting war. That's why oppresive regimes would do it a little bit at a time, the most effective defensive weapons first. By the time they propose a total ban, there are no means of resistance.
12
posted on
01/26/2013 1:20:58 PM PST
by
Washi
(PUSH BACK! Encourage your legislators to introduce pro-second amendment legislation.)
To: Delta Dawn
"An attempted, Total Gun Ban, would be the start of the shooting war."
And all this time I've been thinking it would be started by economic collapse & 'social unrest'.
Maybe I'm going to have to start re-thinking this, because more folks are really & truely p_ssed off,
the anger is obvious, as opposed to a sense of apathetic inevitability over our economy collapsing.
13
posted on
01/26/2013 1:21:32 PM PST
by
45semi
(A police state is always preceded by a nanny state...)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
It tee's me off knowing that these liberal POS’s are going out of their way to give illegal aliens the Rights of American citizens while at the same time denying our 2nd Amendment Rights that are guaranteed under the Bill of Rights
14
posted on
01/26/2013 1:25:07 PM PST
by
puppypusher
(The World is going to the dogs.)
To: All
15
posted on
01/26/2013 1:28:47 PM PST
by
BattleFlag
(The right to self defense, one without which none others matter)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
It appears that Dianne Feinstein should be banned from the human race.
16
posted on
01/26/2013 1:29:15 PM PST
by
bunkerhill7
(The Second Amendment has no limits on firepower.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Putting aside the fact that SCOTUS rulings would stop a band, no way that would get through the Senate and CERTAINLY not the House. This is a smokescreen to keep people from paying attention to what is really going on. Tis an old ploy ... allow a radical position to seep out so that something less radical, but radical nonetheless, seems tame.
To: 2ndDivisionVet
18
posted on
01/26/2013 1:30:40 PM PST
by
clamper1797
(De-throne King Obozo)
To: TigersEye
Thanksfor the post. I like the info.
19
posted on
01/26/2013 1:31:35 PM PST
by
Inyo-Mono
(My greatest fear is that when I'm gone my wife will sell my guns for what I told her I paid for them)
To: puppypusher
Sure, and “don’t ask, don’t tell” wasn’t a prelude to total repeal of the ban on homosexuals in the military.
And “civil unions” weren’t a prelude to homosexual “marriage”.
And women in combat units wasn’t a prelude to women on the front lines.
Alinsky rules. You take what you can get at any given point in time and then immediately start demanding the next step. You cannot compromise with the left. Phased-in surrender is still surrender.
20
posted on
01/26/2013 1:33:01 PM PST
by
littleharbour
("All men having power ought to be distrusted to a certain degree. ~ James Madison)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-57 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson