Posted on 01/20/2013 10:05:44 AM PST by ABrit
The random guy from Jamaica had an arrest warrant issued in Hawaii on the May 5, 1982, bearing number “BWO 050582.”
A prosecutor on April 9, 2003, (21 years later and just before Obama stood for Illinois Senate) filed an ex parte motion to recall the bench warrant and announced on the record “nolle prosequi.” This is a Latin phrase which is formally entered into a court record which means that the prosecutor in a criminal case “will no further prosecute” the case.
Why did the prosecutor quash a warrant on a nobody from Jamaica?
If Obama’s legal name and person was Bari Malik Shabazz he “Obama” was in criminal legal jeopardy. That’s why the warrant was quashed and Bari Shabazz’s legal existance terminated.
Obama had two or more parallel ID’s running.
“Why did the prosecutor quash a warrant on a nobody from Jamaica?”
Maybe he was dead? Maybe he cut a deal with the prosecutors? Maybe they do that automatically after a certain time with minor warrants, rather than clogging up the system?
Any of those would make more sense than that they “quashed” the warrant to protect Obama, when the warrant wasn’t in Obama’s name, so he had no danger of being arrested under it.
“If Obama’s legal name and person was Bari Malik Shabazz he “Obama” was in criminal legal jeopardy.”
Well, he wasn’t, so there was no jeopardy.
Smells like half/half black/white Kenyan born, Xed by Malcolm, changing name aliases as commie organizers, terorists did way back.
Now in power running country (down) and paving way for United Kalifat States.
Well if Shabazz was finger printed when arrested and Obama had the same prints, then Obama was in danger of arrest every time he was fingerprinted.
Well if Shabazz was finger printed when arrested and Obama had the same prints, then Obama was in danger of arrest every time he was fingerprinted.
Wouldn’t there be a mug shot of him when he was arrested?
Freedom of information request would find out?
“Well if Shabazz was finger printed when arrested and Obama had the same prints, then Obama was in danger of arrest every time he was fingerprinted.”
I really doubt that Obama has the same prints as some random guy from Kingston, Jamaica.
Under U.S. law the fleeing felon rule was limited to non-lethal force in most cases by Tennessee v. Garner, 471 U.S. 1 (1985). The justices held that deadly force “may not be used unless necessary to prevent the escape and the officer has probable cause to believe that the suspect poses a significant threat of death or serious physical injury to the officer or others.”
Fleeing felons may be followed into places not open to the public without a warrant if the officer is in “hot pursuit.” See Warden, Md. Penitentiary v. Hayden (1967), [2] 87 S.Ct. 1642, 18 L.Ed.2d 782.
Also, Interstate Flight is a felony against Federal Law.
“They wouldn’t know he was dead”
How do you know that? Maybe they cross-reference with the SSDI database, it wouldn’t be very hard to do.
“there’s no reason to suppose they “cut a deal””
It’s a more reasonable supposition than any of yours.
“I doubt if Courts cancel warrants for “failing to appear” under any circumstances relevant here.”
Is there a statute of limitations on “failure to appear”, or the original charge? It’s very likely that they cancel warrants after the statute has run out, since there would be no point to chasing people who you cannot prosecute.
“Maybe they cross-reference with the SSDI database, it wouldn’t be very hard to do.”
Even if they did, which I doubt, his death was never verified.
Is there a statute of limitation on failing to answer a warrant and interstate flight and falsifying a death record? Ask a lawyer or Google.
You seem very interested in Obambi not being a Shabazz don’t you?
Ah. I see it now. Obama/Shabazz was badly injured in the car crash. They used Saudi influence to get him treated at the CIA hospital at Quantico, thats why Shabazz’s address is changed from Elmhurst, New York, to Quantico.
Obama couldn’t produce a driving licence in that name because he wasn’t using that name, and the only license he had was was in the name of Bari Malik Shabazz, of New York.
Hi couldn’t be fingerprinted because his fingerprints were on the FBI wanted list.
He didn’t have a driving license in the name of Obama, because he couldn’t get one. No birth certificate.
The CIA wanted him in Pakistan. He spoke and wrote Arabic with a good accent. They sent him to Pakistan to liase with the Taliban.
Now where does Stanley Ann Dunham fit in in Pakistan. She was a CIA asset and that was her false identity? That’s why the spooks keep visiting anyone who publishes anything about Obama and SAD...
Obumpa
“Even if they did, which I doubt, his death was never verified.”
I don’t think anyone pays too much attention to whether something is “verified” in the SSDI. If the SSDI lists someone as dead, most organizations take their word for it.
“Is there a statute of limitation on failing to answer a warrant and interstate flight and falsifying a death record? Ask a lawyer or Google.”
I don’t need to, I know that there is a statute of limitations on pretty much every offense short of homicide, so it’s just a question of how long the statute is on those other charges.
“You seem very interested in Obambi not being a Shabazz don’t you?”
Hey, since I’m about the only one interested in your thread besides you, you shouldn’t look a gift horse in the mouth. I just wanted to let you know that you were on the wrong track, but you keep posting replies to me, so I have responded. If you don’t want to hear from me, then stop pinging me.
“Regardless of the applicable statute of limitations, the period may be extended or the running of the period suspended or tolled under a number of circumstances such as when the accused is a fugitive..”
“..no statute of limitations shall extend to any person fleeing from justice,” 18 U.S.C. 3290)”
The USC is Federal law, it doesn’t have anything to do with crimes under Hawaii state law. Here’s what I found on Hawaii:
http://statelaws.findlaw.com/hawaii-law/hawaii-criminal-statute-of-limitations-laws.html
It looks like in Hawaii, the statute of limitations for “misdemeanor or parking violation” is 2 years, and “petty misdemeanors” are 1 year, and the warrants on Shabazz would have fallen into one of those categories.
Now, the statue in Hawaii does get suspended, in these circumstances:
“Continuously absent from state or no reasonably ascertainable residence or work within the state, while prosecution is pending: maximum extension 4 yrs.”
So, that reads to me that the maximum it could have been extended was 4 years. Add 2 years to that for the maximum statute of limitations for his violations, and after 6 years, Mr. Shabazz should have been in the clear, as far the state of Hawaii was concerned.
Not buying the whole scenario, but suppose he was in bad accident with injuries. That would explain the strange scars on his head.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.