Not exactly a face that inspires confidence.
Deace is a Ron Paul supporter -- so "civil war" is in his own interest.
The rest of the party will muddle through and try to hold things together.
Posted on 11/07/2012 9:40:48 PM PST by Kevmo
Well, now I can understand where you are coming from...
But, please do not lump us all into the same pot because of a bad experience on a website...
there are nut jobs everywhere, and there are clueless everywhere, including the republican party, and yes, even some conservatives...
and just for the record, i thought and still think ron paul is a nut job...
and anyone who is jubilant over fubo being reelected is NOT a libertarian, they are trolls...
I would appreciate a link or name of said website, I would not hesitate to give them a piece of my mind..
No I read it, and because of fatigue and bad formatting on your part, I misinterpreted it, your follow up posts didn’t help but it is revealing that you keep wanting to hammer on it and keep coming at me like a kid.
Why the badgering and persistent attitude?
because it took that much effort to get you to read one paragraph, but you took far more time to compose posts that were obviously in the weeds
blaming it on formatting, that’s incredibly lame
You are a rare egg, usually those like you are democrats, massively democrat.
Evangelicals voted republican by 79%, pretty much typical for those that you despise, the anti-Christian trash, are about an 80% Obama vote.
Evangelicals are the only true opposition to the left, and they cause rage in you.
Now you are simply lying and continuing an attack.
I read the post, and I just told you that I read it.
Since this is clearly personal, why don’t you drop the facade and just lay out your problem, you clearly have some baggage with me that you want to unload, how about cluing me in so that I can respond?
What you wrote in Post #74:
Cute nonsense, but
but some horse hockey that showed you didn’t read the paragraph.
So what you’ve been feeding us freepers on this thread is cute nonsense yourself. You even admit it. You blame it on poor formatting. You’re too lazy to go upthread to see for yourself but need it spooonfed back to you so you can be “clued in”. You wanna call that baggage and “clearly personal”, but it ain’t personal, it’s yet another piece of garbage you’re feeding us freepers. You’re basically pretty useless in this thread.
Oh, and you accuse another freeper of lying. Was I lying when I said your excuse was incredibly lame?
You clearly have some personal ax to grind with me, some baggage that you are dragging into this thread.
Why not get to the truth, what is it about my political posts that you disagree with but won’t address, why do you keep launching into personal attack after personal attack, but will not tell me the politics that you are disagreeing with.
Do I have to look it up? Are you some kind of angry romneybot who doesn’t approve of my views of Mitt?
Not exactly a face that inspires confidence.
Deace is a Ron Paul supporter -- so "civil war" is in his own interest.
The rest of the party will muddle through and try to hold things together.
Why not get to the truth, what is it about my political posts that you disagree with but won’t address, why do you keep launching into personal attack after personal attack, but will not tell me the politics that you are disagreeing with.
***More cute nonsense from you. If you just apologize to the freepers on this thread for not reading the paragraph properly, continuing with that mistake by posting rather than reading it, then making it worse by accusing me of making it personal, and finally by accusing me of lying when there’s no reason to go down that path... then I will drop it. It has nothing to do with whatever you’ve posted in the past. It is all in this thread. Man up.
Not exactly a face that inspires confidence.
***Like me, he has the looks for radio.
You are lying, you keep posting that I didn’t read, when I told you that I did, once you were corrected you should have dropped that, but you only persisted with it.
You are ridiculously personal, I posted that I had been tired when I read your cut and paste, and to you, rather than recognizing that people can misinterpret a post, you have gone into a radical personal attack that doesn’t make any sense.
You seem to want to avoid all political discussion and keep posting this girlish personal stuff over and over.
Aside from your personal feelings that a freeper misread one of your posts, name something political that I have posted on this thread that you disagree with.
My anger is reserved for the huge number of Republicans, whether evangelicals or not, who failed to vote, and only those. It has been reported, here on FR, and elsewhere that 14 million evangelicals stayed home on election day. I do not know whether or not that number is accurate, but if it is, then I have no respect for those 14 million. I certainly have no issue whatsoever with anyone, evangelical or not who voted to save our nation from the Poseur.
Your statistic is unclear to me. It appears to mean that of the evangelicals that turned out, 79% voted for Romney. Great, I thank each and every one of those voters. Your statistic says nothing about the total size of the evangelical vote and how many of them appeared at the polls.
Great post
So you did go back and read what the paragraph? Then why did you continue with the track you were on, the one where you supposedly “misread” the original paragraph.
Dude. Just apologize. Quit calling another freeper a liar. Man up.
To your questions:
Would you characterize Romney as a socon? You must be joking! Of course not.
As a fiscon? Your joking around continues! No.
Why is it that JimRob had a Romneytruthfile on the ‘masthead’ for so long? Why do you think? Check out my primary period posts. I have never been a Romney fan. But I did want the poseur gone. Still do.
So are you a fiscon who is anti-socon? No, I am not anti socon. My issue with you is that you seem to think that socon issues trump fiscon issues, and they do not. I am pro-winning. Socons often don't seem to care about winning, just self-defeating trumpeting. My issue with socons, if I have one at all, is that pushing socon issues ahead of fiscon issues means that we can't get anywhere on either front. You can't win anything if you are dead. I think that we cannot influence policy unless we can win. And there is no way to win on socon issues if as a nation we are being killed at the hands of the statists. I'm here trying to preserve our Republic for my kids and grandkids. What are YOU doing here?
If so, what are you doing here? Explained above.
Only a liberal idiot that knows nothing about politics, could post such a ridiculous thing.
Evangelicals are the right wing in America, Evangelicals are the econ conservatives, social conservatives, defense conservatives, the true conservatives.
Evangelicals voted 79% republican, and increased their share of the republican vote to 24%.
You anti-Christian types were voting for Obama by 75% to 80%.
Get a clue dude.
My anger is reserved for the huge number of Republicans, whether evangelicals or not, who failed to vote, and only those.
***Then you are here to pound down christians in the name of the GOP, because some of them didn’t vote for your GOP-elitist snob liberal. FR is not a GOP website. It IS an evangelical, Pro-God website. That means what you’re doing is trolling. You ain’t a conservative.
I know of Steve Deace. This man is crazy and he voted for Obama last time. I have no idea who he voted for this time as I refuse to listen to him. The man is destructive just to stroke his own pompous ego.
When did you stop beating your wife ? What ? You’ve never so much as laid a finger on her ? Doesn’t matter. Just tell everyone you messed up.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.