Posted on 09/07/2012 9:12:24 AM PDT by Oldpuppymax
About par for that blog.
A good point, but then they can’t go up the St. Lawrence either to get to the Great Lakes, if my memory serves me correctly.
This would draw water in from the other Great Lakes.
I would think Canada would sue.
Next thing you know they’ll be after our precious bodily fluids.
Lake Huron and Lake Michigan are effectively two lobes of the same lake; you can’t lower the level of one without lowering the level of the other.
Combined, they have a surface area of roughly 45,000 square miles.
To lower the level of the combined lakes ONE INCH would require removing roughly ONE CUBIC MILE of water.
Many are the ones that would sell it all for money. Of course planning to go to Europe or another land to secure their food.
Water is a necessity, as is food.
Tell the people of Ukraine it could not happen!
There is a fool born every minute, so we must be wise.
God bless America.
So, if the government is to confiscate Nestle’s rights to the water on its own property, should it at the same time confiscate other privately owned mineral rights? Perhaps private entities shouldn’t be permitted to own and develope oil or coal or natural gas or iron ore or copper or gravel either.
it speaks volumes when the majority of commenters on this thread actually believe there’s any truth to this ludicrous nonsense.
Sigh.
“Coach is a nutter.”
dot com.
I actually thought this was a parody/satire till I saw it was the "coachisright" blog - they're a bigger bunch of imbeciles than Wing Nut Daily.
I actually thought this was a parody/satire till I saw it was the "coachisright" blog - they're a bigger bunch of imbeciles than Wing Nut Daily.
Are you communist? Marxist?
Are you aware that water barrels are coming under scrutiny in many states, including Illinois?
Isn’t ironic that Illinois is exporting water, while making laws to prevent its citizens from conserving water?
http://www.harvesth2o.com/statues_regulations.shtml
OK, upon a more calm consideration, it's apparent that your comments on this thread have been satirical. You had me there for a second.
As I've mentioned before there are so many impossibly stupid blog posts out there (and FR replies, for that matter) it's increasingly more difficult to tell satire from idiocy.
It’s called ‘free trade’.
Corporations are allowed to loot natural resources from citizens to enhance the economies of communist dictators.
That’s what ‘free trade’ is all about.
In the mean time China funds eco nuts to sue to prevent water resources from being developed in this country, hence the reason most of the west is on water rationing in the summer time.
In crooked globalist politics— both political parties offend and harm citizens!
Under the Constitution, individuals have rights, not corporations.
Corporations, like the environment, have no rights. American citizens are the only entities that have legal binding rights in a constitutional republic.
Your comment is very troubling considering Nestle isn’t even an American company anymore, but is demanding ‘rights’ as a globalist entity that harm American citizens.
Let me clarify for you.
American citizens have unalienable rights from the creator.
Corporations exist when the are granted charters from the citizens with the unalienable rights.
This charter does not transfer rights to non human entities as you pretend it does.
The charter can also be revoked by the citizens with unalienable rights. Which is what we should do to Nestle for violating the trust of the American people.
You could be a communist or Marxist because you are defending the collective(Nestle corporation) against individual rights.
I just noticed a grain of sand is missing from Santa Monica Beach. I bet Obama gave it to the chinese.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.