Skip to comments.
New paper blames about half of global warming on weather station data homogenization
Watts Up With That? ^
| July 17, 2012
| Anthony Watts
Posted on 07/17/2012 10:46:23 PM PDT by Rocky
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-26 last
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
The solution to Glowbull Warming is so easy! If we could lock up Algore and put a ball gag on him that would eliminate the other half. lol
21
posted on
07/20/2012 3:48:12 PM PDT
by
TigersEye
(Life is about choices. Your choices. Make good ones.)
To: PapaBear3625
Exactly!
I always ask global warming folks why they think they know, within 1 degree even, the average world temperature in 1850. How many stations were there in the Yukon in 1850? How many in the Amazon? How many reading taken from the middle of the Pacific in 1850? How accurate were the gauges, and who thinks some guy in Alaska in the winter of 1850 was getting readings accurate to 1 degree, let alone 0.01 degree?
They just reply, “Science has proved...”
22
posted on
07/20/2012 4:03:52 PM PDT
by
Mr Rogers
(Liberalism: "Ex faslo quodlibet" - from falseness, anything follows)
To: SunkenCiv
Plus we have continued reductions of stations in the northern hemisphere, and many relocated within UHC (urban heat centers), placed next to air conditioning outlets, sitting on airport tarmacs, etc..
I know most here at this point know these facts, but just in case we have some beginners that are just getting on board.
23
posted on
07/20/2012 4:26:21 PM PDT
by
Marine_Uncle
(Honor must be earned.)
To: Mr Rogers
I always ask global warming folks why they think they know, within 1 degree even, the average world temperature in 1850. How many stations were there in the Yukon in 1850? How many in the Amazon? Exactly. More to the point, the whole idea of "average world temperature" is useless. What's useful, from a human point of view, is measuring the degree to which temperatures diverge from what is optimal for humans, and where.
The assumption here is that (1) there is warming, and (2) warming is always bad. If winters become less harsh in the Yukon and Siberia, and temps stay much the same elsewhere, then that would be considered "global warming", but it would be a GOOD thing.
24
posted on
07/20/2012 5:40:08 PM PDT
by
PapaBear3625
(If I can't be persuasive, I at least hope to be fun.)
To: Marine_Uncle
As George Carlin said in one of his routines, “it’s 82 degrees at the airport. Which is stupid, because no one lives at the airport.”
25
posted on
07/21/2012 7:30:28 AM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
To: SunkenCiv
Tell GISS Hansen that. :)
26
posted on
07/21/2012 11:49:38 AM PDT
by
Marine_Uncle
(Honor must be earned.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-26 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson