Posted on 04/20/2012 9:50:38 AM PDT by smoothsailing
“Their motivation to do so was unclear”
Here’s how that works in similir situations:
The troops are told “Command want results and the political heat off!”
“We’re looking to you to make that happen!”
“Any questions?”
No need to mention any positive or negative incentives.
Good point. My perspective my be a bit scewd. I saw it happen twice in 10 years. Of course as you say new evidence was presented in both cases. Hmm, maybe I should have picked a better crowd to hang around...all these guys I knew getting in trouble..YIKES :-)
No one should be punished for perjury in this country after the media, congress and the people let Bill Clinton off scot free. If I was on a jury in a perjury trial I would never vote to convict.
ping me when Col. Sean Sullivan receives some form of punishment. Until then, this is just CYA posturing by the Brass to divert attention from their own malfeasance. These guys are indeed despicable, but they were led and used by the prosecution to get the others.
I would be delighted to do so, Sullivan is a detestable weasel.
I dunno - sounds like you’re in the “in a world of blind men, the one-eyed man is king” scenario! Gotta stay positive! Have a good weekend.
Colonel, USAFR
Agree, tarheelswamprat.
I have a sneaking suspicion if SSGt Wuterich had been convicted based on their testimony, nothing would have happened to these two Marines.
Thanks for posting this. Needless to say these two “scumbags” deserve nothing less than a dishonorable discharge and loss of all benefits. They lied to save their own asses and made life a living hell for 6 years for our family.
Yes, the government was determined to get somebody’s scalp to save face.
Good on ya, Mr. Puckett!
jafusafr: "...its unlawful command influence for SECNAF to direct an administrative discharge - thats the decision of the unit commander, to be acted on by the Special Court Martial Convening Authority. As a former military defense counsel, Id have a ball with the procedural aspects of that case. Two wrongs dont make a right is perfectly applicable here..."
Noted. Thank you.
Note to self.
This is the same Navy Secretary who decided to stick to his decision to “Name Warship for Murtha Despite Protests”.
http://www.military.com/news/article/ship-to-bear-murtha-name-despite-dissent.html
Navy Secretary Ray Mabus.
Absolutely, Mom. I hope they get the max.
Since it’s an ADSEP, I believe the best we can hope for is a General Discharge Under Other Than Honorable Conditions and forfeiture of all benefits. It will serve them right, even though they deserve worse.
As always, all the best to you and yours. :)
Grrrrrrr.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.