Posted on 03/13/2012 3:39:58 PM PDT by rxsid
In Dreams (for what it’s worth) even bozo himself admits his parents “marriage” was a bit hazy.
Consider this - She and Lolo were getting married and moving to Indonesia. Lolo had to adopt the kid to get him into school, etc. He couldn't do that unless there was some sort of legal paperwork to show the Indonesian officials. Remember, the divorce and 2nd marriage were done within days. Actually, there was some discrepancy in SADO's passport applications of the marriage date vs divorce so that was another oopsie in trying to keep the lies straight. So, Ann gets a "divorce" to make Indonesia and the US authorities happy. Then a few years later when she ships the 10 year old back to HI, the Dunhams have to begrudgingly host Sr.'s Magical Mystery Return to repair the bogus paper trail.
I remember reading on FR that (apparently) Zero went to Kenya in ‘82 but this visit was not part of the official myth; is my memory wrong?
Also, it seems (to me) unlikely that since Malik “grew up” with and remembers the original BHO, that the clan doesn’t really think Zero is the son of the Kenyan. But it sure brings them a bit of fame, no doubt monies, and perhaps they’ve had pressure put on them in other ways as well. So, “yes, he’s our village boy, yessirree!”
If the dark boy, the original BHO, had never lived in Kenya, then their belief that Zero was actually the son of the Kenyan might be plausible, despite to complete lack of any resemblance. But....
Even if you were born in the Lincoln bedroom without a US citizen father, you aren't a NBC.
-----------------------------------------------------
It appears that the author (Penbrook) is well aware that he isn't a NBC, even though he applied for and was given a HI COLB all the while having been born in Australia. He's being facicious with that statement.
This graphic, and the following is posted on his blog, indicates he knows he's not an NBC.
"Preventing an individual with plural loyalties, whether by biological, political or geographic origins, which may present lawful or perceptable doubt as to his allegiances thereof, other than one with the fullmost sovereignty of advanced citizenry, which is that of one who remains Natural-born from conception to election, from assuming the great power of this fragile office, was, without tolerance or vulnerability, the exaction of purpose of our fathers to induce the mandate of presidential eligibility upon our blood-ransomed Constitution..." Pen Johannson
I wouldn’t consider that proof of anything, knowing that guys history of “not telling the truth.”
1961 HI? At this point, who knows. Possible I suppose.
“McCain was born in Panama in 1936, while regionally under the jurisdiction of the United States following the construction of the Panama Canal, to two U.S. citizen parents who were living there while his father was serving in the U.S. military.”
This statement is a LIE AND A BUNCH OF CRAP!!!!
Panama Juan WAS BORN IN COLON HOSPITAL, COLON, REPUBLIC OF PANAMA. COLON WAS NEVER, EVER UNDER THE JURISDICTION OF THE U.S. Having been born in Colon, Republic of Panama Juan is a dual citizen as I am also.
I stopped reading at that point.
That’s the point. There’s no proof. Only allegations, assumptions.
Please read my post #108.
Thank you.
This statement is a LIE AND A BUNCH OF CRAP!!!!
Panama Juan WAS BORN IN COLON HOSPITAL, COLON, REPUBLIC OF PANAMA. COLON WAS NEVER, EVER UNDER THE JURISDICTION OF THE U.S. Having been born in Colon, Republic of Panama Juan is a dual citizen as I am also.
I stopped reading at that point."
Perhaps you'd consider continue reading. The author was corrected on that point yesterday, by Beckwith, and accepted it:
"Beckwith Mar 13, 2012 03:21 PM
John McCain was NOT born in the Panama Canal Zone as stated in this article.John Sidney McCain III was born at the Colon Hospital, located at Avenida Melendez and 2nd Street, Manzanillo Island, City of Colon, Republic of Panama. The time of birth on the birth certificate issued by Panama Railroad Company (that owned the Colon Hospital) was 5:25 PM and the day and date of birth was Saturday, August 29, 1936"
Penbrook One Mar 13, 2012 03:36 PM
Thank you. The impetus of SR511 was that his parents were both U.S. citizens. Your clarifications are much appreciated.
That would be Jael, the mother of George, and who lives in the US. George is the one who's dirt poor back in Kenya. Jael has been living in the US for years. Is she here legally or illegally like Aunt Zeituni and Uncle Omar?
Is there any evidence for the letter from the Kenyan about the wife and son other than “auntie” Zeituni’s words?
If it is “best evidence” in federal court, it could sway the trier of fact to conclude that BHO Sr. was married and the SADO marriage was bigamous, IMO. Kezia is still alive, BTW and could be persuaded to testify if it would save Obama’s citizenship by getting him declared born out-of-wedlock.
Only if SCOTUS adopts the claim by Obama's lawyers that the 9th Circuit Marguet-Pillado case makes Barry NBC could Barry's eligibility survive a Kenyan birth. Liars like BHO Sr. tend to lie opportunistically to gain some kind of personal benefit.
What possible motive would BHO Sr., who was dead broke, have for asking Mboya to look after his wife back in Kenya it he had been divorced in Kenya? Mboya, his fellow tribesman, would almost certainly have known whether BHO Sr. was married to Kezia or not.
I don’t believe that mix and match between tribal, Civil/Christian or Muslim marriages was allowed.
See Kenya Marriage Act of 1902 paragraph #49:
49. Whoever contracts a marriage under this Act, being at the time married in accordance with native law or custom or in accordance with Mohammedan law to any person other than the person with whom such marriage is contracted, shall be guilty of an offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years.
kenyalaw.org/family/statutes/...?file=The+marriage+act.pdf
him calling someone “wife” from tribal Kenya VS. a HI court document...I’m thinking the “best evidence” would be the HI court document.
“him calling someone wife from tribal Kenya VS. a HI court document...Im thinking the best evidence would be the HI court document.”
Currently, the best evidence record which is now in the GA court (that trumps all the foregoing) is the INS record of deportation on suspicion of bigamy. That alone is evidence that the US Gov’t in 1964 had sufficient direct and circumstantial evidence to believe BHO Sr. was married BOTH in Kenya AND in HI.
HI is one of the states that doesn't recognize such marriages.
It's plausible they simply didn't recognize the other alleged marriage.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.