Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama's Attorney Jablonski Slapped Down By Georgia SOS Over Obama's Ballot Access Hearing
obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com ^ | 1/25/12 | breitbart

Posted on 01/25/2012 5:57:22 PM PST by Mr. K

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-157 next last
To: butterdezillion

If you say so.


61 posted on 01/25/2012 7:11:48 PM PST by Ron H. (We are witnessing the beginning of the end!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: SeaHawkFan
More likely that Jablonski has decided he isn’t going to risk getting disbarred or going to prison by filing documents he knows to be fradulent.

I am impatiently waiting for someone to submit the BC to a court and have it properly and thoroughly challenged and questioned...who shall be the fall guy, Jablonski?

Are they sleeping well in Hawaii tonight? What a fire in the HDOH vault? How could that happen?

62 posted on 01/25/2012 7:14:03 PM PST by rolling_stone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hydrazine

“then go for summary judgment...”

Apologies for nit-picking since we hope for the same outcome. If legal, I hope the judge conducts a full hearing, allowing the Plaintiffs to introduce arguments and evidence into the record, and then rules on the merits after careful, lengthy, consideration. IMO, a summary judgment would be much easier for Obama to explain away, and easier for the SOS to weasel out of, than one of Judge Malihi’s clear and well-reasoned rulings. If the SOS does find against Obama, Jablonski will appeal to regular State Court (i.e., a pre-selected Democratic party-hack judge). Much better to have a mountain of facts backing the case than a simple no-show.


63 posted on 01/25/2012 7:15:34 PM PST by Chewbarkah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion
...lawyers let Savannah Guthrie feel the seal...

Ehhhhwwwww!

64 posted on 01/25/2012 7:16:18 PM PST by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: thecodont

I was in Atlanta downtown the day the police officers were acquitted in the Rodney King case. Believe me, you don’t want to be white while in Atlanta is President Trainwreck is cast off the ballot.


65 posted on 01/25/2012 7:16:29 PM PST by The_Media_never_lie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: SeaHawkFan
On top of that, his attorney is not going to submit documents he knows to be fraudulent. Jablonski is not going to go to prison and get disbarred for Obama. That's the real reason Jablonski is not going to be at the hearing.
_________________________________________

Jablonski is definitely between a rock and hard place. Apparently, being held in contempt for failing to appear tomorrow looks to Jablonski like the better option. Not much sleep tonight for the patsy Jablonski. Just another dupe Obama has put in jeopardy.

66 posted on 01/25/2012 7:17:50 PM PST by iontheball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Georgia Girl 2

What I’d give to have been a ‘fly on the wall’ when Obama’s lawyer reported back to him! LOL.

[I hope they lack the intelligence to show up at that hearing tomorrow.]

I do too GG, we’ve waited so long for some good news out of all of this.


67 posted on 01/25/2012 7:18:26 PM PST by potlatch (*snip*~ Having the right to be angry does not give one the right to be cruel. ~*snip*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

Now if the judge holds up... He’s showed some courage so far.


68 posted on 01/25/2012 7:20:08 PM PST by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion

Because if he submits a fraudulant document to a court of law, the n—se will tighten around his neck quick...


69 posted on 01/25/2012 7:20:37 PM PST by phockthis (http://www.supremelaw.org/fedzone11/index.htm ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

AND, didn’t Pelosi certify him in the state of Georgia???


70 posted on 01/25/2012 7:23:03 PM PST by phockthis (http://www.supremelaw.org/fedzone11/index.htm ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: phockthis

Makes me wonder. Let’s say he wins the convention, then certification is sent to 50 states... what are the consequences of sending that certification to Georgia? Are there legal ramifications for the certifier?


71 posted on 01/25/2012 7:25:35 PM PST by Suz in AZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: iontheball

Jablonski will not be held in contempt; his client has apparently decided not to submit a substantive response to the petition, so a default judgment is in order.

Do not be surprised if Jablonski files a motion to continue in the morning. That will might buy Obama another week.


72 posted on 01/25/2012 7:26:15 PM PST by SeaHawkFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: SeaHawkFan

There will be a live feed in the mornings court proceedings. Here is the link to the live feed tomorrow morning in Malihi’s courtroom:

http://art2superpac.com/


73 posted on 01/25/2012 7:27:26 PM PST by Obama Exposer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Suz in AZ

Fraudulantly certifying a Federal Document...

Someone goes to Jail...


74 posted on 01/25/2012 7:31:57 PM PST by phockthis (http://www.supremelaw.org/fedzone11/index.htm ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: iontheball

Note his signupd date....


75 posted on 01/25/2012 7:32:28 PM PST by little jeremiah (We will have to go through hell to get out of hell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: SeaHawkFan

Up until now I have been very suspicious but not convinced that there was anything to this fake birth certificate deal but if he chooses to be left off of the primary ballot rather than make a few phone calls and produce the documents the judge is asking for then I will be convinced that there is no documentation and what he released on his web site and to the press was a fraud.


76 posted on 01/25/2012 7:33:15 PM PST by albionin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Obama Exposer

Thank you for that link.

PS I needed to post something so that I could change my tag line. ;o)


77 posted on 01/25/2012 7:38:23 PM PST by freepersup (Hi, I'm Michael Jablonski, and right about now my you know what is tighter than a tree's rings.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: albionin

Very good point.


78 posted on 01/25/2012 7:39:28 PM PST by georgia peach (georgia peach)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: RIghtwardHo

As I understand what happened in Florida in Nov.2000, the Democrats wanted to change the rules of an election partly through the voting process, and apply the change ONLY to two counties. The Republicans said no, and a court challente resulted.

This went all the way to SCOTUS which said it was a State of Florida problem, and kicked it back to Florida’s Supreme Court.

Is that correct? And if so, how would this be different?


79 posted on 01/25/2012 7:43:30 PM PST by SatinDoll (NO FOREIGN NATIONALS AS OUR PRESIDENT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Ron H.

“Should they receive an adverse ruling on the ballot issue at the state level they will just ask for and likely get a stay on any state court ruling pending a hearing in federal court. This is only the beginning and will (likely) drag out beyond the election while the order of stay is in effect and Obummer stays on the ballot.”

Suppose this does happen. Then suppose the election is very close and comes down to a few electors. Wouldn’t that mean that the election would hinge on that higher court ruling? Could we end up with another 2001 type scenario?


80 posted on 01/25/2012 7:44:18 PM PST by albionin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-157 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson