Posted on 01/06/2012 5:03:29 AM PST by Reaganite Republican
I knew there was something he reminded me of. LOL
| Poll | Date | Sample | Romney | Gingrich | Santorum | Paul | Perry | Huntsman | Spread |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RCP Average | 12/18 - 1/5 | -- | 27.7 | 22.3 | 15.7 | 10.0 | 5.0 | 2.3 | Romney +5.4 |
| Rasmussen Reports | 1/5 - 1/5 | 750 LV | 27 | 18 | 24 | 11 | 5 | 2 | Romney +3 |
| CNN/Time | 1/4 - 1/5 | 485 LV | 37 | 18 | 19 | 12 | 5 | 1 | Romney +18 |
“flakiest GOP primary electorate in history”
Why oh why is anyone that follows politics making a claim like this?
Name me one presidential election cycle in the last TWENTY YEARS (That is after the Reagan years for those in Rio Linda) that didn’t fit this description???????
We are always left with the option of voting while holding our noses.
Santorum has overtaken Gingrich in the only recent pair of South Carolina polls, released yesterday 1/5/12. See above.
The volatility is unprecedented, imho- and due to the party trying to shove Romney down our throats, GOPers are scrambling desperately for the ‘Not Romney’ candidate
imho we are starting to look silly, all lining up behind the weakest candidate, now vs a RINO and a full-on kook
I would have said a Newt/Bachmann ticket would be supreme... but she blew it by going negative on Newt unecessarily
What Newt needs is a couple more debates... not that he’s going negative on Romney, I CAN’T WAIT!
bump
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.