Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge rules against Alaska, says belugas endangered
Chicago Daily Law Bulletin ^ | November 25, 2011 | Dan Joling

Posted on 11/26/2011 6:11:09 AM PST by 1010RD

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last
Given that extinction is natural and reflective of the natural history of the earth - we're told that 98% of life is extinct - what's the purpose of the ESA?

What has happened to the environment as Belugas fell to 28% of their previous numbers?

What happened when the American Bison went extinct?

What is the net environmental effect of the following extinctions?:

Baiji River Dolphin

Tecopa Pupfish

Javan Tiger

Bubal Hartebeest

Pyrenean Ibex

Caribbean Monk Seal

Golden Toad

Passenger Pigeon

Quagga

Tasmanian Tiger

Source: http://listverse.com/2009/07/25/10-recently-extinct-animals/

1 posted on 11/26/2011 6:11:11 AM PST by 1010RD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Lambeth’s analysis is sound. He follows the law and the facts both of which support his decision.

The issue then is the law and the broader facts of extinction.

Here’s a longer list of known extinctions: http://roboconsumer.wordpress.com/2007/09/23/extinct-mammals/

Where’s the harm to the environment from extinctions? Or is it simply the missing-penny syndrome wherein the worlds elites must have that missing penny regardless of the cost?


2 posted on 11/26/2011 6:13:17 AM PST by 1010RD (First, Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1010RD

When the best available science predicts

Remember when we last relied on science? Global warming oh I meant climate change errr..... well you know what I mean.

Where do the scientists get thier funding??????? I rest my case!!!


3 posted on 11/26/2011 6:18:34 AM PST by ronnie raygun (V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 1010RD
Cook Inlet beluga whales did not bounce back after a decade, despite a ban on subsistence hunting...

Well, imagine that!

Humans still have a short distance to go before becoming God's.

4 posted on 11/26/2011 6:19:40 AM PST by EGPWS (Trust in God, question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1010RD
"Lambeth’s analysis is sound. He follows the law and the facts both of which support his decision."

I believe the judge is female.

5 posted on 11/26/2011 6:21:34 AM PST by OldEagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 1010RD

Put some in a tank and then freeze some DNA. We can clone them one day,

Problem solved.


6 posted on 11/26/2011 6:23:24 AM PST by netmilsmom (Happiness is a choice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OldEagle

I believe I was incorrect.


7 posted on 11/26/2011 6:24:16 AM PST by OldEagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: 1010RD
"The state said the listing would deter commercial fishing, oil and gas exploration and tourism and could affect operations at Alaska military installations. "
and this is the money quote...no drilling, no fishing, no tourists and the military is put in check... sounds like a communist's dream come true
8 posted on 11/26/2011 6:28:30 AM PST by joe fonebone (Project Gunwalker, this will make watergate look like the warm up band......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1010RD
You might enjoy this: George Carlin - Saving the Planet
9 posted on 11/26/2011 6:38:03 AM PST by PA Engineer (Time to beat the swords of government tyranny into the plowshares of freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1010RD

The Center for Biological Diversity is Goebbel’s Ministry of Propaganda with fur and fins. Everything these Nazis say is a lie.


10 posted on 11/26/2011 6:59:30 AM PST by sergeantdave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; ...

Thanks 1010RD. Here's the buried lead:
Cook Inlet beluga whales did not bounce back after a decade, despite a ban on subsistence hunting blamed for depleting their numbers, he said.
Subsistence hunting = non-European PreColumbian-style; the election was a few weeks ago. Hope? Change? 2012 is coming.


11 posted on 11/26/2011 7:16:04 AM PST by SunkenCiv (It's never a bad time to FReep this link -- https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 1010RD
What happened when the American Bison went extinct?

American Bison did not go extinct and are still eaten. Where does that idea come from?

Far more life forms are found on Earth every year than go extinct. The catalog of life is growing, as is the number of things we're apparently responsible for taking care of forever.

12 posted on 11/26/2011 7:16:52 AM PST by Reeses (Have you mocked a Democrat today?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1010RD
Lambeth’s analysis is sound. He follows the law and the facts both of which support his decision.

Show me the law.

The issue then is the law and the broader facts of extinction.

Beluga whales are not going extinct.

Here’s a longer list of known extinctions: http://roboconsumer.wordpress.com/2007/09/23/extinct-mammals/

And that's proof of what? Look at the list, it is minor species that were mostly adapted for small areas. Some of those areas could be protected, but natural changes an also make them inhabitable for those species. In most cases the problem was that we imported invasive species that took over the habitat or killed and ate the now-extinct species.

13 posted on 11/26/2011 7:17:00 AM PST by palmer (Before reading this post, please send me $2.50)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

The Cook Inlet population dwindled steadily through the 1980s and early 1990s, Lambeth wrote, and the decline was accelerated between 1994 and 1998 when Alaska Natives harvested nearly half the remaining 650 whales in only four years.

14 posted on 11/26/2011 7:18:16 AM PST by SunkenCiv (It's never a bad time to FReep this link -- https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: netmilsmom

Brilliant, but how long does frozen DNA preserve?


15 posted on 11/26/2011 7:24:28 AM PST by 1010RD (First, Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Reeses

Sorry for the exaggeration. What I meant was that they’ve been removed from their normal range and their wild numbers reduced to about 15000 from estimates in the millions. This reduction has lead to no deleterious effects in the natural environment.

I do know that they are still around and commercially raised. I’ve enjoyed ‘buffalo’ burgers.


16 posted on 11/26/2011 7:32:23 AM PST by 1010RD (First, Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: 1010RD
Lamberth, Royce C.
Born 1943 in San Antonio, TX

Federal Judicial Service:
Judge, U. S. District Court for the District of Columbia
Nominated by Ronald Reagan on March 19, 1987, to a seat vacated by Barrington D. Parker, Sr.; Confirmed by the Senate on November 13, 1987, and received commission on November 16, 1987. Served as chief judge, 2008-present.

Education:
University of Texas, B.A., 1965
University of Texas School of Law, LL.B., 1967

Professional Career:
U.S. Army Captain, JAG Corps, 1967-1974
U.S. Attorney's Office, District of Columbia, 1974-1987
Assistant U.S. attorney, Civil Division, 1974-1977
Assistant chief, Civil Division, 1977-1978
Chief, Civil Division, 1978-1987

17 posted on 11/26/2011 7:36:24 AM PST by SmithL (Proud Tennessee Volunteer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: palmer

http://www.fws.gov/laws/lawsdigest/ESACT.HTML

“Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act requires Federal agencies to insure that any action authorized, funded or carried out by them is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of listed species or modify their critical habitat.”

Modifying their critical habitat is the wedge as you are correct and Belugas are not going extinct.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beluga_whale


18 posted on 11/26/2011 7:36:55 AM PST by 1010RD (First, Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: 1010RD

A species can only be pushed so far before it reaches the point of no return. Just ask Canadian cod fishermen about that. Even after a total ban (too late) on cod fishing, the cod have not returned and never will return. Hey, but who cares if we kill everything in God’s creation as long as we can get some paper with ink splashed on it in return, right?


19 posted on 11/26/2011 7:54:34 AM PST by chessplayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joe fonebone

Well that’s right.

Alsaka didn’t lose, we all did.

The Fishermen the oil industry, jobs went down the tubes, it reminds me of whe they ruined the San Jouquin by turning off their water.


20 posted on 11/26/2011 7:58:10 AM PST by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson