Skip to comments.
Climategate 2.0 emails – They’re real and they’re spectacular!
Watts Up With That? ^
| November 22, 2011
| News Staff
Posted on 11/22/2011 12:08:17 PM PST by ConjunctionJunction
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-39 next last
More at the link.
To: ConjunctionJunction
2
posted on
11/22/2011 12:13:34 PM PST
by
RushIsMyTeddyBear
(A MUST WATCH: http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=KeOLurcQaqI)
To: ConjunctionJunction
3
posted on
11/22/2011 12:16:23 PM PST
by
goodnesswins
(My Kid/Grandkids are NOT your ATM, liberals! (Sarah Palin))
To: ConjunctionJunction
My first language (computer) was FORTRAN and I can garan-damn-tee you the the *first* whistleblower core-dump proved CRU was fudging the numbers.
Are we really surprised they were/are trying to recover from that embarrassment?
4
posted on
11/22/2011 12:20:47 PM PST
by
Peet
(Cogito ergo dubito.)
To: ConjunctionJunction; golux; proud_yank; Bockscar; grey_whiskers; WL-law; IrishCatholic; ...
5
posted on
11/22/2011 12:21:03 PM PST
by
steelyourfaith
(If it's "green" ... it's crap !!!)
To: goodnesswins
Yes, I saw the previous threads, but not from this source.
To: ConjunctionJunction
Theyre real and theyre spectacular!
ROFL. Kudos for the gratuitous Seinfeld, Terri Hatcher reference.
7
posted on
11/22/2011 12:25:59 PM PST
by
newheart
(When does policy become treason?)
To: steelyourfaith
Thanks for the link/ping!
To: ConjunctionJunction; newheart
To: ConjunctionJunction
Since when do real scientists refer to their research as a “cause”???
To: colorado tanker
True believers do - not real scientists. That’s for sure.
To: ConjunctionJunction
I posted your thread on the other one...
12
posted on
11/22/2011 12:50:08 PM PST
by
goodnesswins
(My Kid/Grandkids are NOT your ATM, liberals! (Sarah Palin))
To: ConjunctionJunction
2775> Jones: I too dont see why the schemes should be symmetrical. The temperature ones certainly will not as were choosing the periods to show warming
13
posted on
11/22/2011 12:52:39 PM PST
by
mvpel
(Michael Pelletier)
To: goodnesswins
To: ConjunctionJunction
![](http://www.chicagonow.com/blogs/ask-dr-jeff/assets_c/2009/12/Real%20and%20Spectacular-thumb-500x382-46436.jpg)
They're real and they're spectacular!
To: Lonesome in Massachussets
The’re only fake ‘till you touch ‘em!
16
posted on
11/22/2011 1:52:38 PM PST
by
enraged
To: colorado tanker
Since when do real scientists refer to their research as a cause??? When they find that their calling (and, more importantly, their funding) depends more on activism than on legitimate science. At that point, they're no longer "real scientists" and become "real activists" who are just pretending to be scientists.
17
posted on
11/22/2011 2:08:08 PM PST
by
Bob
To: ConjunctionJunction
Why not just post here? Unless you’re a blog pimp.
18
posted on
11/22/2011 2:11:44 PM PST
by
BunnySlippers
(I LOVE BULL MARKETS . . .)
To: BunnySlippers
Because it’s not my blog. The blog and its content belong to Anthony Watts. And because the post is kind of long.
To: colorado tanker
That's what I thought when I read the headline.
20
posted on
11/22/2011 3:02:09 PM PST
by
starlifter
(Pullum sapit)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-39 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson