Well, there was Bacon on the law,(1736) but he says the same thing that Vattel said. :)
He even puts the requirement of Loyal Parents BEFORE place of birth. While we're on the Subject, Aristotle also said
Posted on 11/19/2011 5:15:22 AM PST by Docs Galore
We shall see.
No, in fact I think they were complicit in the fraud perpetrated on the citizens, an it certainly was a fraud that could not have been unknown to the power brokers in both parties. Else there is no explanation for SR 151, and all the editing that went on in that resolution.
Do you really think that any person with very little actual facts as to who that person is or his accomplishments, could be elected to the presidency of the United States, and not one investigative arm of government could produce a history of the man? Laughable. We knew more about Joe the Plumber in 20 minutes than we know about the current president.
The indpendent voter’s mantra in 2012 will be:
Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me!!!
Bye bye Bari...
When I start worrying about your opinion of me, then I’ll know I’ve got a problem.
An article from the Washington Republic posted in the NY Times:
An excerpt..: Chief Justice Waite comes naturally to the Bar
by descent. His ancestors settled in Lyme Conn.
Dec 28, 1880
http://query.nytimes.com/mem/archive-free/pdf?res=F10C1EF9395B1B7A93CAAB1789D95F448884F9
Well, there was Bacon on the law,(1736) but he says the same thing that Vattel said. :)
He even puts the requirement of Loyal Parents BEFORE place of birth. While we're on the Subject, Aristotle also said
Never mind what Aristotle said. It’s too much trouble to hunt it up right now.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.