Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NASA Advances Evaluation of Piantelli’s LENR Research
New Energy Times ^ | Sept 28 2011 | Steven Krivit

Posted on 09/28/2011 7:18:22 PM PDT by Kevmo

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last
To: dila813

Rossi claimed his secret sauce was lost in the fire,,,,,,,,,
***Look at the title of this article, it’s about Piantelli, not Rossi. If Rossi’s secret sauce is lost in a fire... again... then Piantelli is sure to take his place in the front of the line.


41 posted on 09/30/2011 9:14:14 PM PDT by Kevmo (Caveat lurkor pro se ipso judicatis: Let the lurker decide for himself)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Kevmo

the only way to bet money right now is to give money to Rossi, there isn’t anyway to play the other side.

I think it is time to call the Florida Attorney General so the investigation can begin.


42 posted on 09/30/2011 10:29:56 PM PDT by dila813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Kevmo

It doesn’t matter if he tested it last year or next, if the customer isn’t verifiable, it is meaningless.

for example:
Hey guys, give me 5M, I have a star drive and it has already been tested by 15 alien races.

M - E - A - N - I - N - G - L - E - S - S


43 posted on 09/30/2011 10:32:42 PM PDT by dila813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Kevmo

Rossi is who we are talking about and who has committed to deliver the device. Piantelli isn’t on the hook for all the commitments, he is a baffoon relying on the con artist Rossi.

I fully expect this guy to break down and cry when this is finally exposed.

He will ask how a bunch of smart guys could be completely duped.


44 posted on 09/30/2011 10:43:53 PM PDT by dila813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: dila813

the only way to bet money right now is to give money to Rossi, there isn’t anyway to play the other side.

***Geez, don’t you even read your own posts? You can bet against Rossi and I can bet for him, as we’ve been discussing.


45 posted on 10/01/2011 1:21:04 AM PDT by Kevmo (Caveat lurkor pro se ipso judicatis: Let the lurker decide for himself)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: dila813

Uh, your argument is so exaggerated that it is meaningless. If the customer is not verifiable but pays Rossi $Millions, he’s going to be making ECats for a long time and selling even more. Eventually some non-alien customer’s name will leak out. Where do you come up with this stuff?


46 posted on 10/01/2011 1:23:56 AM PDT by Kevmo (Caveat lurkor pro se ipso judicatis: Let the lurker decide for himself)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: dila813

Don’t forget after Piantelli, there’s Brian Ahern, maybe even other scientists lining up to continue the supposed con. So when Rossi’s factory burns down, then Piantelli’s is going to have to burn, and so is Ahern’s... all this just to keep the ECat still in the bag.


47 posted on 10/01/2011 1:27:31 AM PDT by Kevmo (Caveat lurkor pro se ipso judicatis: Let the lurker decide for himself)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: dila813
"Did you read your post I replied to? You said it wasn’t October, now you are arguing with yourself."

I read it. I'm beginning to wonder if you did (or understood what you read).

"This ends at the end of this month, clearly Kevmo indicated he would be proven right and all the doubters wrong in October.

And the end of that time frame is 31 October...not 30 September. This date has been set for many months now.

"That is clearly not happening.....as I knew it wouldn’t.

Sorry, but it looks like it "is" happening to me. A major single-unit test to be done on October 6, and the 1MW plant test scheduled for later in October.

48 posted on 10/01/2011 4:50:58 AM PDT by Wonder Warthog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: dila813
"Rossi claimed his secret sauce was lost in the fire,,,,,,,,,if you want to say that he couldn’t be convicted, that is one thing, saying that there isn’t any evidence of fraud makes you a liar."

So trot out that evidence, buddy. You keep asserting that it's there. Put up of shut up. I can only think that from your obtuseness, you have NOT read the actual detailed report from the overseeing agency on the thermocouple research. WHERE are you getting this crap?? Pulling it out of your butt??

49 posted on 10/01/2011 4:51:03 AM PDT by Wonder Warthog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Wonder Warthog

google it

it is on the internet, stories were written in the local press even about the stories, not from blogs like the new energy times.

I previously linked to them, not going to go dig them out again.

I also linked to his email, phone numbers, his business application, his home address, photos of his apartment building, pictures of his factory (empty field with weeds), pictures of his corporate address (another empty field with trees in it), and much more

I am into the business side of this for determining whether this is a scam or not. I don’t have to know the science. I know business and I know cons, this is what I am good at. Sniffing out fraud.

The number 1 reason this is fraud though, is the person’s history. If he has pulled this crap before more than once, you are almost certainly going to get a repeat performance.


50 posted on 10/01/2011 10:27:22 PM PDT by dila813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Wonder Warthog

Rossi has already moved the goal posts in saying that he won’t disclose who the customer is.


51 posted on 10/01/2011 10:32:15 PM PDT by dila813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Kevmo

Piantelli’s only has a much more conservative energy output.

Only Rossi claims to get a 100x output over the other people researching LENR.

I have never said LENR doesn’t deserve research...I am telling you that I smell a rat in Rossi.

Look at the differences in the energy output, look at the differences in how long Rossi claims to maintain a stable reaction vs others. There are vast differences in the claims.

The other people researching LENR basically have a scientific curiosity that isn’t anywhere near commercial viability.

Rossi is claiming to ship a fully commercialized solution in October to a paying customer. Why can’t you guys realize how absurd that is?


52 posted on 10/01/2011 10:36:08 PM PDT by dila813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Kevmo

as I have told you, your contracts on intrade aren’t accepted and your ideas that they will currently are just a wild fantasy.

the contract form may not even be realistic to our discussion nor verifiable with any certainty because Rossi won’t even release people’s names now.

Totally useless fantastical information.


53 posted on 10/01/2011 10:38:17 PM PDT by dila813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: dila813

Earlier you said, “I am into the business side of this for determining whether this is a scam or not. I don’t have to know the science.” Bowl Sheet.

Here you try to delve into the science to justify your position. Your science is way off. That would suggest your ability to judge character is way off as well.


54 posted on 10/02/2011 1:33:30 AM PDT by Kevmo (Caveat lurkor pro se ipso judicatis: Let the lurker decide for himself)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: dila813

Demonstrate this false claim:
Only Rossi claims to get a 100x output over the other people researching LENR.


55 posted on 10/02/2011 1:34:47 AM PDT by Kevmo (Caveat lurkor pro se ipso judicatis: Let the lurker decide for himself)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: dila813

look at the differences in how long Rossi claims to maintain a stable reaction vs others.
***The thing to say here is: Duhh. That is the whole basis of how and why Rossi has gotten further in LENR than anyone else, due to his “catalyst” approach. Your position is incredibly inane.


56 posted on 10/02/2011 1:39:01 AM PDT by Kevmo (Caveat lurkor pro se ipso judicatis: Let the lurker decide for himself)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: dila813

The other people researching LENR basically have a scientific curiosity that isn’t anywhere near commercial viability.
***Again, duhh.

Basically you’re just saying the same thing. Repetition — the writing approach that makes you feel better but proves nothing.


57 posted on 10/02/2011 1:40:52 AM PDT by Kevmo (Caveat lurkor pro se ipso judicatis: Let the lurker decide for himself)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: dila813; B4Ranch

Rossi is claiming to ship a fully commercialized solution in October to a paying customer. Why can’t you guys realize how absurd that is?

***Of course it’s absurd at first glance. About as absurd as 2 bicycle mechanics claiming to unlock the secrets of flight 4 months after the highest aeronautical luminary of the day ignominiously crashed into the Potomac. Were they wrong? How would you have known at the time that they were right? By using inductive reasoning, which you seriously, astonishingly cannot do. All of this fumbling around with the science end of it shows that you lead with your emotions — “He’s a FRAUD! SQUAWK!!” , rather than look at the best available evidence.

And also, look at how little credit you give to other scientists who have investigated Rossi’s claims. Swedish Skeptics; professors of physics; Nobel Prize Winner, etc. Dude, they know far more than you do about the science. The guys who know about the business side of things have investigated the claims, and clunked down cash. Even one of our own freepers, B4Ranch, tried to get involved 10 Years Ago, but was turned down. Those are not the actions of a con artist, which you would know if you had an inductive reasoning capability.


58 posted on 10/02/2011 1:50:14 AM PDT by Kevmo (Caveat lurkor pro se ipso judicatis: Let the lurker decide for himself)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: dila813

as I have told you, your contracts on intrade aren’t accepted and your ideas that they will currently are just a wild fantasy.

***Fantasy, huh? Is that why Intrade has listed 2 of my suggested cold fusion contracts already? So the possibility of getting a third one listed is a fantasy?

Almost none of what you say on this board pans out when subjected to scrutiny. Why should any of us listen to you?

How I Made Money from Cold Fusion
Saturday, January 23, 2010 12:28:49 PM · by Kevmo · 28 replies · 1,013+ views
Exclusive Article for Free Republic | 1/23/10 | Kevmo
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2435697/posts


59 posted on 10/02/2011 1:53:24 AM PDT by Kevmo (Caveat lurkor pro se ipso judicatis: Let the lurker decide for himself)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: dila813
In other words, "you got nuttin'".

I've actually checked into at least SOME of your supposed "proofs", and there are simple and reasonable explanations that don't involve fraud, even in Italy. Remember, I actually READ the DOD report (among many other things).

Here's how it works...."you" have some allegations of fraud (NOT proof), and some odd activities in the business world. "I" have that same information, plus all of the scientific evidence of the various demonstrations and tests, plus the testimony of many reliable witnesses that the E-cat is NOT a fraud.

60 posted on 10/02/2011 3:47:06 AM PDT by Wonder Warthog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson