I've got a couple of Dr. CON's comments. One of him admitting he got Zotted, and the other he "forgets" that he ever trolled here at FR.
And
Zotted:
Posted on 09/28/2011 6:27:01 PM PDT by Seizethecarp
How about this? Has anyone ever gone looking for Obama's (white) grandparents in the Venona releases? There were hundreds and hundreds of people fingered in those KGB cables, including, Ann Coulter tells us in Treason, all of Joe McCarthy's infamous list of names, and more.
So has anybody looked? On lifestyle and c.v. grounds -- namely, noticing a) where they lived (always near key military installations) and b) how they had their daughter educated -- they smell good for a husband/wife team of KGB illegals.
Has anyone checked? Venona was released years before Obozo was in a position to have the files scrubbed (but of course, the Klintonx were there in the White Sink).
Well, I'm not a Birther or an "afterbirther" (first notice of that usage -- erk!), but *I* am impressed! Hat tip, Danae, and to your vanguard patriot friend El Sordo as well! Bravo Zulu!
No. That’s a dude.
So you checked the junk to personally verify this fact?
I’ll be honest, I think that video that is supposedly of Stanley Ann is silly. It looks nothing like her and in fact I don’t even think it’s a female. Looks like a boy to me and he doesn’t seem upset at all, looks like he couldn’t care less X was taken out.
I agree. What I don't understand is why Mario Apuzzo would post this on his website. This is too fringy without better proof than has been presented.
http://puzo1.blogspot.com/
I got a personal freepmail from Dr Conspiracy
Who the hell is this a$$hole?
Is he known here?
I have often commented that I have written imaging software and would be qualified enough to be an expert witness in a courtroom- and that I KNOW obama’s latest ‘abstract’ is a fraud.
he said he is ALSO a computer software engineer and that he can confirm that I dont know what I am talking about- i would like to kick his ass if I can find him
Hes a liar, and a fraud. A communist there can be no doubt. A member of the Communist website known as fogbow. He runs a far left radical web site known to spew lies for the spurious born illegitimate bastard obama.
He was banned for spreading lies on FR.
I've got a couple of Dr. CON's comments. One of him admitting he got Zotted, and the other he "forgets" that he ever trolled here at FR.
And
Zotted:
Article, then check ... What? - Waitaminute... see # 87 , 88 , 89 , 90.
.
No relation to Tex-Con-man is he?
Don’t forget the most recent zot for Dr Conspiracy, ‘BladeBryan’ I am sure there are other user names.
http://www.ip-adress.com/whois/obamaconspiracy.org
Here you go: WHO IS.
Can’t connect to the website this am.
site is back up:
http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2011/09/more-dunham-passport-documents/
they’re talking about us in the comments, Dr Conspiracy - who got the Zot - knows something is suspicious, (did we done him wrong?) and it looks like Sven has another handle. All very interesting, if you have the time.
site is back up
They’re talking about us in the comments, Dr Conspiracy - who got the Zot - knows something is suspicious, (did we done him wrong?) and it looks like Sven has another handle.
All very interesting, if you have the time.
. . . . Check out Link at # 94.
Thanks Fred Nerks.
Ping to further Dr. Conspiracy dissing of Obama’s BC defense in GA:
http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2012/01/burden-of-proof-in-georgia/
“So far Obama’s attorney hasn’t shown that he intends to mount much of a defense. He didn’t list any exhibits in his pre-trial order and only one witness, one that can’t speak to the facts of Obama’s birth. So what is zero plus zero? It looks like such an answer would be a lose for Obama because in a previous decision in O’BRIEN v. GROSS, Judge
Malihi wrote:
‘Under Haynes v. Wells, 273 Ga. 106, 538 S.E.2d 430 (2000), the burden of proof is entirely upon Respondent to establish affirmatively his eligibility for office.’
“My advice to Mr. Jablonski is to bring a birth certificate with him and maybe some documents to show Obama’s residence for the past 14 years. That way Obama looks just everybody else who sometimes has to show documentation.”
Per Orly’s website...
January 17, 2012
7:15 AM PST
Orly,
I Just spoke with the staff attorney, Kim Beals (?) in Judge Malihi’s court. (pronounced Mali) She said that she was going to talk with the judge about the subpoena but when I asked her if the judge was going to consider evidence and witnesses on January 26th she said “Oh yes, there’s going to be a hearing. There are three separate cases and yes whatever she (Taitz) wants to bring forward will be her decision. She is presenting her case. He will be considering evidence.” or something to that affect. She is talking to the judge now about the subpoena process and is going to call me back.
She just called me back. She said that I could honor the subpoena or make a motion to quash it which basically I would send her a request. I said that no, I wanted to honor it, I just wanted to make sure that the Judge had given Orly Taitz the authority to subpoena evidence and witnesses. And that she would be allowed to present her evidence and witnesses in the court room and the staff attorney said absolutely, maybe not all of it because of objections and what not. I asked that, concerning the subpoenas, did Orly Taitz do anything inappropriate by sending them out and she responded “No, Attorney Taitz has a case pending before Judge Malihi and she can send subpoenas–it’s a form on their website.”
Please feel free to share this on your website and use my name. You have been maligned in this instance. See you in Georgia.
Linda Jordan
Below in context when Dr. Conspiracy says “It is quite possible that there are strong tactical reasons not to create a situation where there is a litigated set of facts subject to court appeals”...the subtext seems to be that he suspects that Obama doesn’t actually have a certified BC:
http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2012/01/burden-of-proof-in-georgia/
Dr. ConspiracyJanuary 16, 2012 at 6:00 pm (Quote)#
“I’ve been watching birthers for over 3 years now and I find that there are two groups: those that can be satisfied and those who cannot. In the former group there are those who are hung up on one thing. The biggest “thing” was the long-form birth certificate “if he has nothing to hide then …” The number of birthers dropped precipitously after the long form release. Well, there are, I speculate, another group that could be satisfied if an official document was ever submitted in court.
“And as I said in the article, Judge Malihi has once rejected Respondent arguments that the challenge is invalid. The Judge has placed the burden of proof on the Respondent before. It would seem very risky not to present some proof.
“Further I think it would be better to establish a precedent NOW than later.
“Expelliarmus: Jablonski is extremely well qualified and knows what he is doing.It is quite possible that there are strong tactical reasons not to create a situation where there is a litigated set of facts subject to court appeals.”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.