Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama Pines for the Days of Pre-blog Monolithic Mainstream Media
Newsbusters ^ | August 17, 2011 | Ken Shepherd

Posted on 08/17/2011 1:40:48 PM PDT by markomalley

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last
To: Jmouse007
And America pines for the day when you will be removed from the White House.

Can I get an "Amen", brothers and sisters???

"Amen!!!!"

21 posted on 08/17/2011 3:29:35 PM PDT by andy58-in-nh (America does not need to be organized: it needs to be liberated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Help me out here. What’s the difference between “giving Michelle her way 90% of the time”, and Rep. Bachmann “submitting to her Husband’s wisdom”?

Anybody?


22 posted on 08/17/2011 4:42:17 PM PDT by papasmurf (War is hell, but not the worst hell. Having a PRES__ENT comes close!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Pesky Internet. Al Gore’s fault.


23 posted on 08/17/2011 9:27:24 PM PDT by 5thGenTexan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: papasmurf
22 posted on Wednesday, August 17, 2011 6:42:17 PM by papasmurf: “Help me out here. What’s the difference between “giving Michelle her way 90% of the time”, and Rep. Bachmann “submitting to her Husband’s wisdom”? Anybody?”

Rep. Michelle Bachmann is a conservative Lutheran who presumably believes the teachings of her church on male headship in the church and the home. She's being consistent with her core religious beliefs.

Conservative Christian women have been in politics for a very long time. Conservative Christians as well as non-Christians have gotten used to the idea that a woman can submit to her husband in the sphere of the home and male leadership in the sphere of the church without impairing her ability to govern in the sphere of the state.

I think just about the last politically significant effort to argue that women have no biblical right to govern in the state was when John Knox wrote a very badly timed book, originally aimed against the Roman Catholic queens of Scotland and France, which backfired when Queen Elizabeth I assumed the throne of England as a Protestant. The view that women have no biblical right to rule the state has pretty much been discredited in conservative Christian circles since the mid-1500s, and that's a good thing.

However, I'm not sure what it means to have the President of the United States deferring 90 percent of the time to the wishes of his wife. We didn't elect her, any more than we elected Nancy Reagan or Laura Bush.

24 posted on 08/19/2011 8:15:41 AM PDT by darrellmaurina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: darrellmaurina

Typo alert: I wrote “Roman Catholic queens of Scotland and France” but meant “Scotland and England,” i.e., Mary Queen of Scots, and Queen Mary of England. While Mary Queen of Scots was married to the King of France, she was the queen consort, not the queen regnant, and did not rule in France. Queen Mary of England was, of course, an entirely different person who shared only the same name and the same religion.


25 posted on 08/19/2011 8:30:49 AM PDT by darrellmaurina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson