Outrage Grows over Magazine’s Exploitation of 10 Year-Old Girl

Women of Grace ^ | August 5, 2011 | Susan Brinkmann

[SMARTY]

That looks creepy

[NYer]

Exploitation of children ... we have our own home-grown version here in the US, watched by millions of viewers on TLC. It's called "Toddlers and Tiaras".

Who needs the public education system to rob our children of their innocence when their parents have already done it.

[ken21]

democrat state controlled child abuse.

[RushIsMyTeddyBear]

Check out the very bottom of this fan page the writer has linked to. What the heck? “In God We Trust”??????

[isthisnickcool]

Icky! And disturbing. I was channel surfing the other night and ran across something called Toddlers and Tiaras. check this garbage out.

Creepy....

[Pecos]

And there is a dance school version of the same thing. Oh, lucky us. Pole-dancing 6 yer olds. /s/

[Pecos]

And there is a dance school version of the same thing. Oh, lucky us. Pole-dancing 6 yr olds. /s/

[NYer]

See my post #3.

[yefragetuwrabrumuy]

The owner of the Vogue magazines is Condé Nast publications, located in New York City. Therefore, if any copies of the French version of Vogue are sold in New York State or the rest of the US, the attorney general of the State of New York, or their federal attorney, could likely prosecute the owners of the parent company.

Importantly, the way the statutes are written does not require nudity, but includes “children in sexually suggestive poses”.

[wagglebee]

Moral Absolutes Ping!

Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the moral absolutes ping list.

FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
[ Add keyword moral absolutes to flag FR articles to this ping list ]

[null and void]

Importantly, the way the statutes are written does not require nudity, but includes “children in sexually suggestive poses”.

Interesting. Who decides what is suggestive?

Sidebar: exploiting children in this manner would be the only way fashion designers could show their wares in muslim countries...

[freejohn]

That first picture .. Is that a doll?

That baby (bottom pic) has on platforms?

Good Lord!

[Steelfish]

Conde Nast is a left-wing liberal publication. Why a global boycott of this magazine has not been called for is indicate of the current state of world morality or its lack thereof.

[GeronL]

This is normal in places like japan (pervertland)

[redgolum]

There will be push in the next few years to lower the age of consent. There have been a few trial cases, but not one that stuck yet.

Same with polygamy.

[Tax-chick]

*snicker*

[Pigsley]

That program Toddlers and Tiaras IS DISTURBING. For so many reasons. Mainly why parents, MOTHERS, want to display their little girls as heavily made up women. Beyond bizarre...I admit I've seen it a few times, because I keep thinking I'll hear a decent reason one of these hags is doing this to her innocent little girl. Nothing yet.

What I find funny, in a dark way, is that the mothers are all usually obese or ugly or very plain or a combo of these....I understand that some people try to “live” through their kids...but this is so transparent on this program. And the little girls? A few would be considered very pretty, I guess, but 90% of them are very average and look a great deal like their unattractive/plain/obese mommy.

This is yet another crummy thing the mother is doing: Setting the girl up to think she is a “beauty queen” by winning these paid for trophies (everybody wins something)...then when the reality of puberty hits and the girl realizes she is not a “beauty queen”...Well, not a good thing for a young girl. Child actors go through a very rough time at puberty....99% are thrown out like trash by their agents. I worked in the industry...and it was VERY disturbing. The kids are treated like royalty, their parents make $$$ off them, then all of a sudden nobody wants them anymore and the parents have spent all the $$$.

Sometimes, I think people should have to take a damn test before they have a baby.

[dfwgator]

That program Toddlers and Tiaras IS DISTURBING.

That show comes from the deepest pits of Hell.

[Pigsley]

I'll answer the question about the first pic. I unfortunately know, because I watched a couple of these stupid programs. Never again....anyway: The parents have these photo-shopped pics of their kids taken...part of the pageant. Another reason to give out a phony trophy or crown. Everybody must win something or the dopey mothers would feel their $3,000 “investment” isn't worth it.

Sad when a mother uses a little kid this way.