Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Perry doing better with Texas Republicans
Public Policy Polling ^ | July 6, 2012

Posted on 07/06/2011 12:26:38 PM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last
To: BereanBrain
I'm gonna disagree. The reason we are where we are is because Bush was a Compashionate Conservative who wouldn't go after Fannie Mae and Freddy Mac because he didn't want to rumble over it and probably believed in the concept.

We have been fighting two wars for 10 years.

The current President is NOT a career politician, he's an ideologue with Communism in his hear and wants to bankrupt us.

We had tax cuts while implementing programs like the Prescription Drug Benefit and while fighting these wars but we NEVER CUT SPENDING on entitlements.

Clinton had a balanced budget back in the late nineties because the House forced things like welfare reform and spending cuts down his throat and Billy was a good enough politician to go along and fight another day.

Perry is not a Compassionate Conservative, never was, that's Bush 43 and "kinder gentler nation" 41.

I think its is an election based on record and Perry will destroy Obama (remember he's actually been fighting him for 2 1/2 years now).

Plus I hear Dewhurst is gonna run for Kay Baileys seat and that means we will get fresh blood that Texas needs.

21 posted on 07/06/2011 3:03:58 PM PDT by normy (Don't take it personally, just take it seriously.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: BereanBrain

Thank you and yours too. We are all on the same team.


22 posted on 07/06/2011 3:04:55 PM PDT by normy (Don't take it personally, just take it seriously.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: normy

Yeah, but if our team is to be better (more than just different faces) from the other, we must have scruples.

Didn’t our parents teach us that winning at any cost is not right?

Sometimes, loosing is winning. (temporarily). I have lost sales deals that 6 months later I get a call back and the business because the customer was lied to. I think right now, the American public is waking up and realizes that the status quo of D vs R will just get us more in debt.

The definition of crazy is doing the same thing we have always done, and expecting a different result.

I advocate - throw the professional politicians OUT. The least experience in politics the better. We have applointed positions to advise the president in all matters of foreign policy, military, budget, etc. The president is in reality a CEO of the US. Nobody expects a CEO of for example, BOEING to be an aerospace engineer. CEOs don’t fly planes. President’s don’t negotiate treaties, or make budgets, they LEAD. Any politicians have been leading us like the Pied Piper to our doom.

Time we stopped drinking the SLICK POLITICIAN Kool-AID. No matter if it’s Cherry (Red) or Blue (Grape).


23 posted on 07/06/2011 3:29:19 PM PDT by BereanBrain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: BereanBrain

Now that I think about it. I like Rick Santelli for Pres.

Let’s DRAFT RICK SANTELLI!!!!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bEZB4taSEoA

http://wallstreetpit.com/33123-rick-santellis-keynesian-economics-rant

I can’t think of a better candidate.....Put some political type as the VP.


24 posted on 07/06/2011 3:33:16 PM PDT by BereanBrain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: normy

I’m sure Perry’s ego and the beltway hacks will convince him otherwise, but Perry is not viable in the national primaries. If he jumps in, he will win the entire south plus OK, KS, and maybe AZ, NM, and AK if Palin stays out. Problem is, he’s DOA everywhere else.

Perry would need to carry the entire Midwest to beat Romney, and he would not do that even if both T-Paw and Bachmann were to drop out of the race and endorse him. Both Palin and Bachmann could drop out and Romney would still beat Perry by 2-1 in delegates.

Either Bachmann or Palin could win in a 3-way race. Cain won’t last past South Carolina. Perry would not be viable even in a heads-up contest vs Romney. He is a regional candidate and his presence in the race directly benefits Romney, and only Romney.

Bachmann’s a stalking horse? You may want to reconsider that. Between Palin/Perry/Cain/Bachmann, Bachmann’s been the only one pulling significant support away from Mitt. She’s stealing from his fundraising candy jar well. Until and unless Palin declares, she’s the only one making Mitt break a sweat.

There is a lot of buzz about Perry because the RNC sees him as a way to put Romney on the top of the ticket, and the MSM would love to turn 2012 into another referendum on G.W. Bush.

If Perry is not a stalking horse for Mitt, please tell us why on earth NPR and Salon.com would be singing his praises at this particular time?


25 posted on 07/06/2011 3:43:17 PM PDT by CowboyJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson