Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The founder's minds on Citizenship.
http://memory.loc.gov ^ | 7/5/2011 | DiogenesLamp

Posted on 07/05/2011 3:53:32 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-23 last
To: DiogenesLamp
Thanks for sharing this. It makes it much clearer that an NBC is born of two US citizens.

Like a natural pair when playing cards, you just can't have a wild card and still be a natural. You would still have a pair, but not a natural pair. You can be born a citizen and still not be a Natural-born-citizen. You would have the wild-card of a second citizenship, and disqualifies for the presidency.

From birth to age of 21, Obama was a legal Kenyan Citizen.
This statement is fact, not opinion.

21 posted on 07/06/2011 9:35:20 AM PDT by PA-RIVER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PA-RIVER
"Like a natural pair when playing cards, you just can't have a wild card and still be a natural. You would still have a pair, but not a natural pair. You can be born a citizen and still not be a Natural-born-citizen. "

That's an excellent analogy! Bravo! Don't be surprised if you see that being repeated elsewhere ;)

"From birth to age of 21, Obama was a legal Kenyan Citizen."

Additionally...Barry was also a British citizen at birth until at least age of 2 (when Kenya became independent) and possibly even Indonesian if he was adopted by Lolo Soetoro.

Not only was/is Barry a dual citizen...the guy is a multi-national having up to 4 different citizenship's/nationalities.

It's impossible the framers would have considered a multi-national to be a "natural born Citizen."

22 posted on 07/06/2011 11:23:32 AM PDT by rxsid (HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN? - Leo Donofrio (2009))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: so_real
I am looking at the bigger picture. What is being discussed is what makes a "citizen", and what laws define a "citizen", and how this discussion of "citizenship" provides insight into the "original intent" regarding the concept. My point is that if discussion and legislation had to take place just so these individuals could even be considered "citizens", there is no way they could in any conceivable way, have been considered "natural born citizens" prior to the discussion and legislation.

Absolutely! If the founders wouldn't even allow citizenship for the children of a foreigner, why would they regard the child of a foreigner to be a "Natural born citizen" just because they were born on the soil?

It makes no sense to believe that they would.

23 posted on 07/07/2011 12:56:30 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp (Obama hides behind the Grass Skirts of Hawaiian Bureaucrats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-23 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson