Posted on 05/29/2011 7:17:16 AM PDT by RogerFGay
Part and parcel of the Liberal mindset, in this and all other cases - any evidence that comes along and refutes a pet theory, just ignore it and make believe it doesn’t exist.
AGW ping?
The Left's insidious propaganda machine relies on more than just the propagation of false information. They reinforce their repititious message with outrageous fear tactics and emotional appeals (If you don't believe what we're telling you, you'll destroy the planet and you're an enemy of mankind and all that is good).
Excellent article. Thanks for posting.
Nice explanation of why the Global Warming types get so angry when we ask questions and want to examine their data, models and assumptions.
Right. It is conducted by overweight filmakers and former politicians, and executed by czars.
I’d like to know how many of the “scientists” in favor of AGW actually did any study whatsoever on the subject. Doubtless, many did some superficial reading of the conclusions made by the warmists and agreed on political grounds.
Here in my little Northern California hamlet, we should've had steady temperatures above 90 during the day with lows in the 60s at night.
Instead we've had nothing but highs in the upper 60s to mid 70s (with an occassional 80 and I think one 90 so far) and lows in the upper 40s and rain out the wazoo.
Don't get me wrong. I'm loving it! I work outside for the most part and usually by this time of year I'm already kicking myself for lying about finding another job by this time of year.
If this is Global Warming, I'm all for it.
Thanks RogerFGay.
 |
||
| · join · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post new topic · subscribe · | ||
ala Baghdad Bob.
Global Warming Fraud and the Future of Science - J. R. Dunn
The "scientists" who perpetrated the global warming fraud approached their science in exactly the opposite manner as the approach described above. They formulated a theory based on political ideology (as well as the path of least resistance to "grant" money) and then did whatever they had to do with their data to "prove" it.
What the world has now seen with the expose of the "global warming" scam puts a new spin on the old saying: "Figures can lie and liars can figure." The discipline of science has taken a massive hit over the past few months and it could take years for science - - and scientists - - to regain credibility with the public. A lot of that burden must fall on honest scientists, and the first and most important thing they must do is scream for the heads of Michael Mann, Phil Jones, and the rest of the fraudsters. I guess we'll see if they have the integrity to do it.
ping
Samuel Adams
What is "science" to the warmists? It is consensus.
Science is not conducted by committee and certainly not by political appointees in an intergovernmental panel.LOL!
Right. It is conducted by overweight filmakers and former politicians, and executed by czars.
I’d like to know how many of the “scientists” in favor of AGW actually did any study whatsoever on the subject. Doubtless, many did some superficial reading of the conclusions made by the warmists and agreed on political grounMany of the "peer-reviewed studies" start by stating they're investigating effects of global warming on something in their area of research. They quote from the funding offer, the characterization of the effect they're supposed to have. They then do their unrelated research and say "see there" - must have been what I saw happened because of global warming, just like it said in the funding solicitation - "send more money."
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
