Posted on 05/24/2011 7:22:04 PM PDT by techno
Prediction: Pawlenty will get the candidacy because GOP will not close the primaries.
Don’t blame them leaving Paul out, his spam monkeys can ruin a website. I know a magazine editor who doesn’t want any articles mentioning him because, as she put it, they don’t have the staff to deal with all the spam from his supporters. Lots of spam that doesn’t translate to votes.
I am glad they left Paul out. His supporters are by and large complete jackasses that live to skew polls, this is provable by how many delegates he won in 2008 after “winning” a bunch of skewed online polls.
why no Dr. Ron Paul? He is leading most polls. What is this? some kind of rigged deal. This sucks. Im a Cain man but lets do our polls right.
Prediction; Romney, Pawlenty and Huntsman split the RINO vote and Herman Cain or Michelle Bachmann win the nomination in a reverse bizarro replay of 2008 primaries. Too many RINO’s this time around. The only unknown is wether or not Palin gets in and IF she does, when. I gotta think that a lot of the big money donors are starting to get behind the folks that are already in.
Not that I have any problem with Sarah, so please, if anyone reading this is a worshipper, don’t get me wrong. Frankly if Cain nor Bachmann catch fire, she is my third choice.
I technically agree w you. Until Palin throws in. Then it’s over. The Tea Party isn’t stupid. We’ll let it be known Palin or nothing. IMHO. Quit thinking linear. :}
YEAH! Paul is a juggernaut in the election process. During the last elections he received .000003% of the vote. We desperately need his spam monkeys.
“I’ve got the declared candidates on the list, plus Bachmann and Palin. I don’t believe Palin is going to run, but I figured there’d be a meltdown if I took her off the list this early. Also, Ron Paul isn’t on there because every time I include him on a poll a bunch of joo-haters rush over from whatever conspiracy theorist website they’re currently trolling and skew the results.”
HA! Glad I am not the only one with a worse opinion of Paulistinians than I even have of the good doctor.
http://conservatives4palin.com/2011/05/palins-secret-weapon-new-film-to-premiere-in-june.html
Palin isn’t running. Are you sure?
Why was this film made?
ron paul in 2008
iowa - 10%
NH - 8%
nevada - 14%
maine - 18%
alaska - 17%
minnesota - 16%
montana - 25%
north dakota - 21%
kansas - 11%
washington - 22%
pennsylvania - 16%
nebraska - 13%
oregon - 15%
idaho - 24%
You are answering something that I “quoted” from the article at AoS. You know, the one you posted?
I do not know if Palin is going to run as I said but I think that if she tarrys she might miss out on some big money donors that may already be supporting candidates currently in the race.
“During the last elections he received .000003% of the vote. “
Actually he got as much as 24% in some state primaries.
http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/primaries/results/candidates/#302
I always vote for Ron Paul in internet polls. It’s an entertaining tradition. I don’t think I’m alone.
I agree, we’re appalled at no Ron Paul!
There is no Ron Paul because he is not a viable candidate.
And, as mnehring pointed out above, the Paulestinians spam polls like this en masse, rendering them meaningless.
I never let an opportunity go by to vote for the doctor Ron. He reminds me of my uncle.
The Paul haters are such sore losers that they have rigged their polls. What sad, pathetic creatures they are.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.