Posted on 05/16/2011 6:56:14 AM PDT by mnehring
ping
this guy is just a crackpot...always has been, always will be...
Peripheral libertarianism looks a lot like the Constitution, and has some appeal for me.
Core libertarianism, however, gets aggressively anti-Christian, pro-drug, and ultra-isolationist. That’s where it loses me.
The answer to your STUPID question is
HE WASNT IN LONDON
The thing about Ron Paul is that one minute he making perfect sense and then all of sudden he comes out with some real looney Tune idea. Like Dr. Paul and Mr. Hyde. LOL!!
I agree with the OBL kill but to play devil’s advocate:
We intentionally violated another nations sovereignty by not including Pakistan in the mission. How would the US react if another nation did the same to us?
Ron Paul actually has a position on abortion, where the official position on abortion for true libertarians, is NO POSITION on abortion, just like their twins, the anarchists.
Ron Paul's support may be winding down to just the neo-confederates...they still have lots in common with Ron Paul.
I think Libertarians are starting to worry that Paul has let the cat out of the bag.
I’ve been fascinated with the intensity, persistance and loyalty of those who zealously push him as a viable pres. candidate. Where does he find hese people?
Frankly, he and his followers always appear to be a cult to me. Not too different than Jones, Manson and Moon. I’m always uncomfortable with the people Paul attracts. They are relentless in their attempts to coopt FR and conservatism. If they are conservatives, in the Tea Party sense, then I’m Donald Duck.
Yeah, like 99.99999% of lawyers make all lawyers look bad!
If the mission was to kill Osama, why are we so intent on questioning his wives? Are they going to ask the wives about things they could have at the very least cross examined from Osama? Maybe 0'Zero knew that if by capturing Osama, Erik Holder would find a way to screw it up politically for 0'Zero?
I like some of Paul’s idea. Too bad he’s a complete nutjob.
You lie!!! If you can't refute Paul without lying about it, you obviously don't have a case.
I consider myself a small “l” libertarian. I agree with a strict adherance to the constitution, but a decent into anarchy just does not appeal to me...I took a test once to see where you fall on the wheel of politics...I fell right on the line between conservative and libertarian...I think that in order to be conservative you have to have some libertarian leanings, but, this guy and his big “L” libertarians are nutjobs....
Ron Paul refuses to pander. He says what he believes come hell or high water unlike the rest of the Republican field.
Descent into anarchy? Ron Paul is against anarchism. You are setting up a straw man....but heh don’t let stop you if it makes your world simplier to understand.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.