Skip to comments.
A safe bet on Obama’s future?
Canada Free Press ^
| 5/8/11
| Don Fredrick
Posted on 05/08/2011 4:23:51 PM PDT by westcoastwillieg
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
Trust but verify - we need forensic experts to examine Obama's long form birth certificate.
To: westcoastwillieg
Obama publicly humiliated a billionaire with a big ego and a short fuse.
I think Obama will want that moment back.
2
posted on
05/08/2011 4:29:10 PM PDT
by
cruise_missile
(Palin: More woman than Michelle. More man than Barack.)
To: westcoastwillieg
That is why Obama is fighting the eligibility lawsuits.And the fact that he signed his name (before the election) to SR 511 in agreement with the TWO US CITIZEN PARENTS definition. He can't do a little side-step dance out of that one.
Yes, for that I did use all caps.
3
posted on
05/08/2011 4:31:10 PM PDT
by
bgill
(Kenyan Parliament - how could a man born in Kenya who is not even a native American become the POTUS)
To: westcoastwillieg
we need forensic experts to examine Obama's long form birth certificate. Which one? Or was there ever one?
4
posted on
05/08/2011 4:31:55 PM PDT
by
bgill
(Kenyan Parliament - how could a man born in Kenya who is not even a native American become the POTUS)
To: westcoastwillieg
we need forensic experts to examine Obama's long form birth certificate. Which one? Or was there ever one?
5
posted on
05/08/2011 4:31:55 PM PDT
by
bgill
(Kenyan Parliament - how could a man born in Kenya who is not even a native American become the POTUS)
To: westcoastwillieg
Trust but verify - we need forensic experts to examine Obama's long form birth certificate. What birth certificate? Obama released a suspect Certificate of Live Birth, not Birth Certificate.
6
posted on
05/08/2011 4:37:53 PM PDT
by
JohnG45
To: westcoastwillieg
“The term [natural born citizen] is not defined in the Constitution and has never been applied in such a way that it would disqualify Obama. If you believe it does, then you should have taken it to court BEFORE the election. In the aftermath, it's just sour grapes.”
Natural Born Citizen is defined... in law and in expounded upon in the Federalist Papers. The intent of the Framers is clear and they made it even more clear in their writings. Not one single liberal has a reality based, historically correct education.
The US Constitution and its tenants are are basis of all individual rights and the limitations placed upon government. This clown is writing ignorance and propaganda.
LLS
7
posted on
05/08/2011 4:45:04 PM PDT
by
LibLieSlayer
(THANK YOU PRESIDENT BUSH!)
To: LibLieSlayer
That`s all I want, the USSC to decide if obama jr. is , as their own web site FightTheSmears says, if he is a Native Born or not.
ALL the legal evidence says obama jr. does not meet the Constitutional standard of Natural Born to be President.
To: JohnG45
Precisely! Onada’s most recently released document only proves that his father was “African”—not American. Hence, he is Constitutionally ineligible for the US presidency. The Marxist Usurper is depending on his propaganda organs and dumbed down Americans to go along with his charade.
It really is as simple as that. I’m truly amazed that any FR participant is fooled by the chicanery and/or buys into the argument that this Constitutionsal issue is not important. Onada’s own actions and policies make it clear the Kenyon has no allegiance to anything that is American. That is why The Framers put the “natursal born American” clause in The Constitution.
To: cruise_missile
IMHO Obama would have wanted this moment to come after Trump had wasted a lot of time, resources and credibility on his “investigation”. This is the sort of thing he should have pulled out October 2012. So why now? Was he trying to neutralize trump before he got any traction as a candidate. . . or before he got any information as an investigator.
10
posted on
05/08/2011 4:53:43 PM PDT
by
TheVitaminPress
(as goes the Second Amendment . . . so goes the Constitution.)
To: westcoastwillieg
To: westcoastwillieg
"The term [natural born citizen] is not defined in the Constitution and has never been applied in such a way that it would disqualify Obama. If you believe it does, then you should have taken it to court BEFORE the election.
It WAS taken to court November 16 2008, before the Electoral votes were counted, hence, before the election.
To: westcoastwillieg
Unless Reagan rises from the dead and runs, we can easily find at least one reason not to support any leading Conservative candidate.
But the good news is that we have our Christ like "integrity".
13
posted on
05/08/2011 4:56:41 PM PDT
by
NoLibZone
(Unless Reagan rises from the dead, we can easily find at least one reason to skip a leading GOPer.)
To: cruise_missile
If Obama had savoir faire, he would have been more subtle and Trump would have shrugged it off; instead; he chose a series of sophomoric one-liners that really pissed The Donald off.
Mark Twain’s famous quote ‘Never pick a fight with a person who buys ink by the barrel’ has to be modified for the 21st Century to ‘Never pick a fight with a person who can buy the ink and barrel factories.’
To: westcoastwillieg
This was probably THE best article on the subject of O’s ineligibility that I've read.
To: Para-Ord.45
I agree my man... but Clarence Thomas has telegraphed that Roberts will never hear this case because they refuse to overturn a Presidential election. I agree with you... he should be impeached for this and other things... but the reality is that we have got to vote this bastard out of office.
LLS
16
posted on
05/08/2011 5:09:33 PM PDT
by
LibLieSlayer
(THANK YOU PRESIDENT BUSH!)
To: westcoastwillieg
Great article. Thanks for posting it.
To: LibLieSlayer
Clarence Thomas is a smart man. He knows that the issue the Court needs to decide is not whether Obama should be removed from office (political question), but to simple and clearly define what the term "natural born citizen" means (legal question) in Article II. The Court's responsibility is to interpret the Constitution, not decide what should happen to Obama once the Court defines the term. Congress has that responsibility and Thomas knows it. To claim otherwise, is flatly disengenuous and a false canard.
To: LibLieSlayer
Clarence Thomas has telegraphed that Roberts will never hear this case
***I had not heard that. When did it happen? Is it official or under the table?
19
posted on
05/08/2011 5:28:31 PM PDT
by
Kevmo
(Turning the Party over to the so-called moderates wouldn't make any sense at all. ~Ronald Reagan)
To: westcoastwillieg
All they have to do is to get a Hawaii official to view the LFCOLB as presented on TV and pronounce it is certified or not!
If it doesn’t match the one they sent to him, America, we have a problem!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson