Posted on 03/22/2011 1:23:41 PM PDT by STARWISE
http://wtpotus.wordpress.com/2011/03/15/whose-identity-did-obama-steal/
This site has some information in the comments that debunks the Jean Paul Ludwig theory.
GO DONALD!
“If you’re unaware of the Sanity Squad, you must not have spent very much time on the eligibility threads. I didn’t suggest that seniority or military service should grant automatic trust.”
Sorry Charlie, but I still don’t buy it. I looked up your page and noted that you’ve actually squelched very little, if any, not unlike “curiosity”. I’ve been following the eligibility issue since it was raised on WorldNetDaily by Jos. Farah and Dr. Corsi and discussed extensively here. Moreover, I haven’t mentioned “seniority” or “automatic trust” as there is none here except for JimRob. Sometimes there is no sanity here either when the apologists weigh in. So, there you go again jimmy!
JC
Thank you.
WorldNetDaily? That’s all you had say.
WorldNetDaily? That’s all you had say.
“WorldNetDaily? That’s all you had say.”
No jimmy, there you go again. That’s not all I said, and why is it that you usually double-post your responses? That’s another nuisance. SHEEESH
JC
I don’t know who the hell Jimmy is. Talk to the boss about the double posting. That’s not my problem.
This is from memory and I do not have a link but someone may want to see if it helps shed any light on a small part of this SS# fraud. When I first looked into the information that BO has a history of using multiple SS#’s, I found an explanation for the “999” numbers. IIRC, they are temporary numbers - not “real” - that cannot be used for all the purposes of a real SS# and are typically issued to foreign students who need to have an SS# to use on various forms while in the U.S. going to school. Very limited usage for them. There was no further information that I found such as if they are issued with the second block of numbers related to when the number was issued or where it was issued like real SS numbers are. Sorry I did not keep the link.
If that info is correct, it fits in with the Occidental period. If he had his own SS#, he couldn’t use it and still claim to be a foreign student needing one of the 999 numbers. Truth is our boy was probably using both - or rather from the record you found, all three, a real one and two of the 999 numbers. Why would he have used two different 999 numbers while at Occidental? I also wonder if there is any record keeping of those numbers with disclosure when the recipient is deceased or if they are ever re-used since they are only used temporarily by the holder?
Check out her profile page and you will notice she has a Soetoro agenda. Aka FINO spammer. ‘Nuf said!!!
Today Donald Trump took the lead on the washer women’s show “VIEW” demanding to see Barry’s birth certificate, and the rumor gals were livid!!!
That earns the nomination of the FReeper's "Cod Fish Award"!!!
Yeah, I saw that. LOL
No, I'm just saying they weren't in widespread use and most things got punched in by hand.
2. It seems to me that you are blaming some clerk in Social Security's main processing office in Baltimore for accidentally typing a zero (0) instead of a "9" for Hawaii when the clerk worked on Obama's Social Security application. Is that really fair to workers at the Social Security Administration?
I think so, yes. They are human. They make mistakes.
4. Back in 1977, did ALL Social Security applications from Hawaii go straight to Baltimore?
Yes. According to the SSA, all applications, from Hawaii as well as the rest of the USA, have been processed in Baltimore since 1973:
http://www.ssa.gov/history/ssn/geocard.html
Because a clerk is human and as such is prone to error.
Presumably, Obama filled out the application and WROTE his zip code. It’s more likely that if a typo was made by a clerk, it was a keypuncher or a computer terminal operator. In 1977, the numeric pad would have been used to type numbers. Not the numbers that are along the top of a typewriter. The 0 and the 9 are not adjacent on a numeric keypad of a keypunch machine.
Perhaps, but it is a common typo nevertheless.
If you transcribe ANY initial numeral as a 9, you “get a CT zip code”.
I don't think so.
Upon what basis do you (or Dr. Conspiracy) assume that the zip code had anything to do with assigning SS#s?
See the following link:
http://www.ssa.gov/history/ssn/geocard.html
Why not simply use the state code: CT versus HI?
I don't know, but that's not what the Social Security Administration does. They use the zip code. Period. It doesn't seem to make much sense, but then again, does it surprise you that a government agency does something that doesn't make sense?
And what do you mean by that???
I don't think that is plausible because he had no connection to Connecticut and never visited the state. Hence it would make a most inconvenient mailing address, as it would make it very difficult for him to receive his SS card.
Can you think of a pluasible reason why he would use it?
That's the first I hear of it. Got a link?
You drink, don't you? Let's start with the part I put in bold text. According to your theory, it was a government clerk who made the original typo assigning a CT SSN to someone (allegedly) from HI. Now, it's possible for a government worker to not figure out that a letter is addressed to Honolulu, CT. Do you know how much mail the SSA handles in a daily basis??
I have to confess, my FRiend, you're on some great drugs. C'n I get some of that???
I am not taking the other guys side, but if the number cannot be changed, even if an error occurred, then there is really no need to make a correction. I have no idea “why” I got the number I got. Why should Obama.
That said, there are plenty of reason to question this loser. I am not 100% sure this is one of them.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.