Posted on 01/02/2011 1:00:02 PM PST by opentalk
I am waiting patiently for the full quote, in context, from Mark Levin, plus a link for verification. It shouldn’t take you this long to provide it. [I.e.: the ‘crackpot’ quote, as pertains to Obama’s BC.]
lj, I learned from boxing, if they squeal when you hit 'em, you've hit 'em where it hurts. It seems that Bruce Campbell doesn't have a chin for CQC.
"Anyway, it's a new screenname, but unless you were posting prior to 1999, I've been hear longer than you."
The crackpot clown and dud TNTNT won’t be able to find any quote from Levin to back up his claim. The guy is full of you know what.
Exactly. TNTNT has spent his short time on FR insulting and demeaning good, honest conservatives. He throws around the slur ‘crackpot’ with casual abandon. When he got called on it, he dishonestly blamed Mark Levine. It was TNTNT’s biggest lie yet. An decent person would be ashamed to post after having been exposed as not only the antithesis of a conservative but a liar as well. We shall see.
Oh you sure you are clown . /sarc You certainly thought of every excuse you could think of to pooh pooh Berman's legislation in your post and then you follow it up with a weak statement that we can come together in Texas if we try. LoL. You're suuuuch a "biiiig" proponent for presidential eligibility ballot legislation. You're so full of BS. Kumbaya clown.
He said it on his radio show several months ago. We have pinged him for confirmation, we will see if he replies. Since you read my post #500, what to think of my proposed bill to require a NBC president? BZD and I have discussed this matter and she wants a more comprehensive bill, I prefer the kiss version.
No he has not. Levin has kept mum about about the definition of natural born citizen, however he has on a few occasion mentioned Barack Obama’s missing birth certificate.
He did not say it on his radio show. I checked several sources before posting on the subject. Before I respond to your question, you owe everyone on this thread, plus Levin, a major apology.
If you do the honorable thing and apologize, then you can respond to my previous questions directed to you, which you totally blew off. If you answer them well—i.e.: in a manner that indicates you actually read what I wrote and responded specifically—then I will answer your question.
Why do you ask?
I don’t go running around like you pissing and moaning about saying that it is a crack pot theory that Obama is not qualified for presidential office, and people on this thread have half a brain and other innuendos. Then after you get called on your BS...Oh, I better say something halfway reasonable, I better moderate my views, by saying that I am for eligibility ballot laws, but not after you piss all over an already proposed Texas legislation. That’s talking out both side of you butt.
I stand !00% behind what I said. If you don’t like it, too bad.
It has nothing to do with whether I like it. It has everything to do with the fact that it is a LIE.
Maybe.
But then, I'm not very "constrictive".
If you think you can bait me, you lose. lol
BS troll-bot. There are reams of evidence if not out right proof in hundreds of FR threads that support citizen parents requirement. Parents pass on jus sanguinis citizenship to their offspring and receiving another citizenship at birth besides a US citizenship is real and NOT a crackpot theory. This results in split allegiances, which is an antithesis of natural born citizens.
Your theory the crackpot proposal. I spelled it out as plain as day here.
You attributed words to Levine which he never spoke. You were asked to provide the full quote in context with a link. You can’t do so because he never said it. You have zero credibility, on anything, from here on out.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.