Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Buy a Home, No Money Down!
Fox Business ^ | 12/19/10 | John Stossel

Posted on 12/19/2010 8:32:46 PM PST by logician2u

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last
To: dalereed
When we bought our home no one could get a loan with less than 20% down at any bank...in 1966.

Bought my first home in 1998. The mortgage broker asked whether I could afford 20% down to get a "conventional loan." Wasn't entirely sure what it was at the time--but conventional sounded good--so I did it. No regrets.

21 posted on 12/19/2010 9:24:38 PM PST by NautiNurse (ObamaCare uses Bernie Madoff theory of economics)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: logician2u
It was the low interest rates that spurred lenders to loan, even to non-worthy borrowers

Low interest rates spurred borrowers to borrow. If anything, it would have been a disincentive to lenders, had lenders actually been all that concerned about holding the notes to maturity. They weren't. They were being sold, divided into tranches and sold again. The lenders were profiting from fees and commissions for handling the transaction, not from the paper itself, which barely touched their hot little hands.

Poor credit risks were accepted and financed as a result of government pressure. The risk was not borne by the lenders so heck they didn't give a hoot, recall that they were profiting from fees and commissions, not from the note, which was promptly sold, right along with the risk.

The low interest rates were the result of high demand for treasuries from foreign nations, China for the most part, sending all their dollars back home to roost in treasuries, thereby driving down the yield of the ten year, to which mortgage rates are tied.

22 posted on 12/19/2010 9:46:39 PM PST by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Palter

A true conservative has spoken. Good job.


23 posted on 12/19/2010 10:27:49 PM PST by gunsequalfreedom (Conservative is not a label of convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: gunsequalfreedom; All
Well, so much for attempt #2 to record this sucker all the way through. Program truncated due to unfolding crisis, just my luck.

I'm glad John Stossel's regular weekly programs are on the business channel which sticks to the announced schedule.

One more try in another hour and a half; this time I'll set it and forget it.

24 posted on 12/19/2010 10:38:32 PM PST by logician2u
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: logician2u

That’s why they want everyone’s IRAs and 401ks which ticks me off. I’m not rich, but it’s a decent sum of money at stake if they take it—enough to make me wonder exactly WHAT I would do.


25 posted on 12/20/2010 3:30:50 PM PST by CommieCutter (A Centrist Democrat is now defined as: between Socialism and Communism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: logician2u

Agreed! I watched the whole thing. Made perfect sense to me. What is it with the clueless in Washington? Why do we (collectively) vote these inept and dangerous people into office?


26 posted on 12/22/2010 9:47:50 PM PST by NotJustAnotherPrettyFace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson