Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lakin Goes To Prison - And Here Comes The Next Eligibility Lawsuit
Here's The Right Side Of It ^ | December 18, 2010 | John L. Work

Posted on 12/18/2010 4:14:32 PM PST by JLWORK

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last

1 posted on 12/18/2010 4:14:34 PM PST by JLWORK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: JLWORK

I’m just going to kick back and wait for OldDeckHand to step in and tell us all (again) why this just doesn’t matter and why we should all just run along...


2 posted on 12/18/2010 4:25:49 PM PST by Neidermeyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JLWORK
The Constitution being held in contempt, injures and imparts standing to every citizen of this nation.

Considering the above, one of you with a law degree, can you tell me why or why not, and please elucidate clearly.

3 posted on 12/18/2010 4:38:10 PM PST by W. W. SMITH (Islam is an instrument of enslavement)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Neidermeyer
I'm not Old Deck Hand, but I am a lawyer and I will predict that the Supreme Court will deny certiorari in this case with no recorded dissent.

This case does not raise any eligibility issues, although Orly Taitz doesn' seem to understand that (she raises all kinds of eligibility arguments in her brief, but that issue isn't in the case anymore). The plaintiff in this case who challenged Obama's eligibility was Connie Rhodes. Rhodes dropped the case, fired Taitz and didn't appeal. Because there is no plaintiff in the case anymore, the eligibility issue is no longer part of the case.

The only person appealing to the Supreme Court is Orly Taitz, and the only issue, therefore, is the $20,000 sanction against her. Taitz also seems to misunderstand why she was sanctioned: it was not for bringing the eligibility case. The sanctions order specifies exactly what she was sanctioned for: accusing the judge of "treason" (that's called "contempt of court," for those of you following along at home), and accusing the judge of meeting with Attorney General Holder in a coffee shop across the street from the courthouse in Georgia (on a day when Holder was appearing publicly in Los Angeles).

Judge Land (a conservative Republican appointed by President Bush at the recommendation of Senator Chambliss) specifically held that Taitz was not sanctioned for her original Complaint, but only for the frivolous and contemptuous language in her motion for reconsideration (a motion she legally had no right to file at all, since her client had already fired her).

4 posted on 12/18/2010 4:40:44 PM PST by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Lurking Libertarian

I know a number of attorneys and they all feel obama is ineligible to be the President under Article 2. Do you agree?


5 posted on 12/18/2010 4:47:53 PM PST by omegadawn (qualified)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: JLWORK; LucyT

Pinging on a shameless Kangaroo court, especially on Dr. & Pastor and Patriot James David Manning, PhD, civil rights violations???

http://atlahmedianetwork.org/?p=11907


6 posted on 12/18/2010 4:49:10 PM PST by danamco (")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JLWORK

Is this guy gonna plead guilty too?


7 posted on 12/18/2010 4:51:49 PM PST by pnh102 (Regarding liberalism, always attribute to malice what you think can be explained by stupidity. - Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JLWORK

Taitz discredits any cause she involves herself with.


8 posted on 12/18/2010 5:03:50 PM PST by truth_seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Neidermeyer

You don’t understand. The Old Deck Hand knows that the legal system is far above and superior to a Constitution written by a bunch of gay founders(according to Harry Reid).


9 posted on 12/18/2010 5:11:58 PM PST by Goreknowshowtocheat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Goreknowshowtocheat; Neidermeyer; OldDeckHand

I’m sure you recall the etiquette involved in pinging a Freeper you mention in a comment. I’ll save you the trouble.


10 posted on 12/18/2010 5:19:10 PM PST by SaxxonWoods (Gone Galt and loving it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SaxxonWoods
Thanks. My ears were burning, and I had no idea why.

Frankly, it's embarrassing that anyone who describes themselves as "conservative" would hang their hat on anything that comes from the court jester known as Orly Taitz.

She's an embarrassment. I'll dance a jig, bare-ass naked on the National Mall if the Court grants cert here.

Of course, I'm sure some will use that denial as additional "proof" that Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas are both in on the George Soros super-conspiracy.

11 posted on 12/18/2010 5:29:46 PM PST by OldDeckHand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SaxxonWoods

sorry about mentioning another freeper.......I should not have done that.


12 posted on 12/18/2010 5:33:46 PM PST by Goreknowshowtocheat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand

I think Thomas already admitted they were ducking the issues. Soros told him too duck and cover?


13 posted on 12/18/2010 5:36:26 PM PST by Goreknowshowtocheat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: omegadawn; Lurking Libertarian

I would be interested in this opinion as well


14 posted on 12/18/2010 5:41:32 PM PST by phockthis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Goreknowshowtocheat
"Soros told him too duck and cover?"

Sure, that's it. You know, because Soros and Clearance Thomas are so close - regular drinkin' buddies.

I have it on good authority that George Soros and Antonin Scalia have a time-share in Boca - shh, don't tell anyone.

15 posted on 12/18/2010 5:41:57 PM PST by OldDeckHand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: JLWORK
Taitz must now present her arguments to the Supreme Court – if she’s allowed to do so.

She won't be.

16 posted on 12/18/2010 5:44:03 PM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand

Funny. I just thought it was cowardice and lack of integrity, but now that Soros is involved it makes more sense. You have uncovered a great truth.


17 posted on 12/18/2010 5:48:56 PM PST by Goreknowshowtocheat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand

I’ll dance a jig, bare-ass naked on the National Mall


As long as you don’t end up in a fountain with a known hooker.


18 posted on 12/18/2010 5:53:35 PM PST by maine yankee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: JLWORK

Orly Titz.......... Don’t hold your breath on this one being granted.


19 posted on 12/18/2010 5:57:35 PM PST by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JLWORK

And there ought to be so many of legal cases similar to these that the President thinks they are like flies on his stink.Maybe then the supreme Court will do the Right thing and Honor the Oath administered to all public servants including the despotic branch called the Judiciary.


20 posted on 12/18/2010 6:16:38 PM PST by StonyBurk (ring)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson