Posted on 10/07/2010 1:23:56 PM PDT by Vincent Jappi
We know where all past presidents were born. We have the address for all of them. We are missing our first Black Presidents birth address, and it is racist if we don't ask for it, and then honor it. We need a place for his statue.
LOL. No, I found nothing insightful about any of the comments. That wasn’t my point at all. Almost all took issue with the ‘author’ of this tedious piece regarding his assertion that Sarah Palin should get involved. Utter nonsense.
As for the BC, and the issue you raised, “African” was not a category, but Arab was, and that’s what he’s hiding.
Could be. If there's any kernel of truth at all to Birtherism, it's something like that -- a decision to hide some portion of the records because it was seen as politically embarrassing, followed by a policy of tweaking the Birthers because they create a politically useful distraction and embarrassment to his opposition.
I think his Name was changed to Soebarkah Soetoro, then back to Barak in the last 10 years. His citizenship was changed to Indonesia when he was adopted. That might be included in the records.
His citizenship status is a mess.
Yep, and he’s managed to get it sealed.
For now.
The "kernal" of truth is that Obama is not eligible to be president.
The "kernal" of truth - Obama is not a natural born citizen.
the Birthers because they create a politically useful distraction and embarrassment to his opposition.
Hey, why don't you get the Dems to sing in unison that Obama is a natural born citizen as their main plank in the last 3 weeks. They got nothing else to run on but to "distract" by making junk up about their opponent. If it is such a big "embarrassment" they might be able to get their House seat loss down to 100 in this election. LoL.
So dude, you haven't answered the question, are you a retread troll?
Why take this Communist criminal at his word?
His “admission” that he was born a British subject would be evidence enough that he is ineligible... if you could believe anything he said.
We have no legal proof of who his parents were either.
As a consequence, we might need the birth certificate to establish who they actually were, as well as his real birthplace. There are other means to do that, but a normal investigation would require the relevant legal documents.
Although your reasoning rests on a questionable assumption -whereas eligibility constitutionalists have appeared to be more cautious on that-, at last it is an attempt at argumentation.
The same can’t be said of the name-calling, which must come from socialists, since only socialists deny the others’ rationality, while being themselves unable to argue.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.