Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Challenge Accepted: Conservative gay organization head agrees to debate WorldNetDaily editor
The Daily Caller ^ | September 4, 2010 Updated September 5, 2010 | Chris Moody

Posted on 09/05/2010 10:56:10 AM PDT by Kaslin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300 ... 601-605 next last
To: trisham; Stultis
Of course it was an attack, couched in terms to look like a joke. It doesn't matter. Attacks or jokes do not change the truth.

My brother has been homosexual since he was 17. He's now 59. I have bar hopped gay bars with him and gotten to know his friends. They became my friends. I know what they say, do and think. I have heard it. For more than 40 years. Talking points do not beat first hand info and never will.

261 posted on 09/06/2010 9:14:22 AM PDT by DJ MacWoW (If Bam is the answer, the question was stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 260 | View Replies]

To: TwoLegsGood
I'd ask Chris Barron who thought up the ridiculous moniker for Ann Coulter that she is the "right wing Judy Garland"? (still confused over that one.)

She did.

Ann Coulter to headline Homocon party for gay conservatives next month in New York City

“Of course I’ll do it,” Coulter wrote to GOProud when they asked her to join the event. “I’m the right-wing Judy Garland!”

So who were you before you were zotted?

262 posted on 09/06/2010 9:27:39 AM PDT by DJ MacWoW (If Bam is the answer, the question was stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 228 | View Replies]

To: trisham
much of what you offer as "debate" is simply ad hominem attacks and offensive remarks

LOL! Yeah. And anti-gaycon FReepers would never engage in ad hominem or offensive remarks. (Have you read the thread?)

BTW, like the Tony Snow tribute on your homepage. I was thinking of him just yesterday. I do so almost every Sunday when I tune in FNS.

263 posted on 09/06/2010 9:28:19 AM PDT by Stultis (Democrats. Still devoted to the three S's: Slavery, Segregation and Socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 259 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW
What I'm defending is conservatives like Ann who are willing to try to reach them and teach them to wean themselves off the socialist plantation.

-Well I tried finding a post where you mentioned her. Didn't find one.

That's because I didn't SAY "I'm defending Ann" I said I'm defending conservatives. See? You don't actually read what I post. This is why you don't understand anything I say.

And let's be honest, you don't WANT to understand what I say. You want to be the victim. In this, you are no different from all the other identity-politics types, like gays and Muslims. The only difference is that Christianity is culturally more aligned with true conservatism... sometimes. Not always, which is why you see so many liberal churches.

264 posted on 09/06/2010 9:32:49 AM PDT by A_perfect_lady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 193 | View Replies]

To: Stultis; trisham
And anti-gaycon FReepers would never engage in ad hominem or offensive remarks.

We're fed up with being called bigots for opposing the homosexual agenda. Homosexuals are not being oppressed. They have the same rights as everyone else. They want to mainstream deviant behavior and use the force of government to do so. Enough is enough.

265 posted on 09/06/2010 9:33:58 AM PDT by DJ MacWoW (If Bam is the answer, the question was stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 263 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah
How about “fundamentalist” Jews or Hindus? Are we crap too?

I never called anyone crap. I just said your religion is more important to you than this country. And it is.

266 posted on 09/06/2010 9:35:02 AM PDT by A_perfect_lady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 191 | View Replies]

To: MrEdd
So Christian values are contrary to what is best for this country, and do not deserve priority? Embracing them is never the same as what is in the interest of this nation?

Sometimes yes and sometimes no. Look at all the liberal Christians who think that Jesus wants us to feed the poor, take care of illegal immigrants, oppose even a just war, and turn the other cheek to the Muslim world. And think that a big government is the best way to do it. With your tax money.

267 posted on 09/06/2010 9:37:40 AM PDT by A_perfect_lady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies]

To: A_perfect_lady
That's because I didn't SAY "I'm defending Ann" I said I'm defending conservatives.

Yup. Like Ann. Whom you never mentioned. You simply used the thread to launch attacks on Christians.

You don't actually read what I post

Oh I read it. You've used this thread to attack Christians. Yeah. I read it.

And let's be honest, you don't WANT to understand what I say.

Au contraire I understand perfectly what you say. And you talk out both sides of your mouth.

You want to be the victim.

Nope. that's part of the homosexual agenda. It's listed out quite clearly. Move the debate from moral to a civil rights debate and play the victim. Their problem is that there are no civil rights based on behavior.

In this, you are no different from all the other identity-politics types, like gays and Muslims.

I am neither advocating lopping off someones head nor am I looking for civil rights for a behavior.

Just can't stop bashing Christians, can you.

268 posted on 09/06/2010 9:41:06 AM PDT by DJ MacWoW (If Bam is the answer, the question was stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 264 | View Replies]

To: whatisthetruth
Gays are NOT born that way, where are you getting this erroneous info?

I think they are. I teach middle school and I have already encountered two little boys, 11 years old when I met them, and already just instinctively effeminate. Later both let me know, either directly or through friends, that they were "gay." They had all the stereotypical features: delicate manners, a fascination with artsy crafts, an absolute LOVE of parties. These little boys would bake cakes themselves, decorate them, and bring them in for other kids birthdays, and run around with pretty colored napkins and fuss about arrangements. It was like seeing Martha Stewart in a little boy's body. Bizarre. They developed crushes on other boys (straight boys who usually took it badly, being macho hispanics). I was actually pretty freaked out because I'd never really seen it up close and personal.

Now you may say "oh, they were molested as kids, that's why." But a) what if they weren't, and b) how does being molested make you want to bake cakes and throw parties??

Then there's the dykie little girls I meet... it's pretty weird, but it seems to be just a part of who they are from a very young age.

269 posted on 09/06/2010 9:48:22 AM PDT by A_perfect_lady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 223 | View Replies]

To: trisham
Interesting, how much this sounds like the pro-homosexual agenda. How often have we heard the complaint that "if you knew any gays, you wouldn't be afraid of gay marriage".

You also have not read my posts. I don't want gay marriage at all. I just want to include gays in conservatism. I want their votes for drilling ANWR, stopping illegal immigration, cutting government spending, and lowering taxes. And I want to do that without giving them a damn thing in return except what we all get: a stronger, safer country. Some of them can be reasoned with. But it won't be Christians like the ones on here reasoning with them, it'll be atheists like me, because for you guys, Christianity is more important, and for me, America is more important.

270 posted on 09/06/2010 9:52:30 AM PDT by A_perfect_lady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 247 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW
I don't need to mention Ann, this whole thread is about her. I thought you knew. The fact is, there are thousands of LIBERAL Christians. Look at the majority of African-American churches. Christianity does not equal conservatism. That's my point, and my only point.

I keep hoping if I state it very, very simply... you'll see what I'm actually saying.

271 posted on 09/06/2010 9:58:16 AM PDT by A_perfect_lady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 268 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW

If Ann Coulter said that, she knows nothing of Hollywood culture.

Problem I guess when you are from the East.


272 posted on 09/06/2010 9:58:49 AM PDT by TwoLegsGood ("...my sin is ever before me" - King David)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 262 | View Replies]

To: A_perfect_lady

Your arrogance apparently knows no bounds.


273 posted on 09/06/2010 9:59:22 AM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 270 | View Replies]

To: trisham

Glad you ignored what I actually said. Proves I’m right.


274 posted on 09/06/2010 10:00:12 AM PDT by A_perfect_lady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 273 | View Replies]

To: A_perfect_lady

How do you know if they were molested? What a ridiculous assertion to make.


275 posted on 09/06/2010 10:01:32 AM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 269 | View Replies]

To: A_perfect_lady

No, it proves that imho, you are a liberal, pro-homosexual agenda poster.


276 posted on 09/06/2010 10:02:44 AM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 274 | View Replies]

To: Impy; BillyBoy; fieldmarshaldj; GOPsterinMA; AuH2ORepublican; Clintonfatigued; Dengar01; ...
RE :”Indeed, they got Ted Olsen.

Ted Olsen was on FNS (Chris Wallas) a number of weeks ago and promoted all the liberal arguments for why the US constitution demands that the local governments issue same-sex couples marriage licenses. He cited a previous federal decision that marriage was a basic human right in the constitution as the proof that homosexual marriage is too. He cited the 14th amendment as being passed to give gays this right. It was pathetic. It was an Obama view of the living constitution.

I got one question for these 'conservative' HOMOs: How is it conservative to use liberal judges to insert these NEW RIGHTS into the US constitution?

This is NOT about a HOMO'S freedom to 'do' something. This is about their demands on government for special benefits and using liberal judges to make up new rights for them.

277 posted on 09/06/2010 10:08:24 AM PDT by sickoflibs ("It's not the taxes, the redistribution is the federal spending=tax delayed")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 232 | View Replies]

To: trisham

See? You don’t read my posts. Find where I said I was for gay marriage. Find it, child. Find it.


278 posted on 09/06/2010 10:10:09 AM PDT by A_perfect_lady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 276 | View Replies]

To: A_perfect_lady
I don't need to mention Ann, this whole thread is about her.

The ARTICLE posted is not about her. It is about Farah debating Barron.

The fact is, there are thousands of LIBERAL Christians. Look at the majority of African-American churches. Christianity does not equal conservatism. That's my point, and my only point.

Lie much?

Post 58

And you don't get that with either uber-religious types or sexual-identity politics types.

Post 68

The fact remains that for them, their Christianity comes before the Constitution.

Post 71

Because your religion is affecting your judgment and your priorities.

Post 171

You and all your fellow Christians who are more interested in making a stand for the Old Testament than in weaning gays off of socialism do this country no good. And no, the Founding Fathers weren't fundamentalist Christians who spent more time worrying about sodomy than anything else.

279 posted on 09/06/2010 10:10:58 AM PDT by DJ MacWoW (If Bam is the answer, the question was stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 271 | View Replies]

To: TwoLegsGood

There are more homosexuals than just Hollywood. They LIKE Judy Garland.


280 posted on 09/06/2010 10:11:58 AM PDT by DJ MacWoW (If Bam is the answer, the question was stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 272 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300 ... 601-605 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson