Posted on 06/30/2010 9:16:44 PM PDT by Red Steel
He doesn’t sound very credible to me. His assertion about the BC or lack thereof is just hearsay. The fact that he continues to back Obama is odd at best.
Well, he’s in good hands with HRC and Obama to save him.
We have been whacking Glenn Beck with information on obama’s past. There is so much he didn’t know. But to his credit, he is learning now. We finally got his attention and Trevor Louden has actually thanked him on the New Zeal Blog.
This might be it. Everything we have sent him is verifiable information and documents. WND has taken Trevor’s research, (and ours,) and claimed exclusivity for themselves. I know this because it was done to me personally. That is why I don’t post my info on the open forum anymore.
It is certainly good enough for a grand jury to get the ball rolling against Obama. Adams spoke with his supervisor who said Obama had no Hawaiian birth certificate then you subpeana his boss. And you work your way all over and around the Hawaiian DoH that is how it works.
Here is what the Supreme Court has said about Hearsay evidence and Grand Juries.
"The RULES OF EVIDENCE prohibit the introduction of most HEARSAY evidence in a criminal trial. (Hearsay is evidence given by a person concerning what someone else said outside of court.) However, when Frank Costello, alias Francisco Castaglia, a notorious ORGANIZED CRIME figure of the 1940s and 1950s, argued that his conviction for federal income TAX EVASION should be overturned because the grand jury that indicted him heard only hearsay evidence,
the Supreme Court rejected his claim (Costello v. United States, 350 U.S. 359, 76 S. Ct. 406, 100 L. Ed. 397 [1956]).
...
Justice HUGO L. BLACK, in his majority opinion, rejected these claims, noting that "neither the Fifth Amendment nor any other constitutional provision prescribes the kind of evidence upon which grand juries must act."
-end snip-
http://law.jrank.org/pages/7196/Grand-Jury-Hearsay-Evidence-Admissible-before-Grand-Jury.html
Heasay evidence has its place to get the criminals as it can start investigations into wrongdoing.
Way to go! THANK YOU!
I kinda’ wish they would wait till after the next election to blow the lid off this. This could backfire now, it could look like dirty election tricks to the other side, and it sure would be portrayed as such by the main stream swine media. If we wait until we hold congress next year then something could conceivably be done about it if the Pubs could muster up some cajones’.
Getting it out there now could backfire and cause us to lose our chance at righting the ship of state. I hope I’m wrong and we can rid America of this threat to our future, and take out as many liberals as possible too. But are we falling into a well laid trap?
I know one thing, the blacks would surely riot in every major city in the country.
Expose this fraud each & every chance we get. The sooner the better. No waiting, no calculaing.
Expose this fraud each & every chance we get. The sooner the better. No waiting, no calculaing.
I think the Justices would have to recuse themselves for conflict of interest. I think congress would have to step in since this would be the first in American history of something of this magnitude happening. The whole world would be fixated with this. I think it will happen. A lot of money in the MSM ratings war is to be made with this. Beck could be the man to expose this if his superiors would let him.
It will happen.
God speed the day, and protect the men and women who want to preserve our Constitution and our country.
A purist can’t be concerned about the effect the truth might have; though one might couch the delivery of it in a way to make it more palatable or less inflammatory.
I think it’s more likely the Dems will themselves make legitimacy a bigger issue as Obama unravels. Riots are less likely in that case, if things are slowly and controllably unwound.
As to what is law and what isn’t, executive order and whatnot, we don’t have much precedent and could easily be absorbed with all that until the next election, should it occur.
I happen to believe it is an important constitutionally-based issue, however.
I do too. And if it's found that he's an usurper, i want to see every single person involved in the conspiracy locked up or worse, no matter what it does to the country in the short run. If we don't, then we never have the chance at a "free" America again.
The ether is slow tonight
Pelosi certified Obama as eligible on documents sent to the various Secretaries of State.
Take ‘em all down and lets rebuild this Republic!
Strengthen the things that remain...
Its D-Day and we are on Omaha Beach, the machine gun fire is raining down, the water is full of bodies and blood, but we have landed.
America is exposing Obama and his lies.
Now on the other hand if I were to get a check say for $50,000 I might stop blogging for awhile about the BC.
Obamas weakness is his thin skin and lack of stamina, he has too many fronts, and the BC issue is a figurative “Eastern Front”. It will will drain his resources if it can continue.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.