Obama Eligibility lawsuits, Obama attorneys Perkins Coie Law firm Paid $ 261,206 April quarter 2010

In a statement on his blog, Apuzzo said the next step in his case is a decision from the court.
—This is to inform everyone that the Kerchner et al v. Obama/Congress et al case has been tentatively listed on the merits on Tuesday, June 29, 2010, in Newark, New Jersey. It may be necessary for the panel to move the case to another day within the week of June 28, 2010. The Court will notify us if there is a change.

The panel will determine if there will be oral argument and if so, how much time each side will have to argue. We will know if there will be oral argument no less that one week prior to June 29, 2010.

from the politijab blog:
“Mario finally admitted tonight (on the Dr. Kate internet radio program of April 8, 2010) that the “merits” question, the only issue in the appeal, is standing (injury-in-fact and political question). That’s a significant concession on his part, because he barely touched on the issue in his opening brief, completely ignored standing in his reply brief, and yet the U.S. Attorney’s brief covered the issue of standing extensively. Much to the disappointment of his fans in the BTR chat, Mario admitted that the NBC/eligibility issue is not before the Third Circuit.

Although he tried to minimize it, when asked directly how the Ramsay-Smith debate was ultimately resolved, Mario also had to admit that Congress came down on Smith’s side. Mario mentioned that James Madison submitted an argument that natural born citizenship is based on “jus soli,” which Mario dismissed as “wrong.”

The powers that be yanked the videos where BO is admitting as much in his debates with Alan Keyes.

And they managed somehow to scrub the exchange from Keyes' own memory as he has no recollection of this admission ever taking place.

Amazing, isn't it?

Has Keyes ever said that he has no recollection of this ever being said?

Yes, he's been asked about it many times. If this exchange happened, don't you think Keyes would have used it himself in his testimony in the various eligibility cases he's been part of?

It never happened. Just another one of the many "rope a birther" myths, fabricated out of thin air and tossed out on the internet to see who'll run with it.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.