Posted on 05/21/2010 9:39:52 PM PDT by patlin
I suggest we keep a record of our responses that answered all the canned BS that Jameseeeeeeeee77777 spreads. Cut and paste back at Miss Jammmieeeee. It would save a lot of time on our part.
It’s precisely why he does it. To keep folks busy responding to the same non-sense over and over again. And over again. Etc.
I have spent most of today reading as it was & is still too hot to do much of anything else and I am too cheap to turn the air conditioner on this early in the season. What am I reading? A very interesting book on the complete history of England including the centuries leading up to its formation and now I know why the founders were so fluent in foreign languages, especially Latin & French. What is quite interesting is the fact,that from the beginning of time, nationality/political character was derived by descent. The book covers in depth the definition of feudalism & when & how it came to be however, citizenship by descent has always been embedded in the English Constitution since its inception & thus I am guessing is why they have recently by act of parliament, closed off British citizenship to children born to alien parents & only those who attain natural born status now have to be born to 2 British parents. The Brits finally realized to save their sovereignty, they had better get back to their own founding under constitutional law where it pertains to citizenship. The feudal law & their lust for nanny state entitlements of feudalism have killed their economy & we are now suffering the same demise.
Take a look at Acquisition of U.S. Citizenship By a Child Born Abroad from the U.S. Department of State.
jamseeee, you are very drunk
WKA - erroneous ruling based on english feudal law, not a hundered years of American law
Elg - born to immigrant parents who were at the time of her birth US citizens as they had been naturalized prior to her birth
Elk - held that the 14th was constituional based on the decision in Slaughterhouse that a child born to any parents owing allegiance to a foreign nation was not a US citizen.
Rusk - I have not studied the details of it, but Apuzzo & Donofrio have and your little quip there does not reflect the true nature of the case, you are merely mining for quotes to use
Kwock - never heard of it before today, eill have to read it for myself so I sit on the fence as to a reply to that one & then finally
you bring back the Indiana case - bwahahahaha - it never even saw the light of the ocurt room so to say it precedent when the ruling had nothing to do with the definition of NBC, it was merely a ruling on standing
What does this all show? You dear jamseeee are very drunk and desperate.
..... and overpaid
Barak Sr isn’t his father so it’s a moot point.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.