Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

APRIL 25, 1980--THE DAY JIMMY CARTER KNEW HE WAS A ONE-TERM PRESIDENT
ThirdWaveDave ^ | April 25, 2010 | Dave Logan

Posted on 04/25/2010 6:22:04 PM PDT by patriotgal1787

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-75 last
To: Mr. Jazzy

The reporters who covered Kennedy made a great deal about it. For weeks and months later, all one had to say was “Wabash” and we would bust out laughing...


61 posted on 04/26/2010 4:41:18 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (Impeachment !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: relictele
During Carter's regime, I remember the pain that was inflicted. Besides the high inflation, my parents kept the house at 65 degrees. I remember when winter came around on how I froze my @$$ in the house.

At school, the lunchroom was closed off, therefore we had lunch in the classroom and the rules did not allow us to socialize at that time. Recess was canceled because of energy being used to go inside and outside. Instead we did some busy work.

Lastly, Carter's zealous support for the 55 mph speed limit and the stupid 85 mph speedometer ! Don't forget Joan Claybrook.

Also it was drilled into our heads at school how we need to give up things and need to suffer for the good of society.

One reason I am a member of this site is James Earl Carter.

My sainted mother had us playing along with his 68 degrees thermostat nonsense - remember his ‘cardigan speech?’

62 posted on 04/26/2010 6:28:03 AM PDT by CORedneck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: patriotgal1787

Read Tonight BUMP!


63 posted on 04/26/2010 7:59:39 AM PDT by Pagey (B. Hussein Obama has no experience running anything, except his pedestrian mouth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Leisler
That’s kind of like saying the Jedburg teams that got rounded up by informers in France in WWII did good, except for the intel part. Not to mention, the almost all CIA post WWII native teams that were inserted into Eastern Europe, almost all of them were wiped out. Nice, eh? What’s the point. ( Another, older operation. Bay of Pigs )

Where is the comparison? You listed Son Tay as an example in context of our military failures due to malaise or decay, I said that the Son Tay raid was a success by the military, we raided two compounds, killed perhaps a couple of hundred of the enemy and didn't lose a man, although no prisoners were inside the taken compounds I have always seen Son Tay as one of the great raids in history.

Here is a description.

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

64 posted on 04/26/2010 9:09:18 AM PDT by ansel12 (Romney-"I longed in many respects to actually be in Vietnam and be representing our country there")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: CORedneck
Don't forget Joan Claybrook

I remember that cold hearted bitch.

She was on the hot seat during the 'airbags killing kids' fiasco. It marked one of the few times that the media held the government accountable - not just the elected officials but the departmental heads and anyone who pushed airbags willy-nilly. She did NOT like being questioned and/or doubted.

It was one of those stories that got wiped out by 9/11.

65 posted on 04/26/2010 8:59:41 PM PDT by relictele
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

My company Sgt Major, Murphy, of Co A, 1st Bn, 7htGroup was on the raiding team. Nice little operation that didn’t accomplish it’s goal. Not one single prisoner rescued, all the while tying up rare, skilled talent, resources and equipment for near a year that would of been applied somewhere else with at least some effect.

You need to see the operation, sunk costs of failed enterprises. Men, equipment, money, time are limited. To an extent it is a zero sum. Use them one place and they are not available somewhere else.

I’m not much of a touchy feely self esteem type. The mission failed. Parts of it went fine, but none of it’s goals were accomplished, and at great expense and risk.

That that late into the war, that the intel services, in such a high profile task, proved incompetent really makes one wonder at the intel failure systemic in the war. That the military services seems so blase about the intel sectors, so late in the war points to massive command and institutional incompetence.


66 posted on 04/27/2010 6:00:59 PM PDT by Leisler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Leisler

I understand your point completely, and I agree with you, but the raid itself was conducted fine, what got me off on a different path than you are on was the post that you responded to, #9.

I just didn’t want readers to think that the Son Tay raid was a debacle at the ground level by the soldiers, the raid itself was a success and it seems to have shaken up the North Vietnamese.


67 posted on 04/27/2010 6:20:46 PM PDT by ansel12 (Romney-"I longed in many respects to actually be in Vietnam and be representing our country there")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

You have to wonder why, the military is so anti-raidish, or at least then. I’m actually pro raid, to an extent, in that they do, what was done, destabilize and put at risk that which was once thought safe. They cause the enemy to expend resources defending that which they didn’t defend.

As an exampl, ( if you ignore the immense cost to the allies ) were bombing over Europe. Millions of Axis men, and hundreds of thousands of guns, gun crews, ammunition were tied up that could of been used against ground troops. Even Dieppe raid in 42, not only was a failure, but a test bed, and caused the Axis to have to, again, tie up resources. But, it too was a failure.

The Rangers at Point du Houc. Another intel failure.

Everyone seems to get caught up in the romantic daring do, but seems to not notice a common trait of good men let down by intel. Like the pre 9/11 intel debacle.

I can see from a command standpoint reviewing the history of raids that one would conclude not to do them as it seems that 90% end, despite grand heroic effort, in failure.


68 posted on 04/28/2010 3:03:45 AM PDT by Leisler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon

Looks like some historical life-changing events were omitted from the bio. of this “VETERAN OF THE DAY” -—Gen. Vaught

http://veteransherald.com/default.asp?sourceid=&smenu=1&twindow=Default&mad=No&sdetail=279&wpage=&skeyword=&sidate=&ccat=&ccatm=&restate=&restatus=&reoption=&retype=&repmin=&repmax=&rebed=&rebath=&subname=&pform=&sc=2995&hn=veteransherald&he=.com


69 posted on 06/08/2010 1:54:12 PM PDT by Gemsbok (Dead men tell no tales!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Gemsbok

I just cant believe how many people have no clue as to what happened.


70 posted on 06/08/2010 2:18:45 PM PDT by RaceBannon (RON PAUL: THE PARTY OF TRUTHERS, TRAITORS AND UFO CHASERS!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Kansas58

I was off the coast for this

http://www.rescueattempt.com is my website


71 posted on 06/08/2010 2:21:44 PM PDT by RaceBannon (RON PAUL: THE PARTY OF TRUTHERS, TRAITORS AND UFO CHASERS!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon

I’m sure the folks who wrote this deliberately omitted the most important and disastrous assignment of Vaught’s career. They want people to remain clueless.

please see freepmail


72 posted on 06/08/2010 2:44:28 PM PDT by Gemsbok (Dead men tell no tales!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: buccaneer81
To this day, the Russians regret not taking their best shot 30 years ago.

Carter was tough on the Russians, he showed them after he pulled us out of the Moscow Olympics. /s

73 posted on 06/08/2010 2:48:29 PM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

LOL!


74 posted on 06/08/2010 2:56:16 PM PDT by buccaneer81 (ECOMCON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Al B.
As bad as Carter was (and the American people knew it), he was in the race with Reagan until the end. With 10 days to go 'til the election, the race was essentially dead even and Carter was on the rise. The reason?...Ronald Reagan had not closed the deal with the voters.

Agree. The author's conclusion is unsupported by historical fact. Carter didn't lose the 1980 election until the debate.

75 posted on 06/08/2010 3:02:23 PM PDT by Terabitten ("Don't retreat. RELOAD!!" -Sarah Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-75 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson