Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Christianity and Social Justice, a False Comparison
Conservative Hideout 2.0 ^ | 3-25-10 | Matt

Posted on 03/25/2010 8:49:48 AM PDT by ConservativeHideout

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last
To: ConservativeHideout

Social justice is the making a ‘system’ and/or ‘state’ god. And the willingness to ‘deem’ the ‘system’ and/or ‘state’ the creator of rights, they the ‘system’ and/or ‘state’ called government can give or take. We are about there with the majority support from the religious community.


21 posted on 03/25/2010 10:52:07 AM PDT by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Just mythoughts

Social justice is likely mystery babalyon.


22 posted on 03/25/2010 11:02:19 AM PDT by cowboyusa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: cowboyusa
Social justice is likely mystery babalyon.

Yes, in that the word 'babylon' means confusion. It is the state of mind held by the majority of peoples on this earth at an appointed time. And most especially in majority religious circles that are as much behind BamBamKennedy 'death' care as anyone.

BamBamKennedy 'death' care was a product of the life work of that old 'lion' of the Senate Ted Kennedy. I intend to make sure he gets the 'credit'.

23 posted on 03/25/2010 11:21:57 AM PDT by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: IronJack

And Robin Hood was reclaiming for the people what the government had taken from them. Neither the King nor the Sheriff were rich- they just had the peasant’s money taken as “taxes”.


24 posted on 03/25/2010 2:15:24 PM PDT by philled ("There's always money in the banana stand."-- George Bluth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Matchett-PI

Thank you so much for this. It couldn’t come at a better time. I teach RE on Sunday and have to cover “Social Justice”. This entire thread works beautifully to form my lesson.


25 posted on 03/26/2010 4:37:26 AM PDT by Aggie Mama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Aggie Mama

“Thank you so much for this. It couldn’t come at a better time. I teach RE on Sunday and have to cover “Social Justice”. This entire thread works beautifully to form my lesson.” ~ Aggie Mama

You’re welcome! Here’s another thread you may want to check out, too:

Pope’s New Encyclical Speaks Against New World Order
Lifesitenews.com ^ | July 8, 2009 | John-Henry Westen
http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2009/jul/09070812.html

Posted on Wednesday, July 08, 2009 10:54:25 PM by Pope Pius XII
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-religion/2288576/posts

Editorial by John-Henry Westen

July 8, 2009 (LifeSiteNews.com) - Newspapers, blogs, talk-shows on radio and television are full of discussion over Pope Benedict XVI’s supposed call for a “new world order” or a “one-world government.” These ideas are, however, neither based in reality nor a clear reading of the Pope’s latest encyclical, Caritas in Veritate, the release of which yesterday spawned the heated discussion.

The Pope actually speaks directly against a one-world government, and, as would be expected from those who have read his previous writings, calls for massive reform of the United Nations.

Confusion seems to have come from paragraph 67 of the encyclical, which has some choice pull-quotes which have spiced the pages of the world’s news, from the New York Times to those of conspiracy theorist bloggers seeing the Pope as the Anti-Christ.

The key quote which has led to the charge reads: “To manage the global economy; to revive economies hit by the crisis; to avoid any deterioration of the present crisis and the greater imbalances that would result; to bring about integral and timely disarmament, food security and peace; to guarantee the protection of the environment and to regulate migration: for all this, there is urgent need of a true world political authority, as my predecessor Blessed John XXIII indicated some years ago.”

However, in paragraph 41, the Holy Father specifically differentiates his concept of a world political authority from that of a one-world government. “We must,” he says “promote a dispersed political authority.” He explains that “The integrated economy of the present day does not make the role of States redundant, but rather it commits governments to greater collaboration with one another. Both wisdom and prudence suggest not being too precipitous in declaring the demise of the State. In terms of the resolution of the current crisis, the State’s role seems destined to grow, as it regains many of its competences. In some nations, moreover, the construction or reconstruction of the State remains a key factor in their development.”

Later in the encyclical (57) he speaks of the opposite concept to one- world government -subsidiarity (the principle of Catholic social teaching which states that matters ought to be handled by the smallest, lowest or least centralized competent authority) - as being essential. “In order not to produce a dangerous universal power of a tyrannical nature, the governance of globalization must be marked by subsidiarity,” says the Pope.

Another of the key quotes which is being extracted for shock value from the encyclical is this: “In the face of the unrelenting growth of global interdependence, there is a strongly felt need, even in the midst of a global recession, for a reform of the United Nations Organization, and likewise of economic institutions and international finance, so that the concept of the family of nations can acquire real teeth.”

Since long before his papacy, Joseph Ratzinger has vigorously fought the United Nations’ vision of a ‘New World Order’. As early as 1997, and repeated subsequently, Ratzinger took public aim at such a vision, noting that the philosophy coming from UN conferences and the Millennium Summit “proposes strategies to reduce the number of guests at the table of humanity, so that the presumed happiness [we] have attained will not be affected.”

“At the base of this New World Order”, he said is the ideology of “women’s empowerment,” which erroneously sees “the principal obstacles to [a woman’s] fulfillment [as] the family and maternity.” The then-cardinal advised that “at this stage of the development of the new image of the new world, Christians - and not just them but in any case they even more than others - have the duty to protest.”

Benedict XVI in fact repeats those criticisms in the new encyclical. In Caritas in Veritate, the Pope slams “practices of demographic control, on the part of governments that often promote contraception and even go so far as to impose abortion.” He also denounces international economic bodies such as the IMF and World Bank (without specifically naming them) for their lending practices which tie aid to so-called ‘family planning.’ “There is reason to suspect that development aid is sometimes linked to specific health-care policies which de facto involve the imposition of strong birth control measures,” says the encyclical.

Any vision of a proper ordering of the world, of international economics or political cooperation, suggests the Pope, must be based on a “moral order.” That includes first and foremost “the fundamental right to life” from conception to natural death, the recognition of the family based on marriage between one man and one woman as the basis of society and freedom for faith and cooperation among all peoples based on principles of natural law.


26 posted on 03/26/2010 5:59:48 AM PDT by Matchett-PI (Sowell's book, Intellectuals and Society, eviscerates the fantasies that uphold leftist thought)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Matchett-PI

Thank you for your post on this subject-— and if you have a ping list, please add me! I will be using this short list of quotes frequently, I think, as a resource.


27 posted on 03/26/2010 6:37:19 AM PDT by Mrs. Don-o ("Do you mean now?" ---Yogi Berra, when asked "What time is it?" ---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o

You’re welcome. I don’t have a ping list, but I’ll try and remember to ping you when I post on this subject.


28 posted on 03/26/2010 9:10:24 AM PDT by Matchett-PI (Sowell's book, Intellectuals and Society, eviscerates the fantasies that uphold leftist thought)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson