S o S

Yes, political appointees like Eric Holder and Jeffrey Taylor are indeed politicized and for that reason alone neither Holder nor Taylor is likely to let a quo warranto action get out from under their direct control.

Holder won't have a say so if a DC court goes after Obama under Quo Warranto.

And every day that Obama is in office, more US Attorneys and more federal judges are becoming his appointees.

To your delight I'm sure. Maybe the Repubs will do the same to the Rats as they did to Bush by holding up, and refusing federal appointments to the bench.

The only “DC court” that has been requested to hear Quo Warranto concerning Barack Obama is the US District Court for the District of Columbia.
The Chrysler dealers’ attempt at a quo warranto motion in the southern district of New York Bankruptcy court has been dismissed.
By the way, Bush appointee Jeffrey Taylor is now out as US Attorney for the District of Columbia and Obama’s new appointee is Ronald C. Machen, Jr.

The only “DC court” that has been requested to hear Quo Warranto concerning Barack Obama is the US District Court for the District of Columbia.

It is where there is a statute to bring about Quo Warranto against the DC critters and could be some more coming down the pike against Obama.

By the way, Bush appointee Jeffrey Taylor is now out as US Attorney for the District of Columbia and Obama’s new appointee is Ronald C. Machen, Jr.

So. If Obama is ever found to be an usurper that he is, his appointees careers as is would be tenuous at best.

We only need 1 case to get to trial on the merits to blow it wide open Obot.

In order to do that:
(1) the plaintiffs have to be in the right court.
(2) The plaintiffs have to have the right lawyers.
(3) The plaintiffs must be the right plaintiffs.

(1)The Right Court:
Constitution says Federal District Court in Washington, DC. for a Writ of Quo Warranto. You want a Birth Certificate? The State Courts of Hawaii. Hawaiian Law absolutely requires that it be made public, because it has been used as the basis of public statements made by state officials. Unless they are liars.
(2) The Right Lawyers:
The Taitz-Kreep-Berg crowd has been outmaneuvered on just basic procedure. You know? Like what day it is and what court are we in, again? They are supposed to be "Birthers," but they didn't even bother to explore the Hawaiian options open to them until recently. OTOH, Team Obama is using the highest-priced talent in the land, backed up by the highest-priced local legal talent in every jurisdiction as required. Newsflash: "highest-priced" = the "Best" (usually). The score: Team Obama: 54, The legal Little League 0. No surprise there.
(3) The Right Plaintiffs:
The most glaring legal weakness: Not one (1) major Republican candidate, not one (1) elected Republican on the state or federal level has come forward to put his name on a lawsuit. Not (1). So we are left with military officers who want to know whether or not their orders are valid, etc.

The people are the plaintiff. The people have been wronged. The only court in the land where this can be constitutionally addressed is the Federal District Court in Washington, D.C. The Attorney General has first crack at being the people's representative. After he turns it down, and only then, can a lawyer petition that court to act in his place. Imagine how long that rigamarole can take! BTW, that court is as political as they come. You want to see foot-dragging, obfuscation, dilatory tactics? You is in the right place.

OK! There is some good news. Mario Apuzzo and Leo Donofrio, a couple of decent New Jersey Americans and sharp attorneys, have managed to maneuver this onto the right track, despite the damage already done to the case by ineptitude (and worse.). They may, MAY, manage to get this through the Federal District courts and onto SCOTUS for an appeal, and a determination, finally, on what a "Natural Born Citizen," is.

But get real. By that time, BHO, Jr.'s term could very well be over. State legislators are making many harrumphing noises (what they do best) about requiring proof of eligibility for 2012. But I have talked to quite a few, and they are all hung up on birth certificates. Our Fearlessly Ineligible Leader could have been born atop the Washington Monument on the 4th of July, been immediately baptized by a gay Episcopal Female Bishop, and been serenaded by the Marine Band. Still does not make that son of a Subject of the Crown a "Natural Born Citizen."

Your heart is in the right place, Red Steel. But what's right and what's law can be mighty different.

Ping!

I believe that both attorneys are totally competent.

But they are being financed by those who wish to ensure that the TRUE long form birth certificate never sees the light of day, while making sure that such a Courtroom Circus is Created that everybody can laugh at it, AND any any American who is curious about BHO's true country of origin and true biological parents.

Someday I plan to learn who are the major advertisers of Glenn Beck and of Hugh Hewitt, to make absolutely positive that noone I know every knowingly buys any of their products; meantime, though, I won't allow either of them to ever be on a running radio within heariing distance of my ears.

I don't trust any of the BC attorneys -- the Chicagoan Andy Martin is characterized as a kook. Philip Berg is a known BFF of Bill & Hillary's, and there are records that Orly contributed to Democrats during the time she was a AIPAC representative.

WHY is this Israeli immigrant so interested in this matter?

I trust the people. We are in charge of our government, and not these attorneys bringing their version of the fix to court. This is my biggest problem with citizens-qua-spectators to the process. I am not awaiting a savior; I am the sovereign of the state. (I understand most citizens lack the information to effect necessary changes that will restore the balance of power; this is why, as soon as I understand what is going on, I post the explanation on my blog.)