Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Frustrated Homeowner Bulldozes $350k Home Ahead of Foreclosure (Video Report)
hotairpundit ^ | 2/20/10 | HAP

Posted on 02/20/2010 7:53:25 PM PST by Talkradio03

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-119 last
To: TXDuke

““1. Because the banks loaned money they did not have.” This is simple BS. They had the money, but lost it due to the housing market crash.”

I’ll only address the first one because it is so blatantly wrong that it defeats all of your arguments.

Banks were allowed and encouraged to loan ‘money’ unsecured by actual deposits. They were and are allowed to loan each dollar up to 10 times. Effectively printing money which led to the huge increases in home “values” as “investors” used money that didn’t exist to buy homes which were increasing in value at unheard of rates.

Then when Soros, Michael Dell and a couple other extremely wealthy people withdrew $700 Billion from the market within a few hours the bill came do. Companies that had been in operation for decades suddenly had to pay their bills. Only they couldn’t because the money did not exist. Again, they were leveraged $10 for every $1 they actually had.

So they went belly up and were bought for a song. I think it was WaMu that was purchased by JPMChase for 10 cents on the dollar. Coincidentally JPMC is a big supporter of Obama with its CEO personally donating $60k to the election.

So all this funny money gets yanked out of the economy, taxes go up, jobs disappear, incomes decline drastically and you blame the individual. Morgan Stanly, Lehman Brothers et al are the evidence you are wrong.


101 posted on 02/23/2010 6:14:23 PM PST by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: TXDuke

“For some reason, you seem to think it is ethical to break the law “

When the law is not ethical or moral it is biblical and ethical to break those laws. Especially after the leaders and govt have refused to adhere to biblical law.


102 posted on 02/23/2010 6:15:52 PM PST by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: TXDuke

Cmon over, you’ll find an appropriate greeting.


103 posted on 02/23/2010 6:16:49 PM PST by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: TXDuke

You should turn on Hannity right now. They are talking about exactly this. How the govt(dems) is shielding the banks from their corruption.


104 posted on 02/23/2010 6:17:59 PM PST by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver

“When the law is not ethical or moral it is biblical and ethical to break those laws. Especially after the leaders and govt have refused to adhere to biblical law.”

I don’t know what Bible you’re reading, but maybe you should reread it. NOWHERE in the Bible does it say that. In fact it says “Give unto Caeser what is Caesars”. It is NEVER ethical to cheat and steal, which is exactly what you’re advocating.


105 posted on 02/23/2010 6:18:35 PM PST by TXDuke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver

“Cmon over, you’ll find an appropriate greeting.”

What, you think it is alright to do it to another business (ie. the bank), but you don’t think it is right for someone to do it to you? What a hypocrite!!!


106 posted on 02/23/2010 6:19:41 PM PST by TXDuke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: TXDuke

It also says our govt is responsible for adhering to biblical law.

“Give unto Caeser what is Caesars” is one of the more misunderstood and misused passages.


107 posted on 02/23/2010 6:20:06 PM PST by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver

“You should turn on Hannity right now. They are talking about exactly this. How the govt(dems) is shielding the banks from their corruption.”

I really doubt Hannity would advocate bulldozing the bank’s property or stealing from the banks. You probably hear what you want to hear just so you can justify your immoral actions.


108 posted on 02/23/2010 6:20:58 PM PST by TXDuke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: TXDuke

If I steal from my customers I would not expect them to pay me.


109 posted on 02/23/2010 6:21:05 PM PST by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver

“It also says our govt is responsible for adhering to biblical law.”

Wrong again. There NOTHING in the Bible that says the government is obligated to follow Biblical teachings. Furthermore, NOTHING in the Bible would support your belief that destroying the bank’s property or stealing from the bank is alright. You’re moral compass sure is screwed up.


110 posted on 02/23/2010 6:22:45 PM PST by TXDuke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: TXDuke

enjoy your naive life, you obviously can’t understand what is really happening to our country.

Goldman Sachs was in bankruptcy but was paid for every dollar they stole.


111 posted on 02/23/2010 6:22:59 PM PST by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver

“If I steal from my customers I would not expect them to pay me.”

Why should your customers pay you if anyone in your industry steals from its customers? That is exactly what you’re advocating by lumping all the banks together. Also, if a customer feels you stole from them then does that give them the right to bulldoze your business in protest? See, your argument is mind numbing.


112 posted on 02/23/2010 6:24:42 PM PST by TXDuke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver

“Goldman Sachs was in bankruptcy but was paid for every dollar they stole”

Again, I call BS on this because Goldman Sachs didn’t steal all of their money nor do the facts support your allegation. Besides you may think me to be naive, but I know darn well what is happening to our country. Problem is the conservatives will never unite because we have people like you that believe in taking immoral and unethical actions just to get even. I may be naive, but at least I’m ethical. Can’t say the same for you though.


113 posted on 02/23/2010 6:27:12 PM PST by TXDuke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: TXDuke

good bye


114 posted on 02/23/2010 6:28:22 PM PST by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver

“Banks were allowed and encouraged to loan ‘money’ unsecured by actual deposits. They were and are allowed to loan each dollar up to 10 times. Effectively printing money which led to the huge increases in home “values” as “investors” used money that didn’t exist to buy homes which were increasing in value at unheard of rates. So all this funny money gets yanked out of the economy, taxes go up, jobs disappear, incomes decline drastically.”

Your own argument states that the government, Dell, & Soros are to blame for our economy; not the banks. I think you’re confusing yourself now or just don’t quite understand the economy very well.

I only blame the individual when the individual was so stupid as to take a home loan he could afford or charge up those credit cards that he couldn’t afford. NOBODY MADE HIM BUY ANYTHING EVER! What part of that concept goes so far over your head?


115 posted on 02/23/2010 6:30:40 PM PST by TXDuke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver

“good bye”

Well look at the bright side, we may not like each other or agree on too many things, but at least we both have the right to our own opinions and the right (for now at least) to debate those opinions.

goodbye...


116 posted on 02/23/2010 6:32:08 PM PST by TXDuke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: Eye of Unk
I would have done the same thing.

Under the same circumstances, I'd certainly have considered it. The foreclosure was not due to missing payments, but was due to the IRS going after his business. Maybe he should have bulldozed the IRS office instead.

117 posted on 02/23/2010 6:40:54 PM PST by meyer ("It's not enough just to not suck as much as the other side" - G. Beck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TXDuke

You’re operating based on the old rules. The banking system has moved on to a new set of rules where you pay their bills and yours.

I’ll give you the last word.


118 posted on 02/23/2010 6:48:41 PM PST by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver

Thanks for the last word....

I still assert that even if the bank has fishy rules, a responsible person just needs to walk away and avoid all loans/credit cards from them. If the person still choses to do business with the banks, they do so at their own risk and by their own choice.


119 posted on 02/23/2010 7:02:22 PM PST by TXDuke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-119 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson