ikeonic: Victim of Palin Zot

Ikeonic ^ | 12/5/2009 | Ikeonic

[PSYCHO-FREEP]

WOW!

This troll made it almost a year!

[glock rocks]

If you’re any indication of the type of intellect we’ll be seeing in trolls this weekend, it’s going to be a long one.

Have you EVER seen a troll on here with a formidable intellect.

I'm really disappointed with the quality of troll lately.

[KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle]

I'm really disappointed with the quality of troll lately.

They're on the wrong side of destiny, once again. (So what else is new...?) ;)

[glock rocks]

[Jacob Kell]

Did she really have the free time to be able to do so? Also, the Alaskan gov. is working on that as we speak, if I’m not mistaken.

[FTJM]

Free time? It was her job as Governor.

[Outlaw Woman]

I see that this wonderful intellect got his account banned. What a dumbass.

[foutsc]

Congratulations! Another independent thinker silenced!

If anyone had bothered to crawl out from under their rock and actually investigate, Ike has a blog with over two years of writing in it. He is not a closet liberal; he's a conservative.

Anyway, your happy group-think bubble is secure again... Have fun with your political hero worship.

[KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle]

[Outlaw Woman]

I've been here a little over a year now (yea me!) and as far as I've seen, independent thinking is always encouraged...however, stupidity is not. So get off your self righteous soap box.

[wagglebee]

Anyway, your happy group-think bubble is secure again... Have fun with your political hero worship.

Being a bit hypocritical there aren't you troll?

You and your fellow trolls love to talk about "Reagan's Eleventh Commandment" even though that is a total falsehood and then you come into a CONSERVATIVE FORUM and criticize conservatives for not supporting your hatred of genuine conservatives.

What precisely is wrong with "group think"? This is a CONSERVATIVE FORUM, it is a given that conservatives will agree on most issues.

This IS NOT blog pimp central for you and your libertarian ilk.

[Jacob Kell]

What I meant to say was did she have available time to do so when she had to face a continuous barrage of attacks. Considering that she was the target, I think that she would have reformed that ethics law if she was able to.

[glock rocks]

I’m really disappointed with the quality of troll lately.

[foutsc]

This is not about "support," it's about a free exchange of ideas, and this particular exchange was within the bounds of conservative thinking. Are you going to banish Roger Simon beyond the pale as well?

Somebody has a reading problem. I never stated a hatred for Palin. She's in the arena and she has a chance to prove herself. I could direct you to my two year record of discussing conservatism, but then the whole "blog whore" thing would come up again...

If anybody needs the butt hurt report, it is those who scream when someone dares criticize their hero.

American needs a strong conservative president to put things back together in three years. Sarah may be that person, but we don't know yet. I prefer a vigorous debate some good political combat among those seeking the GOP nomination. I don't know what banning people accomplishes...

[wagglebee]

This is not about "support," it's about a free exchange of ideas, and this particular exchange was within the bounds of conservative thinking.

Nope, you and your ilk get upset when conservatives reject your criticism of conservatism.

I could direct you to my two year record of discussing conservatism,

Your homepage says that you are a LIBERTARIAN, that IS NOT the same as being a conservative.

American needs a strong conservative president to put things back together in three years. Sarah may be that person, but we don't know yet. I prefer a vigorous debate some good political combat among those seeking the GOP nomination.

Then why are you supporting someone who wrote a blog dedicated to defeating a conservative.

I don't know what banning people accomplishes...

It eliminates the non-conservatives.

[Outlaw Woman]

Making quite an issue out of this aren't you? Please see POST 270 and in the famous words of Forest Gump, whom I sure you can relate, "that's all I got to say about that."

[Pan_Yan]

I asked about thirty posts ago what the zot worthy crime was and never got a definitive answer. I like Palin and would be happy to vote for her but I think the hysteria is over the top. Root for your football team. Question your politicians.

How many of the posters on this thread are in states with open primaries? How many of them have contacted their representatives about getting the primaries closed?

[foutsc]

Here's the help you asked for:

You should check "Other" for the first group and fill in Free Republic.

I think you should check the the first block in the next two sections, and then the last section you should write in "I got the mean poopy pants banned."

If you need more help filling out the form let me know.

I checked out your blog, btw, and it is a nice, professional setup.

[glock rocks]

American needs a strong conservative president to put things back together in three years. Sarah may be that person, but we don't know yet. I prefer a vigorous debate some good political combat among those seeking the GOP nomination. I don't know what banning people accomplishes...

I hear what you are saying, and I'll admit I'm a small l conservative. However, comma, I'll be damned if I'll sit still for the media to select the candidates to run against the marxists in the coming election. These are the folks who brought you Viagra Bob Dole and "maverick" sensation Manchurian McCain, and I don't have to listen to endless static and BS here. Moose muffins. I don't particularly care for a free exchange of ideas. I'm looking to promote strategy to kick some marxist ass. Got idea? ... or are you working with them?

[thecodont]

Nice form. Made me think of this Classic Internet Flame Form (1998):

http://search.bikelist.org/beta/TreeView.aspx?id=281337