Posted on 11/12/2009 6:01:58 PM PST by opentalk
This is what happens when You let an Apparently KENYAN BORN COMMUNIST RADICAL who has stated he “only supports some parts of the U.S. Constitution” hide ALL of His Past, including where he was Born, All of His Medical and Academic Records, All of His Passport and Travel records, All of His Professional Records and Financial Records, Realize He NEVER WROTE HIS ALLEGED “MEMOIRS”, ignored the Fact that ge Never Had a Real Position of Responsibility and Decision making, Ignored that He Campaigned as a US Senator for a Third World Thug and Possible Murderer, and then You Give HIM the MOST POWERFUL and MOST RESPONSIBLE POSITION IN ALL OF THE WORLD’S HISTORY because He is GOOD AT READING A TELEPROMPTER AND OBFUSCATING THE TRUTH!
MAY GOD SAVE OUR AMERICA AND OUR WORLD!!
That’s right and if there is a special call at 3:00 am to half a dozen anti-gun Senators they’ll vote on the treaty and ratify it before we know what’s happening.
Then there will be blood...
Its DOA if he tries. Treaties are subordinate to the Constitution and cannot override the protections stated therein. They can only be valid within the confines of the authority granted to our government by the Constitution. Plenty of controlling case law on this already exists including the recent Supreme Court smack down ruling in Medillan v Texas 2008. More here: http://supreme.justia.com/constitution/article-2/19-constitutional-limitations-on-treaty-power.html
Most likely you're right. But what if it's something else like Cap and Trade? Say 10 years down the road gas is $10/gallon, electricity rates have tripled, and there is no more middle class. Do we as citizens just sit there and become a third world country, or do we say "enough!"?
See #42
Geez, 42 posts into the thread and no one's bothered to see if SB-2099 exists in this Senate session (it doesn't) and no one's bothered to look on SNOPES.COM to see if this is a hoax (it is, and has been since May of this year.)
What's become of Freepers who knee-jerk react first, and don't bother to look for the facts?
See #42
I sure wish I had bought stock in firearms and ammo companies about a year and half ago.
from article:
The decision, announced in a statement released by the U.S. State Department, overturns the position of former President George W. Bush's administration, which had opposed such a treaty on the grounds that national controls were better.
There is a lack of trust with the current administration and our constitution.
I don’t want to make any secret of it. (not that I could after nine years of posting) Try to confiscate my guns and I will go jihad like no stinkin’ Muzzie ever dreamed of. Can you dig it? Got that copied?
Let the blue helmets come collect........
They’d be more terrified in the backwoods of West Virginia than the jungles of Rwanda.
Think 1775 and Lexington Green — only NATIONWIDE!!
bang bump
Check out — and join — OATHKEEPERS.
Large number of LEOs and ex-military there.
BS. He’d need 2/3’s of Congress and there would be the resulting lawsuits that would, ultimately, be decided by the SCOTUS.
He can’t sidestep Congress.
That is why Obama wants a civilian military that is just as strong, just as powerful as the military because he knows they will not follow all of his evil orders.
All that I have spoken to will do the right thing
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.