Posted on 10/11/2009 1:32:18 PM PDT by Elderberry
I thought Stanley Ann was a female of gender???
Now the birthers think if they don’t talk to us, it’ll all be ok. I think this is a good sign. It means they are starting to have doubts. They are on their way to recovery.
parsy, who looks forward to the prodigals returning to the fold, although I am going to miss Orly
Maybe FR management is trying to tell you something?
Since when is honest debate “being on a mission”???? Every time the birthers discover some new “evidence” I always look at it. More than willing to. I think we are harsh on Orly, but she deserves it for misleading these people with foolishness.
parsy, who is shaking his head
Somehow, that seems so appropriate on this thread at this stage! LOL
parsy, who isn’t on a mission
The birthers don’t want to have a real conversation about the issues and the law. They want to appear as defenders of the Constitution even while sacrificing the rule of law to pursue their own mission - to remove Obama from office at any cost. They claim that they want only the truth, but if the truth doesn’t fit their agenda, they reject it and then attack it.
Tex, who may start a ping list for Orly Taitz whack-a-mole threads
I think some are sincere and have been duped by Orly and others. She files some BS Motion and a lot of the birthers don’t know any better. It looks like good law if you don’t know law. Others are just what you say - intent on getting Obama at any cost. Just don’t confuse them with the facts.
parsy, who remembers what Bob the Baptist said - He went to Bourbon Street because it was where he was needed the most
Maybe FR management is trying to tell you something?
***Let’s see, one of the mods posts a definition of TROLL, and then they finally get around to using their own definition when they tell the obnoxious CoLB star travelling troll to stop visiting these threads. If they’re trying to tell anyone something, it’s CoLB trolls that their time is up.
COINTELPRO Techniques for dilution, misdirection and control of a ...
(Trolling 101) E-Mail and Freepers. Posted on 01/16/2009 12:36:53 PM PST by ...
http://freerepublic.com/focus/news/2165967/posts?page=254
You want to remove the Presidnet of the United States from office, you can impeach him,
***Yup, unfortunately that’s true. And since we couldn’t get the congress to convict an obvious perjurer when there was incontrovertible blue-dress evidence, there’s even less of a chance to get them to go after Obama. This thing is a definite long shot, and the only thing we can really do is exact a political payment of some damage to zer0bama’s presidency. The best part about it is the leverage — he’s spending more than $1M to fight this, when he could make it go away for $10, so that’s a difference of 6 figures as leverage. No other topic has that much leverage, so there’s no reason not to keep plugging away and drawing blood.
IMO when 0bama finally “resigns” or gets close - crap revealed, public outcry, or something like that - a huge bugzapper thread will occur.
I think 0bama will be out within a year.
Add me if you do. I suspect there'll be quite a bit of activity this week.
Many if not most historical revelations start with the unwashed against the class that have garnered for themselves princely titles and perfumed themselves with self-righteousness. They are often hideous in their condescension.
The issue here now in this case is not the ‘dittziness’ of Taitz and her loyal following of less than perfect practitioners nor the sloppiness of the material submitted, the issue is the judge and how he looks ahead at appeals.
The judge is pulling for Taitz by offering the comment last week that he would have ‘suggestions concerning standing’. So it matters not how Taitz is viewed condescendingly by you and other fellow egoists, whether she ‘did her homework’, whether the lists were scrutinized, etc. What matters to the judge is whether a decision of his to deny dismissal based on adequate standing can be upheld in appeals.
And we can be sure that defendants will be in appeals court the same day that motion to dismiss is denied.
Not at all. Merely stating a fact that Orly tossing in all this bogus BS a week after the hearing will have no impact at all on Judge Carter's decision. He'll go with what he has.
Believe it or not. You can't buy this kind of comedy.
Then he should present them in a court of law unless his legal team is afraid that they are forgeries.
My point is that it doesn't matter if they are.
So forgery is okay with you.
You want to remove the Presidnet of the United States from office, you can impeach him
If he is not legally qualified according to the Constitution to be President, then he is at best still only a President-elect, and doesn't need to be impeached to be removed from the Oval Office.
or call a Constitutional Convention and amend to Constutition, to allow for some other type of removal.
or just enforce the Constitution that we already have with its XX Amendment that is already there.
Period.
Period.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.