Posted on 09/21/2009 5:37:18 PM PDT by rxsid
Do what? I was adopted at age 7. I have known my real father all my life and my entire family.
My BC was changed and shows my adopted dad as my father.
How can he be adopted and have an amended BC?
Doesn't matter. His father would still not have been a US citizen, which is what matters. Rummy Chick has looked into the British law at the time, and a legal marriage does matter. But it's complicated, since much of the British empire did allow polygamy, their nationality laws allowed for that, so the place of marriage and the legal domicile of the British subject parent seem to matter as to British nationality at birth.
"Dual Citizenhip" is something of a Red Herring, it's the nationality status of the parents, plural, that counts.
It is all part and parcel of the collage and we will find him in jeopardy politically and legally.
Barry O.’s records are in jeopardy of being opened at some point. There is no reason to keep them sealed.
There was no anonymity attached to the circumstances of his adoption, so those records protect no one except Barry O.
Tah, duh! Document fraud, wire fraud and multiple interstate felonies.
Fix that.
Again, have him explain a fraudulent document. The COLB.
My wife and I, both divorced, got married 1983 in Sweden, she American and I Danish, had to provide proper divorce certificates, or NO marriage!!!
You are forgiven, maybe. LOL /s
Nope! He won’t survive the political heat for submitting a fraudulent document. NBC or no.
Citizen? Okay, but not NBC.
During that time I also sent e-mails to the department, but they never answered!!!
And then we are back to Fife story???
Your first line; wouldn’t Indonesia come into play here???
BTW, didn’t he get his opponent’s divorce(?) unsealed when he ran for Illinois Stare???
I have gone through all posts, and quite enjoyable reading without the “disturbance” of the fifth brigade!!!
Yes Sir they did. It only took a lawsuit to do it as Texas did not like the “Fathers Age ?” 9 bit.
Those girls are our treasures. (Headaches and problems but treasures)
Interesting question posed by Braveheart at the Natural Born Citizen Blog:
Braveheart Says:
September 21, 2009 at 9:10 pm
Leo, can you use the legal theory of waiver at all? As in, Obama has made available a digital image of his alleged COLB, as a result, he was waived his right to privacy on the certificate of live birth. Exactly what privacy interest of Obama’s is being protected by not releasing Obama’s certificate of live birth (the long form) if Obama has already made his certification of live birth (the short form) public?
Good luck to you and MissTickly!
[Ed. You’ve nailed an important argument.]
Most parents who surrender their child for adoption do not want to be found (though they may change their minds later in life). In order to encourage parents to put the child up for adoption, rather than abort, abandon or abuse it, most states have detailed laws protecting the privacy of the birth parents.
Hawaii's statute stipulates a thorough search to contact birth parents, both of whom must agree in order for an adopted child to access the records.
If Obama was adopted, he would only have access to the files if the birth parents consent, or if both can be proven to be dead.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.