Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Court Limits on TSA Searches
Schneier ^ | 08 July 2009 | Bruce Schneier

Posted on 07/09/2009 12:41:39 PM PDT by BGHater

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last
To: BGHater
The TSA should limit its searches to bombs and weapons and leave general policing to the police -- where we know courts and the Constitution still apply.

We do? I hadn't noticed. I was too distracted by the giant sucking sound generated as SCOTUS snatches from me anything vaguely resembling a civil right.

21 posted on 07/09/2009 3:39:40 PM PDT by Still Thinking (If ignorance is bliss, liberals must be ecstatic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldpuppymax
Why, the Hussein Justice Dept has already redefined terrorism. A terrorist is anybody who didn’t vote for Hussein!

Well, he's terrified of us, so I guess it's technically correct. ;-)

22 posted on 07/09/2009 3:42:48 PM PDT by Still Thinking (If ignorance is bliss, liberals must be ecstatic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: parsifal

Can we just stop right here and decide drugs are OK? Please? Not a druggie. Have never done drugs other than alcohol, caffeine, etc. Not even once. But I’d rather live on a street full of hopheads than have even a single civil right weakened by so much as 1%. I’m not willing to live under totalitarian rule just to enable a futile, expensive attempt to insure my neighbors aren’t getting high.


23 posted on 07/09/2009 3:50:33 PM PDT by Still Thinking (If ignorance is bliss, liberals must be ecstatic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Still Thinking

I don’t think you can ever legalize most of them. Maybe pot. The users are just such a drain on society. They would still have to steal to pay the rent. Cops just need to respect the law or watch cases get thrown out. Your average druggie is pretty stupid and if you don’t get him this time, you will the next. Some of this is just that the kind of person you need to be a cop, is often the kind of person who likes to abuse his power.

parsy, who thinks the courts have to start disrespecting the police until the police can earn it back. (and no, I don’t think all cops are bad, it just that cops tend to act like cops)


24 posted on 07/09/2009 3:57:20 PM PDT by parsifal ("Knock and ye shall receive!" (The Bible, somewhere.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: parsifal

Actually that would be the best outcome from my perspective (jealous of civil rights, not fond of drugs), but the goobermints, federal state and lokel, seem to be incapable of operating in the mode you describe.


25 posted on 07/09/2009 4:09:38 PM PDT by Still Thinking (If ignorance is bliss, liberals must be ecstatic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Still Thinking

That is why the courts have the exclusionary rule of evidence. Evidence obtained illegally can be suppressed. The court basically said that was the only way they could keep the cops honest. A pretty telling comment on the polizei.

A more “liberal” court may actually start cutting back further on illegal cop activity, such as pretextural stops.

parsy, who used to like Dirty Harry


26 posted on 07/09/2009 5:07:44 PM PDT by parsifal ("Knock and ye shall receive!" (The Bible, somewhere.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: parsifal

I have mixed feelings about liberals on SCOTUS. While they have the reputation as defenders of the BOR, the ones on board now seem as much or more statist and government-sucking than the “conservatives”.


27 posted on 07/09/2009 5:21:55 PM PDT by Still Thinking (If ignorance is bliss, liberals must be ecstatic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Still Thinking

Maybe so. I don’t follow them as much as I need to.

parsy, who wishes he had more time to keep up


28 posted on 07/09/2009 5:27:54 PM PDT by parsifal ("Knock and ye shall receive!" (The Bible, somewhere.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson