Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama's citizenship
1952 Immigration and Nationality Act, Title III, Chapter 3 ^

Posted on 06/14/2009 9:58:45 PM PDT by DavidFarrar

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-190 next last
To: Red Steel

*Sigh* should read:

And if this was correct [what you cited], it’s not, being born overseas on foreign soil, Obama received US citizenship through statute.


21 posted on 06/14/2009 10:39:44 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

Great...now we are getting somewhere. Can you cite me your source?

ex animo
davidfarrar


22 posted on 06/14/2009 10:39:57 PM PDT by DavidFarrar (Constitution, 2nd Amendment,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: DavidFarrar

We discussed this for months here on FR and it was never ever repudiated. My bookmarked Findlaw.com scrubbed it... figures.


23 posted on 06/14/2009 10:44:06 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: DavidFarrar

I’ll search for it.


24 posted on 06/14/2009 10:44:46 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan

LOL .....


25 posted on 06/14/2009 10:44:47 PM PDT by STARWISE (The Art & Science Institute of Chicago Politics NE Div: now open at the White House)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer

All true but irrelevant according to the 1952 Immigration and Nationality Act, Title III, Chapter 3.

ex animo
davidfarrar


26 posted on 06/14/2009 10:55:44 PM PDT by DavidFarrar (Constitution, 2nd Amendment,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

Well, it does make sense to me. I mean, to keep young U.S. girls from being sexually exploited. But to date, I have seen/heard nothing by talk, which is interesting, but not very useful.

In terms of your first point about getting this issue into court. If the facts are correct, the truth will come out. All we need is proper standing and that can always be arranged, if we have a strong case. Build your case first, the court will follow.

ex animo
davidfarrar


27 posted on 06/14/2009 10:55:44 PM PDT by DavidFarrar (Constitution, 2nd Amendment,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: DavidFarrar
Here's what it says:

"a. Section 301 as Effective on December 24, 1952: When enacted in 1952, section 301 required a U.S. citizen married to an alien to have been physically present in the United States for ten years, including five after reaching the age of fourteen, to transmit citizenship to foreign-born children. The ten-year transmission requirement remained in effect from 12:01 a.m. EDT December 24, 1952, through midnight November 13, 1986, and still is applicable to persons born during that period. "

Source:

http://digg.com/politics/Barack_Obama_is_Ineligible_to_Run_for_President?t=17685772

And they got it from here:

http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/86757.pdf

28 posted on 06/14/2009 11:01:01 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: DavidFarrar

That is why I said “doubt”. However, if you’re referring to the laws surrounding the conferring of citizenship by parents, then there have been several legal opinions given right here (in the LONG thread from last year) which state that Obama’s mother was too young to automatically confer citizenship IF he was born overseas (which now seems likely). Then, of course, there’s the other thread that his father was a citizen of the British Empire and automatically conferred British/Kenyan citizenship which Obama would have had to renounce at the age of 18, which there is no record of him doing. Then, of course, there’s the question of being adopted by an Indonesian and taking up Indonesian citizenship which, again, he would have had to renounce at the age of 18 and which, if he travelled on an Indonesian passport after that, he quite obviously did not do.

All in all, a dog’s breakfast and, on the balance of probabilities, he is NOT entitled to be where he is for multiple reasons.


29 posted on 06/14/2009 11:06:19 PM PDT by Nipfan (The desire to save humanity is always a false front for the urge to rule it - H L Mencken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: DavidFarrar
Well, it does make sense to me. I mean, to keep young U.S. girls from being sexually exploited. But to date, I have seen/heard nothing by talk, which is interesting, but not very useful.

Yes, most likely the though processes that went into the law at the time.

30 posted on 06/14/2009 11:07:39 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: kik5150
Arnold Schwarzenegger is a citizen. He cannot be president.

Kinda sums it up.
31 posted on 06/14/2009 11:10:50 PM PDT by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: DavidFarrar

The cite is from FAM 1130 on Page 17 of 103


32 posted on 06/14/2009 11:12:46 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: DecentAmerican

who you callin’ ‘newbie?’


33 posted on 06/14/2009 11:19:12 PM PDT by EDINVA (A government that robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the support of Paul -- G. B. Shaw)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: douginthearmy
As far as I can tell, he hasnt needed much for lawyers because no court will take the case.

Distrust of the court system. judges bought and paid for, activist judges (perhaps following dictates handed down to them), or something else seemingly not kosher are issues within the many requests for documentation and refusal of the court system to acknowledge or satisfy petitioner and/or citizen requests (fast becoming demands by ever-increasing numbers of people) for correct legal documentation to prove natural born citizenship.

If we cannot trust our court system to administer Constitutional law (or for judges to outright and consistently refuse to hear and justly rule on relevant cases presented to it), that issue must be addressed pronto.

34 posted on 06/14/2009 11:33:44 PM PDT by MamaDearest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

If there is another attack on America, Leon Paneta said that Dick Cheney would seem to be pleased because of the way B. HUSSEIN Obama is running/ruining the country.
It is my personal opinion that Paneta and HUSSEIN belong to the correct political party (the symbol is appropriate).,
It is strange to have an anti-American as president. This man is a Muslim, the first of the Muslim religion. Why is he destroying America?
God bless us and save us from HUSSEIN’s hatred. Where oh where did birth certificates go?
How do the voters like HUSSEIN now?


35 posted on 06/14/2009 11:41:09 PM PDT by joydocsusie (ILLEGAL ALIENS HAVE NO RIGHT TO OUR SOCIAL SECURITY MONEY OR ANYTHING ELSE IN THE USA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: DavidFarrar

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eAaQNACwaLw


36 posted on 06/15/2009 12:22:31 AM PDT by danamco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: DavidFarrar
In your investigation did parse the section about the difference between Naturalized Citizens and Natural Citizens?

Needs repeating!!!!

37 posted on 06/15/2009 1:36:04 AM PDT by rawcatslyentist (<P>Oh Yeah<P><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ajsov1M4h50"> Thank You Satan 1:50</a>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: douginthearmy
>"I simply cannot believe that Hillary would have given up the presidency"

Her polls were not good enough to get her that position in an election.

She will yet be president.

They are waiting till Stinky wrings as much out of us as he can. Just before revolution sets in, she will "save" us.

38 posted on 06/15/2009 1:39:35 AM PDT by rawcatslyentist (<P>Oh Yeah<P><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ajsov1M4h50"> Thank You Satan 1:50</a>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: DavidFarrar
All King Zer0 has to do is one thing that he so far has inexplicably refused to do - at great expense:


39 posted on 06/15/2009 1:47:01 AM PDT by Bon mots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DavidFarrar

What is the name of the doctor who deliver Obama?


40 posted on 06/15/2009 1:52:40 AM PDT by FTJM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-190 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson