Skip to comments.
Bill O'Reilly Vs. Joan Walsh: the Shootout
The Provocateur ^
| 06/13/2009
| Mike Volpe
Posted on 06/13/2009 5:36:19 PM PDT by fiscon1
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-55 next last
To: untwist
a pro choice catholic?
is that sort of like Jews for Jesus.
21
posted on
06/13/2009 6:25:24 PM PDT
by
fiscon1
To: RightField
Good point.
If a fetus is not a baby, then, it shouldn’t matter if there have been 2 or 20 million abortions.
22
posted on
06/13/2009 6:29:29 PM PDT
by
stylin_geek
(Greed and envy is used by our political class to exploit the rich and poor.)
To: untwist
“She recoiled and tried to turn the subject away from the real point.”
She threw out the old gun control argument and the jeneane garafolo. ?????? She was pulling out all the stops!
Its what liberals always do.
23
posted on
06/13/2009 6:31:21 PM PDT
by
jackv
(The darkness hates the light!)
To: Rashputin
I agree completely.
The hormone and mood issues are some of the very reasons why I think any new anti-abortion laws should show compassion towards the mother.
I want to punish the butcher doctors!
24
posted on
06/13/2009 6:34:13 PM PDT
by
Kansas58
To: fiscon1
She unmasked herself and the true agenda of the “pro-choice” crowd. Really sick stuff.
25
posted on
06/13/2009 6:34:55 PM PDT
by
untwist
To: jackv
Again a Dracula parallel. He only comes out at night. When BOR shined the spotlight of this sickness on her she naturally unraveled and started spewing this twisted, unrelated nonsense. You are right that liberals never hold up well under serious, truthful scrutiny. O’Reilly is often “the show” himself but I give credit where due. He was very strong on this and on the seriousness of the Notre Dame situation, with all that inappropriate hailing to Obama. This was a very instructive interview.
26
posted on
06/13/2009 6:40:51 PM PDT
by
untwist
To: fiscon1
I watched most of that interview. Then it was time to go barf. She is completely void of a conscience. I bet she has no problem with Obama’s belief that if a child survives an attempted murder and breathes it’s first breath, it’s OK with them to kill the child after it is born too.
27
posted on
06/13/2009 6:47:17 PM PDT
by
TheConservativeParty
("Government is not reason, it is not eloquence, it is force." George Washington)
To: South40
THAT WOULD HAVE BEEN A GREAT ARGUMENT!!!!
DING! DING! DING! DING! O’REILLY
28
posted on
06/13/2009 6:50:14 PM PDT
by
Mr. K
(physically unabel to proofreed (<---oops))
To: fiscon1
O’Reilly is right on this issue but he handled the debate poorly. Shouting down your opponent and screaming the same things over again are not persuasive. He can’t think very fast on his feet and his primary stock in trade is anger and yelling. We need some people who can speak to this issue in a way that shows others how we’re in the right.
29
posted on
06/13/2009 6:54:00 PM PDT
by
bigbob
To: fiscon1
Besides the screaming at the TV I did with her as a typical dead-soul Pro-Abort, I noticed two things she tried;
1. When BOR played the John Hopkins Psych, she used the line 'What does that man know about what these women I've talked to have to go through" - as if stabbing a baby in the back of the head to suck its brains out so I can continue my life is somehow something only a woman can have a valid opinion about,
2. When BOR slammed her she said 'You'll be sorry...' - which I took as a threat of some kind. BOR didn't pick up on it on the air.
Bottom line, I don't always like his middle-of-the-road on different issues but on the rights of children on either side of the womb, he's a fierce warrior and I'm glad for that.
To: Mr. K
He brought up that one but it got no response and quickly lost in the warfare.
To: stylin_geek
Good point.
If a fetus is not a baby, then, it shouldnt matter if there have been 2 or 20 million abortions.
Rush is starting to make this point more and more lately - one I am going to put in my quiver. If they mean what they say that it's not wrong - then why do they equivocate on frequency and circumstances - totally evil but their pricked consciences contradict.
To: fiscon1
More like Nazis for Judaism.Jews consider Jesus a prophet but not the Messiah. She is as much a Catholic as Obama is a Christian.
33
posted on
06/13/2009 7:06:22 PM PDT
by
Apercu
("A man's character is his fate" - Heraclitus)
To: fiscon1
a pro choice catholic? is that sort of like Jews for Jesus.
It is more like meat eating vegetarian.
The lady was vile.
To: Cowboy Bob
Yep, she has a ten age daughter.
35
posted on
06/13/2009 7:19:32 PM PDT
by
mono
To: Cowboy Bob
I wonder is Ms. Walsh is a Mother? IMHO she's a "Mother" alright...
Regards,
GtG
PS That's only the half of it!
36
posted on
06/13/2009 7:23:27 PM PDT
by
Gandalf_The_Gray
(I live in my own little world, I like it 'cuz they know me here.)
To: time4good
2. When BOR slammed her she said 'You'll be sorry...' - which I took as a threat of some kind. BOR didn't pick up on it on the air. I heard that as well, and remarked out loud that the woman just threatened BOR. I hope he comments on that specific remark soon. She definitely threatened him IMO.
37
posted on
06/13/2009 7:26:31 PM PDT
by
RightField
(A fine is a tax for doing wrong. A tax is a fine for doing well.)
To: RightField
I emailed oreilly@foxnews.com to point that out. THAT should not go unanswered ON THE AIR. He needs to address that at the top of the next show. Email him so it’s more than just li’l ol’ me ;)
To: fiscon1
...ultimately she believes that no fetus has any rights at any time. By her own statements and acknowledgment that she is a Roman Catholic, she should be excommunicated. This is where I have difficulty understanding why the Catholic Church tolerates those (many others - some politicians, some famous or celebrities) who blaspheme the basic doctrine of the church, yet continue to receive the sacraments and call themselves Catholics. The Church KNOWS who many of these outspoken people are, yet tolerates this disgusting and repulsive behavior that degrades the Church and all it stands for.
To: South40
Where the heck were they in Nov?
40
posted on
06/13/2009 8:02:06 PM PDT
by
taildragger
(Palin / Mulally 2012)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-55 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson